JICTL

Article Details

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): March

Social Media and Marital Relations among Married Women: A Scoping Review and Islamic Ethical Analysis Using the Maqasid al-Sharia Framework

https://doi.org/10.35912/jictl.v2i1.3967

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine how social media use influences marital relations among married women and interpret recurring relational patterns through the maq??id al-shar??a framework, integrating empirical research with Islamic ethical analysis.

Research Methodology: A scoping review guided by the PRISMA-ScR framework was conducted using major academic databases. Peer-reviewed empirical and theoretical studies that addressed social media and marital dynamics were included. Data were systematically extracted and analyzed using thematic synthesis. The identified themes were subsequently interpreted through the five classical maq??id objectives: preservation of religion, life (emotional well-being), intellect, lineage (family integrity), and property (economic trust).

Results: Five dominant themes emerged: emotional boundary reconfiguration, surveillance and jealousy, social comparison, gendered moral scrutiny, and digital economic participation. The findings indicate that social media functions as a relational amplifier, intensifying the pre-existing dynamics of trust, insecurity, and negotiation rather than serving as a deterministic cause of marital instability. Maq??id-based analysis demonstrates ethical convergence between empirical findings and Islamic objectives concerning emotional stability, moral conduct, rational discernment, family cohesion, and economic transparency.

Conclusions: Social media reshapes marital interactions structurally and symbolically, requiring contextual and ethically grounded evaluations. The maq??id framework provides a structured lens for assessing digital intimacy within marriage, emphasizing welfare, justice, and relationship accountability.

Limitations: This review is limited to English-language publications and heterogeneous methodologies without a quantitative effect-size assessment.

Contribution: This study advances interdisciplinary scholarship by bridging digital sociology and Islamic ethical reasoning and offering a structured normative framework for faith-sensitive digital literacy and marital counseling.

Keywords

Digital Intimacy Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿa Marital Relations Married Women Social Media

How to Cite

Jajere, Z. M., & Kannike, U. M. M. (2026). Social Media and Marital Relations among Married Women: A Scoping Review and Islamic Ethical Analysis Using the Maqasid al-Sharia Framework. Journal of Indigenous Culture, Tourism, and Language, 2(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.35912/jictl.v2i1.3967

References

  1. Blanc-Brillon, J. L., Fortin, J.-S., Lafrance, L., & Hétu, S. (2025). The Associations between Social Comparison on Social Media and Young Adults’ Mental Health. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1597241
  2. Bouffard, S., Giglio, D., & Zheng, Z. (2022). Social Media and Romantic Relationship: Excessive Social Media Use Leads to Relationship Conflicts, Negative Outcomes, and Addiction via Mediated Pathways. Social Science Computer Review, 40(6), 1523-1541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211013566
  3. Chen, S., Tilburg, W. A. P. v., & Leman, P. J. (2023). Women's Self-Objectification and Strategic Self-Presentation on Social Media. Psychology of women quarterly, 47(2), 266-282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221143751
  4. Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. R. (2013). Cheating, Breakup, and Divorce: Is Facebook Use to Blame?. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(10), 717-720. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0424
  5. Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating Social Resources on Social Network Sites: Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Their Role in Social Capital Processes. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 19(4), 855-870. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12078
  6. Fariña-Sánchez, M., & Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E. (2024). Gender and Digital Rights: An Empirical Study among Young Entrepreneurs. Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15010012
  7. González-Rivera, J. A., & Hernández-Gato, I. (2019). Conflicts in Romantic Relationships over Facebook Use: Validation and Psychometric Study. Behavioral Sciences, 9(2), 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9020018
  8. Hampton, K. N. (2016). Persistent and Pervasive Community: New Communication Technologies and the Future of Community. American behavioral scientist, 60(1), 101-124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215601714
  9. Horne, R. M., & Johnson, M. D. (2019). A Labor of Love? Emotion Work in Intimate Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1190-1209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518756779
  10. Jeanfreau, M. M., Noguchi, K., Mong, M. D., & Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H. (2018). Financial Infidelity in Couple Relationships. Journal of financial therapy, 9(1), 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-9771.1159
  11. Mao, A., & Raguram, A. (2009). Online Infidelity: The New Challenge to Marriages. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 51(4), 302-304. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.58299
  12. McDaniel, B. T., Drouin, M., & Cravens, J. D. (2017). Do You Have Anything to Hide? Infidelity-Related Behaviors on Social Media Sites and Marital Satisfaction. Computers in human behavior, 66, 88-95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.031
  13. Métellus, S., Vaillancourt?Morel, M. P., Brassard, A., & Daspe, M. È. (2025). Attachment Anxiety and Relationship Satisfaction in the Digital Era: The Contribution of Social Media Jealousy and Electronic Partner Surveillance. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 51(4), 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70074
  14. Muhammad, A. S., Ismail, B. A., & Muhammad, D. u. B. (2025). Fake News, Social Media and National Security: World View and Islamic Perspective. Journal of Learning on History and Social Sciences, 2(11), 729-746. doi:https://doi.org/10.61796/jlhss.v2i11.1515
  15. Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More Information than You Ever Wanted: Does Facebook Bring Out the Green-Eyed Monster of Jealousy?. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 12(4), 441-444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0263
  16. Norton, A. M., & Baptist, J. (2014). Couple Boundaries for Social Networking in Middle Adulthood: Associations of Trust and Satisfaction. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-4-2
  17. Oluyemi, A. A., Adefemi, V. O., Odunlami, O. A., & Odigie, J. D. (2025). Digital Intimacy and Perception of Morality among Undergraduates of Crawford University, Igbesa, Ogun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Sub-Saharan African Research, 3(4), 225-241. doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18102112
  18. Omokhabi, A. A., Omokhabi, U. S., & Oloyede, T. O. (2025). Social Media Impact on Marital Conflict among Married Couples in Three Southwestern Nigerian States. Simulacra, 8(1), 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v8i1.27215
  19. Ouytsel, J. V., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., Willems, A.-S., & Dam, M. V. (2019). Adolescents’ Perceptions of Digital Media’s Potential to Elicit Jealousy, Conflict and Monitoring Behaviors within Romantic Relationships. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 13(3), 1-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2019-3-3
  20. Parsakia, K., & Rostami, M. (2023). Digital Intimacy: How Technology Shapes Friendships and Romantic Relationships. AI and Tech in Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(1), 27-34. doi:https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aitech.1.1.5
  21. Qian, Y., & Hu, Y. (2024). The Digitalization of Family Life: A Multilevel Conceptual Framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 86(5), 1160-1183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12983
  22. Sagioglou, C., & Greitemeyer, T. (2014). Facebook’s Emotional Consequences: Why Facebook Causes a Decrease in Mood and Why People Still Use It. Computers in human behavior, 35, 359-363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.003
  23. Saleh, M. S. M., Mehellou, A., & Omar, B. (2023). Maq??id al-Shar?’ah as Goal Framing for Sustainable Behaviours: A Conceptual Framework. Intellectual Discourse, 31(1), 161-182. doi:https://doi.org/10.31436/id.v31i1.1805
  24. Shabbir, T. (2021). Impact of Social Media on Interpersonal Communication between Student and a Teacher. Journal of Public Administration and Government, 3(2), 154-164. doi:https://doi.org/10.22487/jpag.v3i2.190
  25. Silva, H. M. (2025). The Reconfiguration of Social Bonds in the Digital Age: Virtual Connections vs. Face-to-Face Relationships. Nature Anthropology, 3(1), 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.70322/natanthropol.2025.10003
  26. Sullivan, K. T. (2021). Attachment Style and Jealousy in the Digital Age: Do Attitudes About Online Communication Matter?. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678542
  27. Torreon, L. C. (2020). Preserving Romantic Relationship through Social Media. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 12(1), 22-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2020/v12i130181
  28. Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., . . . Weeks, L. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of internal medicine, 169(7), 467-473. doi:https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
  29. Valenzuela, S., Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2014). Social Network Sites, Marriage Well-Being and Divorce: Survey and State-Level Evidence from the United States. Computers in human behavior, 36, 94-101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.034
  30. Wang, M. (2025). How Strangers Fall in Love in Games: Affective Infrastructures and Platformed Intimacy in China. Social media+ society, 11(4), 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251395404
Contact Us
WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email