JGAS

Article Details

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): July

Relationship between Local Government Commitment and Digital Public Service Implementation Under Prabowo Subianto

https://doi.org/10.35912/jgas.v6i2.3646

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates how the organizational commitment of local governments is linked to the adoption of digital public services in the first year of President Prabowo Subianto administration (2024-2025).

Methodology: The explanatory approach to quantitative research was applied in the current study with references to primary data obtained via local government officials and secondary data provided by UN E-Government Survey 2024. Simple linear regression was employed to determine the impact of organizational commitment on the digital implementation of public services.

Results: The findings revealed a positive and statistically significant correlation between organizational commitment and digital public service implementation (ß = 0.642; p = 0.001), with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.535. This outcome indicates that the more committed an organization is, the more local government officials increase the effectiveness, transparency, and efficiency of digital public services.

Conclusions: To successfully digitalize local government, supportive work culture, adaptive leadership, and building digital capacity should be concepts that strengthen organizational commitment.

Limitations: In this research, the regions considered are selected, and the first year of the administration of Prabowo Subianto is considered, thereby limiting generalization.

Contributions: This study provides empirical data on how commitment to the organization is a critical predictor of digital public service execution in the initial stages of the current Indonesian government.

Keywords

Bureaucratic Reform Digital Public Services Local Government Organizational Commitment Prabowo Subianto

How to Cite

Setiawan, D. R. (2026). Relationship between Local Government Commitment and Digital Public Service Implementation Under Prabowo Subianto. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 6(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.35912/jgas.v6i2.3646

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Abdussamad, Z., Karinda, K., Nursin, E., & Sandewa, F. (2024). E-government di Indonesia: Sebuah analisis bibliometrik dan dampaknya pada pengembangan kajian administrasi publik. Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa, 5(2), 15. doi:https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v5i2.111
  2. Adedeji, A. O. (2023). Analysis of good governance as an earmark of distinctive federalism in Nigeria Federation. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 2(2), 147-158. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jgas.v2i2.1474
  3. Alim, M. Z. (2024). The role of waste banks in realizing good environmental governance in Bandarlampung City. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 3(1), 51-61. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jgas.v3i1.1804
  4. Amin, M. S. (2022). Organizational commitment, competence on job satisfaction and lecturer performance: Social learning theory approach. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 2(1), 40-56. doi:https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v2i1.156
  5. Badrianto, Y., & Astuti, D. (2023). Peran kepuasan kerja sebagai mediasi pada pengaruh komitmen organisasi terhadap kinerja karyawan. JESYA (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Ekonomi Syariah), 6(1), 841-848. doi:https://doi.org/10.36778/jesya.v6i1.1013
  6. BPS. (2025). Jumlah Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) menurut tingkat pendidikan, jenis ASN, dan jenis kelamin (orang), Desember 2024. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/id
  7. Chatzopoulou, E.-C., Manolopoulos, D., & Agapitou, V. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and employee outcomes: interrelations of external and internal orientations with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(3), 795-817. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04872-7
  8. Di Giulio, M., & Vecchi, G. (2023). Implementing digitalization in the public sector. Technologies, agency, and governance. Public Policy and Administration, 38(2), 133-158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767211023283
  9. Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector: Plume.
  10. Heeks, R. (2001). Understanding e-Governance for Development.
  11. Katili, P., & Sakir, M. (2024). Peran budaya organisasi dalam pembentukan employee engagement melalui komitmen kerja aparatur sipil negara. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Ilmu, 3(4), 2815-2824.
  12. Kholida, F. N., A'yuni, N. L., & Yekti, A. (2024). The influence of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) on customer loyalty For Azzahra Herbal products in PT Naturindo Surya Niaga. Jurnal Agrisistem: Seri Sosek dan Penyuluhan, 20(2), 92-100. doi:https://doi.org/10.52625/j-agr-sosekpenyuluhan.v20i2.407
  13. Komarudin, D., Mu’minah, S., Praja, S. J., Setiawan, S., & Ruhana, F. (2025). Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE) sebagai instrumen inovasi pemerintah daerah dalam menjamin ketahanan pangan berkelanjutan. Scientific Journal of Reflection: Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 8(2), 575-583. doi:https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v8i2.1092
  14. Ly, B. (2024). Transforming commitment into performance: a study of digital transformation in the Cambodian public sector amidst a pandemic. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2333609
  15. Mehmood, K., Iftikhar, Y., Suhail, A., & Zia, A. (2024). How high-involvement work practices, public service motivation, and employees’ commitment influence employees' proactive work behavior: evidence from China. Asian Business & Management, 23(1), 55-81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-023-00260-3
  16. MENPANRB. (2025). Indeks SPBE Nasional Meningkat, Menteri Rini: Penguatan Integrasi Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Digital.
  17. Meyer, H. D. (2002). The new managerialism in education management: corporatization or organizational learning? Journal of Educational Administration, 40(6), 534-551. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210446027
  18. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
  19. Muhyi, H. A. (2021). Pengaruh komitmen afektif, komitmen berkelanjutan dan komitmen normatif terhadap kinerja pengurus koperasi di Kota Sukabumi, Jawa Barat. AdBispreneur: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Administrasi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 6(1), 53-65. doi:https://doi.org/10.24198/adbispreneur.v6i1.32494
  20. Mukhlis, M., Makhya, S., Yulianto, Y., & Aviv, M. (2025). The challenges of digital governance in the regions: Study in Central Lampung Regency, Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 5(1), 33-46. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jgas.v5i1.2448
  21. Nurlaela, S., Raya, A. B., & Hariadi, S. S. (2022). Information technology utilization of young educated farmers in agricultural entrepreneurship. Agro Ekonomi, 33(1), 11-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.22146/ae.64524
  22. Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king?. Public Administration, 89(4), 1335-1350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x
  23. Park, J. J., Mogg, R., Smith, G. E., Nakimuli-Mpungu, E., Jehan, F., Rayner, C. R., Reis, G. (2021). How COVID-19 has fundamentally changed clinical research in global health. The Lancet Global Health, 9(5), 711-720. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30542-8
  24. Pratama, A. B. (2020). The landscape of public service innovation in Indonesia: A comprehensive analysis of its characteristic and trend. Innovation & Management Review, 17(1), 25-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-11-2018-0080
  25. Putri, A. M., Syamsu, S., & Triono, A. (2024). Policy to replace electronic card into population digital in South Lampung Regency. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 4(1), 19-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jgas.v4i1.1919
  26. Ramadhan, R. (2024). In konsep good governance dalam perspektif pelayanan publik: sebuah tinjauan literatur. Saraq Opat: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 6(1), 55-67. doi:https://doi.org/10.55542/saraqopat.v6i1.328
  27. Roziqin, A., Kamil, M., Romadhan, A. A., & Zakaria, I. (2026). The dark side of local public sector innovation: insights from SAMPADE innovation. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 17(2), 256-276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-01-2024-0001
  28. Sari, S. M. (2024). Dampak digitalisasi terhadap birokrasi: Peluang dan tantangan dalam era pemerintahan terbuka. Dinamika Governance: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 14(2), 93-99. doi:https://doi.org/10.33005/jdg.v14i2.4848
  29. Sawir, M. (2020). Birokrasi Pelayanan Publik Konsep, Teori, dan Aplikasi: Deepublish.
  30. Seran, O. B., Neolaka, M. N. B. C., & Gana, F. (2021). Improving the capacity of the Head of the sub civil service in regional apparatus organisation of the government in Malaka district. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 1(1), 15-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jgas.v1i1.358
  31. Setiawan, I., Sururama, R., & Nurdin, I. (2022). Implementasi kebijakan penyederhanaan organisasi di kementerian pendayagunaan aparatur negara dan reformasi birokrasi. Jurnal Terapan Pemerintahan Minangkabau, 2(1), 12-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.33701/jtpm.v2i1.2380
  32. Sudirman, F. A., & Saidin, S. (2022). Pemerintahan berbasis elektronik (e-government) dan pembangunan berkelanjutan: Reviu literatur sistematis: Reviu literatur sistematis. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 21(1), 44-58. doi:https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v21i1.269
  33. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
  34. Torfing, J., Ferlie, E., Juki?, T., & Ongaro, E. (2021). A theoretical framework for studying the co-creation of innovative solutions and public value. Policy & Politics, 49(2), 189-209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16108172803520
  35. Tresiana, N., Duadji, N., & Jayamuna, I. M. (2024). Building agility and adaptive governance through digital bureaucracy ecosystem for innovative public policy. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi, 21(2), 181-196. doi:https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v21i2.1186
  36. Ukwuoma, H. C., Cirman, N. E., & Oye, P. O. (2022). The role of e-Government in overcoming the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 2(1), 79-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jgas.v2i1.1157
  37. Ulfa, S. N., & Frinaldi, A. (2025). Inovasi pemerintah daerah dalam penerapan kebijakan publik dan pelayanan publik. SOCIAL: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPS, 5(2), 610-621. doi:https://doi.org/10.51878/social.v5i2.5965
  38. Weiss, J. (2025). Digitizing bureaucracy: Insights from the digital transformation of Germany’s local government sector Digital Transformation in European Public Services: Complexities, Challenges, and Good Practices (pp. 79-105): Springer.
  39. Widnyani, I. A. P. S., Anantanathorn, A., & Rahayu, N. M. P. (2024). The urgency of public service malls in realizing good governance in Indonesia. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies, 2(4), 225-233. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jomaps.v2i4.2845
  40. Yani, A., & Sari, D. P. (2025). Organizational leadership in accelerating digital transformation. International Journal of Humanities, Management and Social Science (IJ-HuMaSS), 8(1), 31-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.ij-humass-0801.835
  41. Yin, L. (2025). Leadership, institutional autonomy, and cross-sector collaboration: Catalysts for change in a survey of China's public sector employees. Acta Psychologica, 255, 104916. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104916
  42. Yulianita, A., Subardin, S., & Zulfikri, Z. (2024). Government size and digital inequality in Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 4(1), 31-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jgas.v4i1.1981
  43. Yuniasih, A. W., Al Ghoza, H. A., Antyaningrum, R., Rahma, S. A., Istiqomah, W., & A'yuni, N. R. L. (2024). Pengaruh motivasi dan lingkungan kampus terhadap minat berwirausaha mahasiswa pertanian di Polbangtan Yogyakarta Magelang. JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Agribisnis): Jurnal Agribisnis dan Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 9(4), 317-326. doi:https://doi.org/10.37149/jia.v9i4.1292
  44. Yusuf, M. A., Herman, T., Abraham, A., & Rukmana, H. (2024). Analisis regresi linier sederhana dan berganda beserta penerapannya. Journal on Education, 6(02), 13331-13344.

Authors

Dodi Rahmat Setiawan
Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Manajemen STIAMI, Jakarta, Indonesia

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

View PDF

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): July
Section: Articles
WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email