Purpose: In Indonesia, arbitration is regulated by Law No. 30/1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, while China employs the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) for arbitration. Both countries have developed legal frameworks for arbitration, yet notable differences exist in the implementation of online arbitration. Indonesia's adoption of online arbitration accelerated significantly due to the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to the issuance of a decree by the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) in May 2020 to regulate electronic arbitration proceedings. Conversely, China had established its online arbitration system through CIETAC before the pandemic, offering comprehensive online services for dispute resolution. This study aims to analyse the differences and similarities in the use of online arbitration for business dispute resolution between Indonesia and China. Method: The analysis will focus on the regulatory frameworks, technological integration in arbitration processes, and the readiness of each country's infrastructure to support online arbitration, providing insights into the effectiveness and efficiency of these methods in resolving business disputes. Result: There are several differences and similarities in resolving business disputes using online arbitration methods between Indonesia and China. Although both countries do not have regulations that explicitly regulate online arbitration, both provide opportunities for the implementation of online arbitration.

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the impact of environmental management on the growth of the bottled drinking water industry (AMDK) in Indonesia, focusing on the consequences of single-use gallon sales. The bottled water industry in Indonesia has grown significantly due to the high demand for safe and practical drinking water, especially in areas with limited access to clean piped water. However, the use of plastic gallons, whether refillable or disposable, poses serious environmental and health concerns. Method: This research uses a qualitative method with normative juridical, sociological juridical, and analytical juridical approaches. Secondary data were obtained from various literature, while primary data were collected through interviews with communities around Bantargebang landfill, Bekasi. Results: The findings indicate that refillable plastic gallons have a higher risk of releasing microplastics into drinking water due to repeated use, while disposable gallons contribute significantly to plastic waste accumulation, often not being recycled properly. The study also reveals that strict regulations and public education on recycling, as practiced in countries like Japan and Germany, are essential for effective plastic waste management. Implementation: The implementation of BPOM's safety standards, including limits on Bisphenol-A (BPA) migration, is crucial to mitigating health risks. To balance industry growth and environmental sustainability, recommendations include improving environmental management practices, promoting consumer awareness, and enhancing recycling initiatives. The study provides a comprehensive view of the environmental and health impacts of using plastic gallons in the AMDK industry and suggests policy and practical measures to address these challenges.