Problem from MK powerful Number 90/PUU- XII/2023 related to article 169 letter Q Number 7 Year 2017 about general election (Election Law)

https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v4i2.3347
Published: Aug 21, 2025

Abstract:

Purpose: This study aims to examine the constitutional role and dynamics of the Indonesian Constitutional Court (MK) in moderating election regulations, ensuring democratic inclusivity, and maintaining public trust. The research focuses on how the MK contributes to upholding constitutional justice, political equality, and fair representation in Indonesia’s electoral system.

Research Methodology: The study applies a normative juridical approach supported by doctrinal legal research. Primary data are derived from constitutional provisions, statutory regulations, and Constitutional Court decisions, while secondary data come from academic journals, books, and previous research. A comparative analysis is also used to evaluate Indonesia’s MK alongside similar institutions in other Asian countries.

Results: Findings indicate that the Constitutional Court of Indonesia plays a pivotal role in moderating electoral regulations, such as easing strict nomination thresholds and resolving election disputes. These interventions enhance inclusivity and responsiveness in the electoral process, ultimately strengthening public trust in democracy. The analysis also highlights that the MK’s involvement is more significant compared to similar courts in other Asian democracies.

Conclusions: The Constitutional Court is central to safeguarding democratic values, ensuring fairness in electoral processes, and upholding constitutional justice. Its active role underscores the importance of constitutional oversight in maintaining legitimacy and stability within Indonesia’s democratic system.

Limitations: The study is limited to legal and doctrinal perspectives without empirical fieldwork, which may restrict the analysis of societal perceptions of the MK’s role..

Contribution: This research contributes to constitutional law studies by providing insights into the MK’s function in electoral democracy and offering recommendations for strengthening constitutional justice in emerging democracies.

Keywords:
1. Constitutional Court
2. Constitutional Justice
3. Democracy
4. Electoral Law
5. Political Equality
Authors:
1 . Daud Yaferson Dollu
Nusa Cendana University, Kupang, Indonesia
2 . Rahman N. Fatima
Nusa Cendana University, Kupang, Indonesia
View PDF
How to Cite
Dollu, D. Y. ., & Fatima, R. N. . (2025). Problem from MK powerful Number 90/PUU- XII/2023 related to article 169 letter Q Number 7 Year 2017 about general election (Election Law). Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 4(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v4i2.3347
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): February
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

    Alim, M. Z., Triono, A., & Yudhi, R. (2023). The Right to Environmental Cleanliness through Waste Management in West Lampung Regency, Indonesia Annals of Justice and Humanity, 2(2), 53-63. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v2i2.1819

    Bunda, R. H., Hardianto, H., & Rahayu, P. (2025). Independensi Pengawas, Netralitas Aparatur, dan Efektivitas Hukum dalam Pemilu Serentak di Indonesia. IBLAM Law Review, 5(2), 95-107. doi:https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v5i2.618

    Firman, Sumatono, Muluk, M. K., Setyowati, E., & Rahmawati, R. (2024). Enhancing Citizen Participation: The Key to Public Service Transparency. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2937

    Gardner, J. A. (2020). Democratic Legitimacy under Conditions of Severely Depressed Voter Turnout. The University of Chicago Law Review, 24.

    Henry, O., & Temtime, Z. (2009). Recruitment and Selection Practices in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from a Developing Country Perspective. Advances in Management, 3(2), 52-60.

    Hirschl, R. (2000). Looking Sideways, Looking Backwards, Looking Forwards: Judicial Review vs. Democracy in Comparative Perspective. University of Richmond Law Review, 34, 415-441.

    Ingham, S. (2022). Representative Democracy and Social Equality. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 689-701. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542100109X

    Khan, M. M. R. (2021). Political State and the Dilemma of Dignity, Equality and Freedom: Evidence from a Sovereign State. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 1(1), 29-37. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v1i1.697

    Khan, M. M. R., & Sultana, R. (2021). Shift in the Role of Criminology in Criminal Law: Reflecting the Doctrinal Change. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(1), 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i1.708

    Lovett, A. (2025). The Choice Argument for Proportional Representation. American Journal of Political Science, 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12980

    Mochtar, Z. A. (2025). Guarding Democracy: Judicial Activism in the Indonesian Constitutional Court Decisions in Regional Head Electoral Disputes. Constitutional Review, 11(1), 36-62. doi:https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1112

    Mongrain, P. (2023). Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections. Political Research Quarterly, 76(4), 1589-1603. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129231166679

    Mwesigwa, D. (2021). Policy Implementation in Mid-Western Uganda: Examining Personnel Resources, Financial Capacity, Administrative Capability and Political Support. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 1(1), 63-78. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v1i1.804

    Nameda, A., Kumaki, Y., Hashimoto, Y., & Toda, Y. (2023). Distributive Justice and Development: Toward an Integrative Understanding of Reward and Responsibility Distributions. Journal of Moral Education, 52(4), 435-452. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2022.2134095

    Nurhayati, I., Sa’ari, M. H., Firmanulloh, M. D., & Hermansyah, S. (2022). Konsep Keadilan dalam Perspektif Plato. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(1), 1-25.

    Nurrohman, R., Nugroho, F. R., Tiastiwi, U. N., & Nurgiansah, T. H. (2025). Analisis Permasalahan Penerapan Demokrasi dan Prospek Perbaikannya di Indonesia. Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities, 1(1), 76-80. doi:https://doi.org/10.57235/helium.v1i1.4339

    Osler, A. (2025). Education for Hope and Human Rights in a Turbulent World. Human Rights Education Review, 8(1), 1-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/25355406.2025.2470558

    Sari, R. I., Hidayat, H., & Sari, R. (2023). The Role of the Constitutional Court in Resolving Election Disputes From the Perspective of Justice. International Journal of Social, Policy and Law, 4(2), 113-128. doi:https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v4i2.137

    Sevtiya, F. A. (2025). Eksistensi Konstitusi dalam Pembentukan Hukum Nasional: Perspektif Hukum dan Demokrasi. Jurnal Renvoi: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah, 3(2), 85-95.

    Silva, J. V. S., Chai, C. G., Carneiro, M. F., Fabriz, D. C., & Henriquez, G. d. R. (2024). Constitutional Jurisdiction and Democracy: Linguistic Apprehension of Legal Events. Beijing Law Review, 15(3), 1190-1204. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2024.153072

    Sudarmanto, K., Pranoto, E., & Jain, V. (2025). Electoral Law Reform in the Perspective of Responsive Justice: Comparative Law Between Indonesia, India, and Thailand. SASI, 31(2), 172-187. doi:https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v31i2.2977

    Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

    Warren, M. E. (2025). Democratic Innovation and Representative Democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 23(1), 7-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592724002111

    Zhang, W. (2023). Hybrid Deliberation: Citizen Dialogues in a Post-Pandemic Era. Computers and Society, 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.11412

    Zulfiani, Y. N. (2023). Prevention of Personal Data Privacy Leakage in e-Government, as the Government’s Responsibility. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(1), 29-37. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i1.1383

  1. Alim, M. Z., Triono, A., & Yudhi, R. (2023). The Right to Environmental Cleanliness through Waste Management in West Lampung Regency, Indonesia Annals of Justice and Humanity, 2(2), 53-63. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v2i2.1819
  2. Bunda, R. H., Hardianto, H., & Rahayu, P. (2025). Independensi Pengawas, Netralitas Aparatur, dan Efektivitas Hukum dalam Pemilu Serentak di Indonesia. IBLAM Law Review, 5(2), 95-107. doi:https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v5i2.618
  3. Firman, Sumatono, Muluk, M. K., Setyowati, E., & Rahmawati, R. (2024). Enhancing Citizen Participation: The Key to Public Service Transparency. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2937
  4. Gardner, J. A. (2020). Democratic Legitimacy under Conditions of Severely Depressed Voter Turnout. The University of Chicago Law Review, 24.
  5. Henry, O., & Temtime, Z. (2009). Recruitment and Selection Practices in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from a Developing Country Perspective. Advances in Management, 3(2), 52-60.
  6. Hirschl, R. (2000). Looking Sideways, Looking Backwards, Looking Forwards: Judicial Review vs. Democracy in Comparative Perspective. University of Richmond Law Review, 34, 415-441.
  7. Ingham, S. (2022). Representative Democracy and Social Equality. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 689-701. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542100109X
  8. Khan, M. M. R. (2021). Political State and the Dilemma of Dignity, Equality and Freedom: Evidence from a Sovereign State. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 1(1), 29-37. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v1i1.697
  9. Khan, M. M. R., & Sultana, R. (2021). Shift in the Role of Criminology in Criminal Law: Reflecting the Doctrinal Change. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(1), 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i1.708
  10. Lovett, A. (2025). The Choice Argument for Proportional Representation. American Journal of Political Science, 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12980
  11. Mochtar, Z. A. (2025). Guarding Democracy: Judicial Activism in the Indonesian Constitutional Court Decisions in Regional Head Electoral Disputes. Constitutional Review, 11(1), 36-62. doi:https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1112
  12. Mongrain, P. (2023). Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections. Political Research Quarterly, 76(4), 1589-1603. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129231166679
  13. Mwesigwa, D. (2021). Policy Implementation in Mid-Western Uganda: Examining Personnel Resources, Financial Capacity, Administrative Capability and Political Support. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 1(1), 63-78. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v1i1.804
  14. Nameda, A., Kumaki, Y., Hashimoto, Y., & Toda, Y. (2023). Distributive Justice and Development: Toward an Integrative Understanding of Reward and Responsibility Distributions. Journal of Moral Education, 52(4), 435-452. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2022.2134095
  15. Nurhayati, I., Sa’ari, M. H., Firmanulloh, M. D., & Hermansyah, S. (2022). Konsep Keadilan dalam Perspektif Plato. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(1), 1-25.
  16. Nurrohman, R., Nugroho, F. R., Tiastiwi, U. N., & Nurgiansah, T. H. (2025). Analisis Permasalahan Penerapan Demokrasi dan Prospek Perbaikannya di Indonesia. Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities, 1(1), 76-80. doi:https://doi.org/10.57235/helium.v1i1.4339
  17. Osler, A. (2025). Education for Hope and Human Rights in a Turbulent World. Human Rights Education Review, 8(1), 1-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/25355406.2025.2470558
  18. Sari, R. I., Hidayat, H., & Sari, R. (2023). The Role of the Constitutional Court in Resolving Election Disputes From the Perspective of Justice. International Journal of Social, Policy and Law, 4(2), 113-128. doi:https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v4i2.137
  19. Sevtiya, F. A. (2025). Eksistensi Konstitusi dalam Pembentukan Hukum Nasional: Perspektif Hukum dan Demokrasi. Jurnal Renvoi: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah, 3(2), 85-95.
  20. Silva, J. V. S., Chai, C. G., Carneiro, M. F., Fabriz, D. C., & Henriquez, G. d. R. (2024). Constitutional Jurisdiction and Democracy: Linguistic Apprehension of Legal Events. Beijing Law Review, 15(3), 1190-1204. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2024.153072
  21. Sudarmanto, K., Pranoto, E., & Jain, V. (2025). Electoral Law Reform in the Perspective of Responsive Justice: Comparative Law Between Indonesia, India, and Thailand. SASI, 31(2), 172-187. doi:https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v31i2.2977
  22. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  23. Warren, M. E. (2025). Democratic Innovation and Representative Democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 23(1), 7-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592724002111
  24. Zhang, W. (2023). Hybrid Deliberation: Citizen Dialogues in a Post-Pandemic Era. Computers and Society, 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.11412
  25. Zulfiani, Y. N. (2023). Prevention of Personal Data Privacy Leakage in e-Government, as the Government’s Responsibility. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(1), 29-37. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i1.1383