The philosophical essence and role of the concept of compromise: A methodological analysis
Abstract:
Purpose: This study aims to analyze the philosophical essence and methodological foundations of the concept of compromise, with a focus on its role in fostering harmony and stability in political, social, and spiritual contexts, particularly within the Naqshbandi teachings in Uzbekistan.
Research methodology: The research employs dialectical, synergetic, hermeneutic, and metaphysical approaches to examine the definitions, interpretations, and practical applications of compromise. It draws from primary sources in Sufism, literature reviews, and philosophical texts to explore the multifaceted meanings of compromise across individual, social, and institutional levels.
Results: The study finds that the philosophy of compromise, especially as taught in the Naqshbandi tradition, serves as a vital mechanism for sustaining peace, social cohesion, and ideological resilience. It highlights how the culture of dialogue, self-awareness, and moderation strengthens interpersonal and community relations, promoting long-term stability and development in diverse social environments.
Conlusion: Compromise in the Naqshbandi tradition is a holistic philosophy promoting peace, tolerance, and social balance. It reflects a spiritual and ethical approach to resolving conflicts and fostering community harmony.
Limitation: The study is context-specific to Naqshbandi teachings in Uzbekistan and lacks empirical validation, limiting its generalizability across broader contexts.
Contribution: This research integrates spiritual philosophy into political discourse, offering a multidimensional framework for understanding compromise as both ethical and practical in sustaining social cohesion.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Balogun, S., & Aruoture, E. (2025). Healing the Nation from the Inside Out: The Role of Home and Family in National Development. Caritas Journal of Psychology and Behaviourial Sciences, 3(1).
Baxter, L. A., & Scharp, K. M. (2015). Dialectical tensions in relationships. The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, 1-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic017
Dauda, M. H. (2025). Peace Building: A Means of Sustaining National Development. Journal of African Innovation and Advanced Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.70382/ajaias.v7i2.017
Dereniowska, M. (2019). Towards a Global Ethics of Compromise. Paper presented at the International Colloquium on Global Ethics of Compromise.
Fumurescu, A. (2013). Compromise: A political and philosophical history: Cambridge University Press.
Giri, A. K. (2011). Cultivating transformative reconciliation and striving for peace: Compassion, confrontation and a new art of integration. Current sociology, 59(5), 604-609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111408669
Kleingeld, P., & Anderson, J. (2014). Justice as a family value: How a commitment to fairness is compatible with love. Hypatia, 29(2), 320-336. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12048
Lamers, W. S., Boyack, K., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., & Murray, D. (2021). Meta-Research: Investigating disagreement in the scientific literature. Elife, 10, e72737. doi:https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72737
Löhr, K., Aruqaj, B., Baumert, D., Bonatti, M., Brüntrup, M., Bunn, C., . . . Hachmann, S. (2021). Social cohesion as the missing link between natural resource management and peacebuilding: lessons from cocoa production in Côte d’Ivoire and Colombia. Sustainability, 13(23), 13002. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313002
Mitchell, D. (2023). Rescuing reconciliation: finding its role in peace research and practice. Third World Quarterly, 44(8), 1737-1753. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2205120
Nugroho, W. (2021). Sufism and Interreligious Dialogue: The Naqshbandi Haqqani Sufi Order in Indonesia. Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism, 10(1), 111-126.
Patrissia, R. U. (2024). Dialectic Perspective on Interpersonal Conflict of Pre-Divorce and Its Reconciliation. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 17(1), 155-168. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v17i1.3505
PU?NEI, I. (2023). Source language and culture interference in translation. ACROSS Journal of Interdisciplinary Cross-border Studies, 7(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.35219/across.2023.4.01
Raimi, L. (2024). Do Islamic epistemology and ethics advance the understanding and promotion of sustainable development? A systematic review using PRISMA. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-04-2024-0115
Rehman Mayar, H. U. (2018). Sustaining peace and shared prosperity: The question of fragile states. Global Social Policy, 18(2), 222-227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018118789808
Sîrbu, A., Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D., & Tria, F. (2013). Cohesion, consensus and extreme information in opinion dynamics. Advances in Complex Systems, 16(06), 1350035. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525913500355
Spang, F. (2023). Compromise in political theory. Political Studies Review, 21(3), 594-607. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299221131268
Tholen, B. (2022). Holding It All Together: on the Value of Compromise and the Virtues of Compromising. Human Studies, 45(3), 493-508. doi:10.1007/s10746-022-09638-2
Velthuis, E., Verkuyten, M., & Smeekes, A. (2021). The Different Faces of Social Tolerance: Conceptualizing and Measuring Respect and Coexistence Tolerance. Social Indicators Research, 158(3), 1105-1125. doi:10.1007/s11205-021-02724-5
Xasanbayeva, S., & Mannonova, S. (2025). Linguistic analysis of legal terminology in English and Uzbek. Journal of science-innovative research in Uzbekistan, 3(4), 506-511.
- Balogun, S., & Aruoture, E. (2025). Healing the Nation from the Inside Out: The Role of Home and Family in National Development. Caritas Journal of Psychology and Behaviourial Sciences, 3(1).
- Baxter, L. A., & Scharp, K. M. (2015). Dialectical tensions in relationships. The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, 1-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic017
- Dauda, M. H. (2025). Peace Building: A Means of Sustaining National Development. Journal of African Innovation and Advanced Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.70382/ajaias.v7i2.017
- Dereniowska, M. (2019). Towards a Global Ethics of Compromise. Paper presented at the International Colloquium on Global Ethics of Compromise.
- Fumurescu, A. (2013). Compromise: A political and philosophical history: Cambridge University Press.
- Giri, A. K. (2011). Cultivating transformative reconciliation and striving for peace: Compassion, confrontation and a new art of integration. Current sociology, 59(5), 604-609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111408669
- Kleingeld, P., & Anderson, J. (2014). Justice as a family value: How a commitment to fairness is compatible with love. Hypatia, 29(2), 320-336. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12048
- Lamers, W. S., Boyack, K., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., & Murray, D. (2021). Meta-Research: Investigating disagreement in the scientific literature. Elife, 10, e72737. doi:https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72737
- Löhr, K., Aruqaj, B., Baumert, D., Bonatti, M., Brüntrup, M., Bunn, C., . . . Hachmann, S. (2021). Social cohesion as the missing link between natural resource management and peacebuilding: lessons from cocoa production in Côte d’Ivoire and Colombia. Sustainability, 13(23), 13002. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313002
- Mitchell, D. (2023). Rescuing reconciliation: finding its role in peace research and practice. Third World Quarterly, 44(8), 1737-1753. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2205120
- Nugroho, W. (2021). Sufism and Interreligious Dialogue: The Naqshbandi Haqqani Sufi Order in Indonesia. Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism, 10(1), 111-126.
- Patrissia, R. U. (2024). Dialectic Perspective on Interpersonal Conflict of Pre-Divorce and Its Reconciliation. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 17(1), 155-168. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v17i1.3505
- PU?NEI, I. (2023). Source language and culture interference in translation. ACROSS Journal of Interdisciplinary Cross-border Studies, 7(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.35219/across.2023.4.01
- Raimi, L. (2024). Do Islamic epistemology and ethics advance the understanding and promotion of sustainable development? A systematic review using PRISMA. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-04-2024-0115
- Rehman Mayar, H. U. (2018). Sustaining peace and shared prosperity: The question of fragile states. Global Social Policy, 18(2), 222-227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018118789808
- Sîrbu, A., Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D., & Tria, F. (2013). Cohesion, consensus and extreme information in opinion dynamics. Advances in Complex Systems, 16(06), 1350035. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525913500355
- Spang, F. (2023). Compromise in political theory. Political Studies Review, 21(3), 594-607. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299221131268
- Tholen, B. (2022). Holding It All Together: on the Value of Compromise and the Virtues of Compromising. Human Studies, 45(3), 493-508. doi:10.1007/s10746-022-09638-2
- Velthuis, E., Verkuyten, M., & Smeekes, A. (2021). The Different Faces of Social Tolerance: Conceptualizing and Measuring Respect and Coexistence Tolerance. Social Indicators Research, 158(3), 1105-1125. doi:10.1007/s11205-021-02724-5
- Xasanbayeva, S., & Mannonova, S. (2025). Linguistic analysis of legal terminology in English and Uzbek. Journal of science-innovative research in Uzbekistan, 3(4), 506-511.
