IJAMIS

Article Details

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): February

Determinants and Performance of Regional Development Planning: Evidence from Nduga Regency, Papua, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.35912/ijamis.v4i1.4184
15 May 2026

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the factors influencing the performance of regional development planning in Nduga Regency and analyses the contribution of planning document consistency, integration, and quality.

Research Methodology: A quantitative approach was employed using primary data collected through structured questionnaires administered to 56 respondents from 28 regional government organizations (OPDs) in Nduga Regency, via purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using structural equation Modelling based on Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) with WarpPLS 8.0 software, testing causal relationships among internal factors, external factors, and planning performance.

Results: Internal factors, including document quality, process effectiveness, resource commitment, and implementation readiness, exerted a positive and significant effect on planning performance (P<0.01; R²=0.608; f²=0.608, large effect). External factors were positive but not statistically significant (P=0.08; R²=0.179; f²=0.179, medium effect).

Conclusions: Internal organizational capacity and document alignment are the decisive determinants of regional development planning performance in the Nduga Regency. Despite extreme geographical isolation, endemic security disruption, and heavy fiscal dependency on the central government, the fundamental planning deficit is internal, with limited human resource competence, weak planning–budget linkage, and poor inter-agency coordination.

Limitations: This study is limited by its focus on only 56 respondents from 28 regional government organizations (OPDs) in Nduga Regency, which may not fully represent the diverse perspectives across all regional departments.

Contributions: This study provides valuable insights into the role of internal organizational capacity and document alignment in shaping regional development planning performance in the Nduga Regency.

Keywords

Decentralisation Nduga Regency Regional Development Planning RPJMD RKPD SEM-PLS

How to Cite

Usman, H. ., Marlissa, E. R. ., & S, T. P. U. . (2026). Determinants and Performance of Regional Development Planning: Evidence from Nduga Regency, Papua, Indonesia. International Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, 4(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.35912/ijamis.v4i1.4184

References

  1. Abdullah, S. (2005). Desentralisasi: Konsep, Teori, dan Perdebatannya. dalam Jurnal Desentralisasi, 6(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.37378/jd.2005.4.57-72
  2. Aburaera, M. J. (2023). Kinerja badan perencanaan pembangunan daerah dalam perencanaan pembangunan di kota makassar. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasita', 14(1), 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.47030/administrasita.v14i1.518
  3. Adam, S., Kelana, E., & Akadira, T. (2024). Evaluation Of The Performance Of Bappeda Gayo Lues Regency In The Process Of Preparing The Regional Development Work Plan. RIWAYAT: EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL OF HISTORY AND HUMANITIES ??????????: LPPM Unsyiah, 7(4), 2580-2591. doi:https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v7i4.41597
  4. Ainurrofiq, M., Susanto, H., & Mulyani, S. (2025). Efektivitas Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan di Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Revenue Manuscript, 3(3), 124-133. doi:https://doi.org/10.31334/reformasi.v11i2.4181
  5. Akadun, A. (2024). Analysis of pseudo-decentralization and financial dependency in the implementation of regional autonomy in Sumedang Regency of Indonesia. Viešoji politika ir administravimas, 23(1), 9-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.53.1.33295
  6. Bajo, Y. A., & Zuhdan, M. (2025). Analisis Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Pemerintah Daerah (Sipd) Dalam Menunjang Kinerja Badan Perencanaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah (Bappeda) Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Journal Publicuho, 8(2), 959-970. doi:https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v8i2.774
  7. Ekaputra, A. A., Febrianti, A., Muntaha, A. Y., Trianita, D., & Susanti, P. (2025). Dampak Desentralisasi Terhadap Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat Dan Pemerintah Daerah. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 13(1), 11-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.58344/jig.v3i4.298
  8. Engkus, E. (2013). Desentralisasi (Teori yang Baik dengan Praktek yang buruk). DESENTRALISASI (Teori yang Baik Dengan Praktek yang buruk)(4), 1-16.
  9. Febriani, F. I., Swaramarinda, D. R., & Maulida, E. (2025). The Influence of Entrepreneurship Literacy and Digital Literacy on Entrepreneurial Interest among Generation Z Students. Klabat Journal of Management, 6(2), 96-110. doi:https://doi.org/10.60090/kjm.v6i2.1330.96-110
  10. Ghozali, I. (2021). Partial least squares: konsep, teknik, dan aplikasi menggunakan program SmartPLS 3.2. 9 untuk penelitian empiris.
  11. Habibani, R. A., Frinaldi, A., Hendranaldi, H., & Magriasti, L. (2025). Desentralisasi sebagai ilusi politik: Kritik terhadap implementasi teori otonomi di era parlementer (1950–1959). SOCIAL : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPS, 5(4), 1503-1512. doi:https://doi.org/10.51878/social.v5i4.7998
  12. Holtzappel, C. J., & Ramstedt, M. (2009). Decentralization and regional autonomy in Indonesia: implementation and challenges: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  13. Indrijantoro, W., Irwansyah, I., & Fahriyah, A. (2024). The function of the regional development work plan in the planning and budgeting process of Bekasi City. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(8), 2873-2882. doi:https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v3i8.10562
  14. Khalik, H., Alam, S., & Jamil, M. (2025). Analisis kinerja dan konsistensi perencanaan pembangunan kota makassar (studi kasus program smart city). Bisnis-Net Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 8(1), 115-129. doi:https://doi.org/10.46576/bn.v8i1.5822
  15. Nisa, S. M., Bahri, S., & Nurkaidah, N. (2025). Monitoring Dan Evaluasi Kinerja Pada Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Makassar Pada Program Penanganan Stunting. Jurnal Sosiologi Kontemporer, 5(1), 47-51. doi:https://doi.org/10.56326/jsk.v5i1.6421
  16. Panggabean, F. Y., Dalimunthe, M. B., Ramli, R., Magdalena, L., & Lingga, R. D. (2023). Analisis Kinerja Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Dalam Pembanguan Kota Medan. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial, 7(1), 66-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.38043/jids.v7i1.4184
  17. Patra, A. D. A., & Rusli, A. (2023). Planning Consistency Analysis and Palopo City Government Budgeting Year 2016-2020. Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business, 5(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v5i2.3813
  18. Pratama, T., Frinaldi, A., Naldi, H., & Magriasti, L. (2025). Relevansi desentralisasi terhadap dinamika pemerintahan lokal: kajian literatur pada pemberdayaan masyarakat dan nagari kabupaten agam. Social : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPS, 5(4), 1737-1748. doi:https://doi.org/10.51878/social.v5i4.8544
  19. Putri, A. G. (2024). Evaluasi indeks kualitas perencanaan pembangunan daerah: Studi kasus kabupaten berau, kalimantan timur. ACCOUNTIA JOURNAL (Accounting Trusted, Inspiring, Authentic Journal), 8(01), 13-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.35915/accountia.v8i01.875
  20. Putri, A. M., & Bataha, K. (2024). Analisis Kinerja Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Bappeda) Kabupaten Sidoarjo Dalam Penyusunan Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah. Jurnal Progress Administrasi Publik, 4(1), 126-133. doi:https://doi.org/10.37090/jpap.v4i1.1266
  21. Syarief, M., & Maulana, M. (2019). Desentralisasi Fiskal Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kinerja Otonomi Daerah Pasca Pemekaran (Studi di Kabupaten Tulang Bawang, Tuba Barat, dan Mesuji Lampung). COSMOGOV, 5(2), 147-162. doi:https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v5i2.22803
  22. Talitha, T., Firman, T., & Hudalah, D. (2020). Welcoming two decades of decentralization in Indonesia: a regional development perspective. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(5), 690-708. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1601595
  23. Wajdy, M. F., Warsono, H., Yuwono, T., & Herawati, A. R. (2025). Reflecting on 20 years of regional development planning in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10, 76-89. doi:https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i12s.1716
WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email