JGBL

Article Details

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): February

Implementing Gender Equality Principles through the 30% Women’s Quota for Good Governance in Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.35912/jgbl.v1i1.4087

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the implementation of the principle of equality through the 30% women’s quota policy in parliament and to examine its contribution to the realization of good governance in Indonesia, particularly in terms of the quality of representation and the substantive contribution of female legislators.

Research Methodology: This study uses a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with stakeholders, participatory observation of legislative processes, and documentation studies of official policies and election reports. Data were analyzed thematically.

Results: The findings show that the quota policy has increased women’s participation at the nomination stage. However, a gap remains between administrative fulfillment and actual representation. Challenges include patriarchal culture, limited party support, high campaign costs, and non-strategic candidate placement. Despite this, female legislators contribute to gender-related policy issues.

Conclusions: The quota policy supports equality and inclusive governance but requires stronger institutional support and consistent implementation.

Limitations: This study is limited by its qualitative scope and reliance on selected stakeholders, which may not fully represent all regions or political contexts in Indonesia.

Contributions: This study contributes to public policy and governance by providing insights into improving gender quota effectiveness.

Keywords

30% Quota for Women Gender Equality Patriarchy Women's Political Participation

References

  1. Aspinall, E., White, S., & Savirani, A. (2021). Women’s political representation in Indonesia: who wins and how? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(1), 3-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103421989720
  2. Bans-Akutey, A. (2025). Twenty-five years of mainstreaming gender in development: A review. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 6(1), 73-87. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v6i1.2746
  3. Clayton, A. (2021). How do electoral gender quotas affect policy? Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 235-252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102019
  4. Clayton, A., O'Brien, D. Z., & Piscopo, J. M. (2019). All male panels? Representation and democratic legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science, 63(1), 113-129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12391
  5. Damayanti, K., Anisti, C. N., Rizanul, R. C., & Ummah, A. (2024). Analisis kebijakan kuota 30% keterwakilan perempuan dalam politik Indonesia. ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 4(2), 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v4i2.2026
  6. De Acutis, C., Weber, A., & Wurm, E. (2024). The effects of board gender quotas: A meta-analysis. Labour Economics, 91, 102634. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102634
  7. Dhesi, C. (2025). The Influence of Patriarchal Culture on Women's Participation in Local Politics. Journal of Social, Culture & Humanitarian Research, 1(1), 01-09.
  8. Firdaus, F., & Wulandari, R. A. (2023). Implications of Low Women's Representation: Strategies and Challenges Towards Gender Equality in Indonesian Politics. Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society, 5(2), 138-153. doi:https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v5i2.383
  9. Fredman, S. (2016). Substantive equality revisited. International journal of constitutional law, 14(3), 712-738. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow043
  10. Hermansen, S. S. L. (2025). Lingering bias: The effects of legislated gender quotas on representation quality in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 26(1), 66-95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165241302656
  11. Hilmawan, H. (2019). Implementasi Sistem Pemilu Terhadap Keterwakilan Perempuan Dalam Parlemen Di Negara Indonesia Dan Australia. aspirasi, 9(2), 104-111.
  12. Istriyani, R. (2018). Democracy Today: Assessing Democracy Phenomenon in Indonesia. POLITEA, 1(2), 75-84. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/politea.v1i2.4487
  13. Jabeen, M., & Awan, S. M. (2017). Gender quotas as an instrument for women’s empowerment in legislatures. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 132-142.
  14. Jensen, M. D., & Wang, S. (2025). Contagious representation? How regime type conditions the effect of legislative gender quotas on equal access to state jobs. Democratization, 32(5), 1308-1328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2025.2465882
  15. Khelghat-Doost, H., & Sibly, S. (2020). The impact of patriarchy on women’s political participation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(3), 396-409.
  16. Lambert, P., & Pineda Moquete, M. A. (2025). Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Evidence from Municipal Governments in the Dominican Republic. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 46(3), 207-226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2025.2507551
  17. Linthin, H. N., & Torobi, R. J. (2022). Implementasi Kuota 30 Persen Keterwakilan Perempuan Pada Pemilihan Legislatif di Kota Jayapura Periode Tahun 2019-2024. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 5, 92-101. doi:https://doi.org/10.31957/jkp.v5i2.2432
  18. Makmun, M., & Yandi, Y. (2025). An Analysis of Women's Representation in Parliament: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Other Countries Around the World. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(6), 4620-4631. doi:https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2145
  19. Muthanna, A., & Sang, G. (2023). A conceptual model of the factors affecting education policy implementation. Education Sciences, 13(3), 260. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030260
  20. Mwesigwa, D., & Wahid, K. A. (2021). Relevance of youth representation through political proportions in Uganda. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 1(1), 29-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jgas.v1i1.330
  21. Qizi, K. Z. S. (2025). Modern methodological principles in developing phonetic competence: Activation, integrativeness, and individual approach. Advances in Management and Business Studies, 1(1), 19-32. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ambus.v1i1.3748
  22. Reidinger, V. (2025). How Men React to Shifts in Gender Representation: Ignored Interests? Good for Society? Political Research Quarterly, 78(4), 1394-1407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129251364219
  23. Rosen, J. (2017). Gender quotas for women in national politics: A comparative analysis across development thresholds. Social Science Research, 66, 82-101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.01.008
  24. Sabeel Khan, M. (2025). Gender Quotas, Context, and Substantive Representation: a Literature Review. Desafíos, 37(2), 1-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.15452
  25. Smith, B. (2007). Good governance and development: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  26. Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R. V., & Lorenz, R. (2015). Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. Journal of business ethics, 128(2), 233-251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2083-1
  27. Venturini, G. (2025). Do gender quotas increase political knowledge? European Journal of Political Research, 64(3), 1142-1164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12736
  28. Zerine, I., Biswas, Y. A., Doha, M. Z., Meghla, H. M., & Polas, M. R. H. (2025). Data-Driven Sustainability: How Predictive Analytics ShapeSupply Chain Performance. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 6(4), 433-446. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v6i4.2613
  29. Zheng, H. (2026). Crisis-driven governance reforms: An analytical framework of institutional capacity, leadership, and collaboration in global governance. Chinese Public Administration Review, 17(1), 19-38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754251335231
WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email