Juridical analysis of the position of laboratory results in proving narcotics crimes in the military environment (Juridical Review in Decision Number 12-K/PMT-II/AU/V/2021)
Abstract:
Purpose: This study aims to analyze the Juridical Position of Laboratory Results in Proving Narcotics Crimes in the Military Environment (Juridical Review in Decision Number 12-K/PMT-II/AU/V/2021).
Research/methodology: This research is a type of normative juridical research, the data analysis in this thesis research is descriptive analytical.
Results: It is associated with the position of laboratory results as evidence that should be very absolute and very strong because it cannot be disputed because the laboratory results are the results of measurement and weighing, because something measured that is weighed contains certainty rather than just a statement, because it is impossible for people to know the content of blood, the urine contains narcotics if you only look at urine and blood. So in this case, the laboratory results are very strong compared to witness statements and witnesses in general. According to the Minutes of the Criminal Laboratory Examination No. LAB 5743/NNF/2020 dated December 3, 2020, Evidence No. 3312/2020/NF to 3316/2020/NF,- in the form of cups, plastic clips, plastic bottles with straws, plastic bottle caps with straws and aluminum foil containing methamphetamine. The author argues that a negative urine test result as the only evidence is not enough to acquit the defendant of all charges, the judge must consider all the evidence presented and the decision must be based on a minimum of two valid evidence. If there is no other evidence sufficient to support the charges, the defendant can be acquitted, but if there is other strong evidence, the defendant can still be found guilty even if the urine test is negative.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Alim, M. Z., Triono, A., & Yudhi, R. (2023). The right to environmental cleanliness through waste management in West Lampung Regency. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 2(2), 53-63. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v2i2.1819
Bismar, W. O., Respationo, S., Erniyanti, E., Fadlan, F., Ramlan, R., & Parameshwara, P. (2022). Analysis of licensing law on business services based on the Online Single Submission (OSS) system. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 2(1), 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v2i1.1767
Bustomi, Y. (2023). Politik Hukum Putusan MK No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 sebagai Upaya Pembangunan Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 3(1), 9-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v3i1.1795
Damaiyanti, G., Nofrial, R., & Erniyanti, E. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Diversi dan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak pada Tingkat Penyidikan Demi Mewujudkan Perlindungan Anak. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2(2), 93-98. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v2i2.1674
Hiariej, E. O. (2013). Teori dan hukum pembuktian.
Pradwipta Brianaji, I., Robertus Bima, W., & Ardyanto Imam, W. (2015). Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anggota TNI. Serambi Hukum, 8(02), 23089.
Rachmad, A. (2019). Peranan Laboratorium Forensik Dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Pada Tingkat Penyidikan. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 14(1), 15-24.
Sagita, A. (2017). Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Sebagai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 17(1), 21-43.
Saputro, D. D., Ismail, I., & Iryani, D. (2023). EKSISTENSI LABORATORIUM KRIMINAL PUSPOMAD UNTUK MENDUKUNG KETERSEDIAAN ALAT BUKTI TINDAK PIDANA DI PERADILAN MILITER. SETARA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 20-42.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. (No Title).
Suartama, S. M., & Dewi, C. I. D. L. (2023). Efektivitas atas Tata Kepemerintahan yang Baik dalam Penyelenggaraan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah Kabupaten Karangasem. Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan, 1(2), 105-112. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v1i2.1952
Wulansari, E. M. (2023). Permodelan dan Bentuk Hukum Pokok-Pokok Haluan Negara sebagai Payung Hukum Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Berkesinambungan dalam Rangka Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 5.0 dan Indonesia Emas. Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan, 2(1), 17-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v2i1.2346
Zahrani, S. S., Nurmayani, N., & Deviani, E. (2022). Preventing early marriage in North Lampung Regency: An analysis of the efforts of the Ministry of Religion's Office. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 2(1), 23-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v2i1.1893
Zulfa, M. D., Raharjo, E., & Shafira, M. (2022). Policy formulation crime contempt of court based on the national criminal code. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 2(1), 37-48. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v2i1.1969
- Alim, M. Z., Triono, A., & Yudhi, R. (2023). The right to environmental cleanliness through waste management in West Lampung Regency. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 2(2), 53-63. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v2i2.1819
- Bismar, W. O., Respationo, S., Erniyanti, E., Fadlan, F., Ramlan, R., & Parameshwara, P. (2022). Analysis of licensing law on business services based on the Online Single Submission (OSS) system. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 2(1), 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v2i1.1767
- Bustomi, Y. (2023). Politik Hukum Putusan MK No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 sebagai Upaya Pembangunan Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 3(1), 9-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v3i1.1795
- Damaiyanti, G., Nofrial, R., & Erniyanti, E. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Diversi dan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak pada Tingkat Penyidikan Demi Mewujudkan Perlindungan Anak. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2(2), 93-98. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v2i2.1674
- Hiariej, E. O. (2013). Teori dan hukum pembuktian.
- Pradwipta Brianaji, I., Robertus Bima, W., & Ardyanto Imam, W. (2015). Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anggota TNI. Serambi Hukum, 8(02), 23089.
- Rachmad, A. (2019). Peranan Laboratorium Forensik Dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Pada Tingkat Penyidikan. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 14(1), 15-24.
- Sagita, A. (2017). Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Sebagai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 17(1), 21-43.
- Saputro, D. D., Ismail, I., & Iryani, D. (2023). EKSISTENSI LABORATORIUM KRIMINAL PUSPOMAD UNTUK MENDUKUNG KETERSEDIAAN ALAT BUKTI TINDAK PIDANA DI PERADILAN MILITER. SETARA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 20-42.
- Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. (No Title).
- Suartama, S. M., & Dewi, C. I. D. L. (2023). Efektivitas atas Tata Kepemerintahan yang Baik dalam Penyelenggaraan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah Kabupaten Karangasem. Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan, 1(2), 105-112. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v1i2.1952
- Wulansari, E. M. (2023). Permodelan dan Bentuk Hukum Pokok-Pokok Haluan Negara sebagai Payung Hukum Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Berkesinambungan dalam Rangka Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 5.0 dan Indonesia Emas. Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan, 2(1), 17-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v2i1.2346
- Zahrani, S. S., Nurmayani, N., & Deviani, E. (2022). Preventing early marriage in North Lampung Regency: An analysis of the efforts of the Ministry of Religion's Office. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 2(1), 23-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v2i1.1893
- Zulfa, M. D., Raharjo, E., & Shafira, M. (2022). Policy formulation crime contempt of court based on the national criminal code. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 2(1), 37-48. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v2i1.1969
