Article Details
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): August
Implementation of the Child-Friendly Regency Policy in Gianyar, Bali: A Van Meter and Van Horn Analysis
Abstract
Purpose: This study analyzes the implementation of the ChildFriendly Regency policy in Gianyar Regency, Bali, established through Regional Regulation Number 9 of 2022, and identifies the constraints encountered in its implementation.
Research Methodology: A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, drawing on interviews with five purposively selected informants across key institutions, together with observation and policy documents, and analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing using Van Meter and Van Horn's implementation model.
Results: The policy has generally been implemented well but is not yet fully optimized. Standards and objectives are clear, institutional and service support is available, the Child-Friendly Regency Task Force functions as a coordination forum, crosssector communication operates, and implementers show good commitment. However, four constraints persist: suboptimal cross-sector coordination, limited resources and unequal service coverage, evolving child-related problems, and uneven community and child participation.
Conclusions: Implementation succeeds in establishing the instruments of policy but falls short in equalizing outcomes; stronger coordination, more equitable services, enhanced capacity, and broader participation are required.
Limitations: As a single-regency qualitative study with a small purposive sample, the findings are context-specific and not directly generalizable.
Contributions: The study offers context-specific evidence on child-friendly policy implementation in a Balinese regency and demonstrates the analytical value of the Van Meter and Van Horn model in this setting.
Keywords
How to Cite
Download Citation
References
- Alias, A., Mohamad Nasri, N., & Awang, M. M. (2023). A tracer study on child participation in child councillor programmes aimed towards development of the child friendly cities initiative. Children, 10(4), 732. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040732
- Alparone, F. R., & Pacilli, M. G. (2012). On children's independent mobility: The interplay of demographic, environmental, and psychosocial factors. Children's Geographies, 10(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2011.638173
- Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030
- Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2023). Public administration and politics meet turbulence: The search for robust governance responses. Public Administration, 101(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12874
- Arimal, J., Debby, A., & Macella, R. (2023). Implementasi 5 klaster konvensi hak anak dalam mewujudkan kabupaten layak anak di Kabupaten Nagan Raya. Dinamika Governance: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 13(2), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.33005/jdg.v13i2.3854
- Arsjad, M. F., Tabo, S., Nuna, M. S., & Usman, M. J. (2025). Implementasi kebijakan kota layak anak di Kabupaten Gorontalo: Perspektif perlindungan anak dan perempuan. Jurnal Publisitas, 12(1), 18-29.
- Augsberger, A., Collins, M. E., & Howard, R. C. (2024). The global context of youth engagement: A scoping review of youth councils in municipal government. Children and Youth Services Review, 156(1), 107349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107349
- Brown, C., de Lannoy, A., McCracken, D., Gill, T., Grant, M., Wright, H., & Williams, S. (2019). Special issue: Child-friendly cities. Cities & Health, 3(1-2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2019.1682836
- Cairney, P., & Kwiatkowski, R. (2017). How to communicate effectively with policymakers: Combine insights from psychology and policy studies. Palgrave Communications, 3(37), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0046-8
- Cejudo, G. M., & Michel, C. L. (2017). Addressing fragmented government action: Coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 745-767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9 281-5
- Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 21(2), 264-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.147 3477
- Cordero-Vinueza, V. A., Niekerk, F., & van Dijk, T. (2023). Making child-friendly cities: A socio-spatial literature review. Cities, 137, 104248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104248
- Cordero-Vinueza, V. A., van Dijk, T., Lamker, C., & Niekerk, F. (2025). Making child-friendly cities: A quest for local agenda-setting. Cities, 161(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105882
- de Geus, C. J. C., Ingrams, A., Tummers, L., & Pandey, S. K. (2020). Organizational citizenship behavior in the public sector: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13141
- Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 717-747. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016
- Gultom, M. J., & Rostyaningsih, D. (2025). Efektivitas pemenuhan klaster perlindungan khusus melalui kebijakan kota layak anak di Kota Salatiga. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 14(2), 1037-1049. https://doi.org/10.14710/jppmr.v14i2.50757
- Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
- Hupe, P. L., & Hill, M. J. (2016). ‘And the rest is implementation.’ Comparing approaches to what happens in policy processes beyond Great Expectations. Public Policy and Administration, 31(2), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715598828
- Kårtvedt, L. E. (2024). Explaining coordination quality in public service delivery. Public Performance & Management Review, 47(4), 849-872. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2315016
- Liao, Y., & Furuya, K. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of child-friendly cities: A cross-database analysis from 2000 to 2022. Land, 12(10), 1919. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101919
- Lukum, W., Tahir, A., Kamuli, S., Hamim, U., Aneta, Y., Aneta, A., & Isa, R. (2026). Reconstructing Van Meter & Van Horn's model: Public participation in public information disclosure in Gorontalo Province. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 52(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2026/v52i12758
- Malone, K. (2016). Reconsidering children's encounters with nature and place using posthumanism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2015.48
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Pabia, Y. S., Matsunami, J., & Subanu, L. (2022). Collaborative governance in child-friendly city policy implementation in Kendari City, Southeast Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan, 6(2), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v6i2.328
- Parneto, A. B., & Simanjuntak, H. T. R. F. (2022). Implementasi kebijakan Kota Layak Anak (KLA) di Kabupaten Kampar. Cross-Border, 5(1), 766-781.
- Percy-Smith, B. (2022). Placemaking with children and youth: Participatory practices for planning sustainable communities: By Victoria Derr, Louise Chawla, and Mara Mintzer. New York: New Village Press.
- Powell, R. (2024). Child-Friendly cities and communities: Opportunities and challenges. Children’s Geographies, 22(5), 716-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2024.2353746
- Ramos, F., Tavares, A. F., & da Cruz, N. F. (2026). Between promise and practice: A scoping review of the democratic outcomes of youth participation in local governance. Children and Youth Services Review, 181, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108738
- Riggio, E. (2002). Child friendly cities: Good governance in the best interests of the child. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780201400204
- Romzek, B., LeRoux, K., Johnston, J., Kempf, R. J., & Piatak, J. S. (2014). Informal accountability in multisector service delivery collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(4), 813-842. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut027
- Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003846
- Torfing, J., Sorensen, E., & Roiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795-825. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539971668005
- Utari, D. S., Sukristyanto, A., & Rochim, A. I. (2023). Cross-sectoral coordination towards a childfriendly city in Indonesia: A critical study of Tanjungpinang City. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(1), 229-240. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7 105
- Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404
- Wilks, J., & Rudner, J. (2013). A voice for children and young people in the city. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 29(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2013.12
- Windari, R. (2025). Implementasi kebijakan kabupaten layak anak dalam perlindungan khusus di kabupaten mojokerto. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 15(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v8i3.907
