Political state and the dilemma of dignity, equality and freedom: Evidence from a sovereign state

Published: Aug 5, 2021

Abstract:

Purpose: This study discusses the idea of political redefinition and its connection to dignity, freedom and equality in a sovereign state. This article concludes by briefly touching on some serious issues about sovereign communities that arise as a result of the fundamental dignity, freedom, and equality ideals of the sovereign state.

Research methodology: The author decided to conduct theoretical research in a qualitative format using conceptual analysis as well as critical and rational argumentation. A deductive approach is used in reaching a prior opinion.

Results: The sovereign state itself became the judge and restricted human dignity, equality and the freedom to contract by forcing citizens to make transfers they did not consent to and prohibiting certain private transactions on the sole pretext.

Limitations: There are shortcomings in theoretical research, as the author used a deductive approach to conclude.

Contribution: This study conceptualizes the proponents of a sovereign state to be drawn into the dilemma of dignity, freedom and equality.

Keywords:
1. Political redefinition
2. Political stability in a sovereign state
3. Dignity
4. Freedom
5. Equality
Authors:
Md. Mahfuzur Rahman Khan
How to Cite
Khan, M. M. R. (2021). Political state and the dilemma of dignity, equality and freedom: Evidence from a sovereign state. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 1(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v1i1.697

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
References

    Ashcroft, R. E. (2005). Making sense of dignity. Journal of medical ethics, 31(11), 679-682.

    Caulfield, T., & Chapman, A. (2005). Human dignity as a criterion for science policy. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e244.

    De Vos, A. S., Strydom, H., Fouche, C. B., & Delport, C. S. L. (2005). Research at grass roots. Pretoria. Government Printers.

    Esterhuyse, W. (2004). Recovering the soul of the South African nation. South Africa at, 10.

    Freeman, M. (1994). The philosophical foundations of human rights. Hum. Rts. Q., 16, 491.

    Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication theory, 16(4), 411-426.

    Khan, M. M. R. (2020a). Strategic human resource management in facilitating the organizational performance: Birds-eye view from Bangladesh. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 2(1), 13-24.

    Khan, M. M. R. (2020b). Covid-19’s impact on Fresh Graduate’s Job Market in Bangladesh: An observational study. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2(1), 40-48.

    Khan, M. M. R. (2020c). Rationalizing the Relationship between Ergonomics and Human Resource Management. Journal of Mechanical, Civil and Industrial Engineering, 1(1), 31-35.

    Khan, M. M. R. (2021). Women and Sports: View from Stereotyping and Gender Differentials Perspectives. Journal of Sports and Physical Education Studies, 1(1), 01-04.

    Macklin, R. (2003). Dignity is a useless concept.

    Merrill, J. C. (2004). Global press philosophies. Global journalism: Topical issues and Media Systems, 3-18.

    Nathan, S. M. (2003). International law.

    O’Donovan, J. L. (2010). Human dignity and human justice in theological perspective. The grandeur of reason, 118-135.

    Pipes, R. (1999). Life, Liberty, Property. Commentary, 107(3), 17.

    Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice, rev. edn (1st edn 1971).

    South Africa. President (1999-2008: Mbeki), & Mbeki, T. (2004). State of the Nation address.

    Vogel, B. (Ed.). (2007). At the centre: Human dignity: christian responsibility as a basis für the practice of politics: christian ethics as a guide. Konrad Adenauer Foundation

  1. Ashcroft, R. E. (2005). Making sense of dignity. Journal of medical ethics, 31(11), 679-682.
  2. Caulfield, T., & Chapman, A. (2005). Human dignity as a criterion for science policy. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e244.
  3. De Vos, A. S., Strydom, H., Fouche, C. B., & Delport, C. S. L. (2005). Research at grass roots. Pretoria. Government Printers.
  4. Esterhuyse, W. (2004). Recovering the soul of the South African nation. South Africa at, 10.
  5. Freeman, M. (1994). The philosophical foundations of human rights. Hum. Rts. Q., 16, 491.
  6. Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication theory, 16(4), 411-426.
  7. Khan, M. M. R. (2020a). Strategic human resource management in facilitating the organizational performance: Birds-eye view from Bangladesh. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 2(1), 13-24.
  8. Khan, M. M. R. (2020b). Covid-19’s impact on Fresh Graduate’s Job Market in Bangladesh: An observational study. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2(1), 40-48.
  9. Khan, M. M. R. (2020c). Rationalizing the Relationship between Ergonomics and Human Resource Management. Journal of Mechanical, Civil and Industrial Engineering, 1(1), 31-35.
  10. Khan, M. M. R. (2021). Women and Sports: View from Stereotyping and Gender Differentials Perspectives. Journal of Sports and Physical Education Studies, 1(1), 01-04.
  11. Macklin, R. (2003). Dignity is a useless concept.
  12. Merrill, J. C. (2004). Global press philosophies. Global journalism: Topical issues and Media Systems, 3-18.
  13. Nathan, S. M. (2003). International law.
  14. O’Donovan, J. L. (2010). Human dignity and human justice in theological perspective. The grandeur of reason, 118-135.
  15. Pipes, R. (1999). Life, Liberty, Property. Commentary, 107(3), 17.
  16. Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice, rev. edn (1st edn 1971).
  17. South Africa. President (1999-2008: Mbeki), & Mbeki, T. (2004). State of the Nation address.
  18. Vogel, B. (Ed.). (2007). At the centre: Human dignity: christian responsibility as a basis für the practice of politics: christian ethics as a guide. Konrad Adenauer Foundation