https://goodwoodpub.com/index.php/AiPLaP <p data-start="0" data-end="443"><strong data-start="0" data-end="37">Advances in Public Law and Policy</strong> is a peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to advancing rigorous scholarship at the intersection of public law, governance, and public policy. The journal provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, doctrinal, and empirical research that examines the development, interpretation, and implementation of public law and its implications for public policy at national, regional, and global levels.</p> <p data-start="445" data-end="917">The journal welcomes high-quality original articles, review essays, and policy analyses that address constitutional law, administrative law, regulatory governance, human rights, public institutions, comparative public law, and the legal dimensions of public policy design and implementation. Particular emphasis is placed on research that bridges legal analysis with policy relevance, offering insights that inform lawmakers, regulators, courts, and public administrators.</p> <p data-start="919" data-end="1409" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node=""><strong data-start="919" data-end="956">Advances in Public Law and Policy</strong> seeks to foster dialogue between scholars and practitioners by publishing work that contributes to theoretical advancement while also addressing contemporary public challenges, including democratic governance, rule of law, regulatory reform, social justice, and sustainable development. The journal aspires to become a leading platform for innovative and impactful scholarship in public law and public policy, with a global and comparative perspective.</p> Goodwood Publishing en-US Advances in Public Law and Policy https://goodwoodpub.com/index.php/AiPLaP/article/view/3869 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: This study examines the formulation and implementation of Jakarta’s public transport integration policy, specifically focusing on the JakLingKo program introduced in 2018. It investigates how the program integrates multiple transport modes through unified route management, institutional coordination, and a digital account-based fare system.</p> <p><strong>Methodology/approach</strong>: This study uses a qualitative research design based on a systematic literature review and genealogical discourse analysis. An interpretive–constructivist framework is applied to conceptualize policy as the product of historically embedded institutional interactions and power relations.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong>: The study finds that JakLingko operates within a network governance arrangement, involving interdependence and collaboration among public and private actors. However, the effectiveness of the program is constrained by fragmented institutional authority, uneven funding structures, and persistent coordination challenges.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: The research concludes that successful transport integration requires not only coordination mechanisms but also clear institutional mandates and political authority to address the governance challenges in Jakarta’s public transport system.</p> <p><strong>Limitations</strong>:. The study’s findings may be limited by the scope of the literature reviewed and the specific context of Jakarta, which might not be fully generalizable to other cities with different governance structures or transport systems.</p> <p><strong>Contributions</strong>: The study contributes to urban governance literature by demonstrating that collaborative transport integration, such as JakLingko, requires a holistic approach that combines effective coordination, clear mandates, and strong political authority to overcome governance challenges.</p> Muhammad Ziyad Zainudin Raihan Raditya Waki Muhammad Rizki Az Radzi Atha Setiawan Fatkhuri Fatkhuri Ridwan Ridwan Copyright (c) 2026 Advances in Public Law and Policy 2026-01-29 2026-01-29 1 1 1 12 10.35912/aiplap.v1i1.3869