Article Details
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): May
Fiscal burden and feasibility of minimum price support: A Scenario study
Abstract
Purpose: India’s MSP–procurement–PDS system, although framed as farmer support, functions largely as a consumer subsidy. With rice and wheat sold cheaply through the PDS and global prices close to the MSP, procurement mainly ensures price assurance. Expanding assured procurement to all MSP crops raises serious concerns regarding fiscal sustainability, administrative feasibility, and market distortions. This study evaluated the fiscal implications of alternative MSP reform pathways.
Methodology: Using 2024–2025 production, MSP, and wholesale price data, five scenarios were modelled: full procurement of all 23 MSP crops (upper bound); current-style procurement of 40% of paddy and wheat and 20% of others (baseline); baseline plus PDP at 10% of MSP for 20% of other crop output (partial PDP); baseline plus PDP at 20% of MSP for 40% of other output (enhanced PDP); and continued cereal procurement with universal PDP for other crops.
Results: Partial procurement results in payouts of approximately ?3.7 lakh crore (USD 40.3 billion) (1.12% of GDP) while concealing large storage and inventory risks. Hybrid models provide comparable income support with lower logistical burden. Universal PDP moderately increases outlays but expands coverage and avoids procurement inefficiencies. Even a broadened PDP system would cost approximately ?1.14 lakh crore (USD 12.4 billion).
Conclusions: Effective farmer price assurance does not require expanded procurement efforts. A gradual transition toward hybrid and PDP-based support can protect incomes, reduce inefficiencies, and clearly separate consumer subsidies from farmer income policy, offering a practical reform pathway for India and similar economies.
Limitations: This study uses a static, single-year framework and does not capture dynamic distributional factors.
Contributions: This study provides a fiscal comparison of MSP implementation pathways, introduces a hybrid procurement–PDP framework, and offers new evidence on extending income support to neglected crops and regions while minimizing fiscal expenditure.
Keywords
How to Cite
Download Citation
References
- Aayog, N. (2017). Changing structure of rural economy of india implications for employment and growth. National Institution for Transforming India, Government of India, 1-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17270.09280
- Ahmad, N. N., & Khairatun, S. N. (2020). The understanding of food fraud among consumers in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Tourism and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 31-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/joste.v2i1.355
- Birthal, P. S., Hazrana, J., & Negi, D. S. (2020). Diversification in Indian agriculture towards high value crops: Multilevel determinants and policy implications. Land use Policy, 91, 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104427
- Chand, R. (2022). Indian Agriculture Towards 2030—Need for a Transformative Vision. In R. Chand, P. Joshi, & S. Khadka (Eds.), Indian Agriculture Towards 2030 (pp. 1-7). Singapore: Springer.
- Chand, R. (2025). Reimagining agriculture for growth, poverty, nutrition, and sustainability. Agricultural Economics, 56(3), 485-492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70015
- Chand, R., Raju, S., & Reddy, A. A. (2015). Assessing performance of pulses and competing crops based on market prices and natural resource valuation. Journal of Food Legumes, 28(4), 335-340.
- Dorward, A. (2012). The short-and medium-term impacts of rises in staple food prices. Food Security, 4(4), 633-645. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-012-0210-3
- Dorward, A., Kydd, J., Morrison, J., & Urey, I. (2004). A policy agenda for pro-poor agricultural growth. World Development, 32(1), 73-89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.012
- Gardner, B. L. (2002). American Agriculture in the Twentieth Century: How it Flourished and What it Cost. London: Harvard University Press.
- Glauber, J. W., & Sinha, T. (2021). Procuring Food Stocks under World Trade Organization farm Subsidy Rules: Finding a Permanent Solution. Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
- Gulati, A., Das, R., & Winter-Nelson, A. (2024). Reducing Post-Harvest Losses in India: Farmer-Level Interventions and Grain Management Strategies. India: AF PRESS.
- Huang, J., & Yang, G. (2017). Understanding recent challenges and new food policy in China. Global food security, 12, 119-126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.10.002
- Jha, S., Kubo, K., & Ramaswami, B. (2016). International Trade and risk sharing in the global rice market: The impact of foreign and domestic supply shocks. Asian Development Review, 33(1), 162-182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ADEV_a_00064
- Matthew, U. J., & Onwuzor, O. A. (2023). Perception of Violence and food security in emohua local government area of Rivers State, Nigeria. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 4(1), 35-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v4i1.1370
- Mwesigwa, D. (2021). Consequence of Covid-19 lockdown on household food security: Voices from Hoima City, Uganda. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2(1), 55-65. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v2i1.765
- Naa, O., Umar, H., & Ngutra, R. (2024). Analysis of the effect of Supplementary Food Provision (PMT) budget distribution on improving child nutrition for stunting eradication in Mimika Regency. Global Academy of Business Studies, 1(3), 161-172. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/gabs.v1i3.3477
- Negi, D. S., Birthal, P. S., Roy, D., & Hazrana, J. (2020). Market Access, Price Policy and Diversification in Indian Agriculture. Mumbai: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.
- OECD. (2023a). Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2023: Adapting Agriculture to Climate Change Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/agricultural-policy-monitoring-and-evaluation-2023_b14de474-en.html
- OECD. (2023b). OECD?FAO Agricultural Outlook 2023?2032. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2023-2032_08801ab7-en.html
- Reddy, A. A., & Anugu, A. R. (2025). Market and technological reforms in indian agriculture: needs for a wholistic approach. Journal of the Indian Association of Social Science Institutions, 44(4), 854-891. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5986715
- Resnick, D. (2024). Political economy of agriculture and food policy in Africa. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 16(1), 255-276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-101722-080332
- Riskarini, D., Putriana, L., Prakoso, R., & Martiza, S. (2025). Professional commitment mediates the effects of discipline, environment, and motivation on employee performance at Indonesia’s Ministry of Agriculture. Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 5(4), 387-400. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v5i4.3593
- Sadoulet, E., Janvry, A. D., & Davis, B. (2001). Cash transfer programs with income multipliers: procampo in Mexico. World Development, 29(6), 1043-1056. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00018-3
- Salant, S., Shobe, W., & Uler, N. (2022). The Effects of “Nonbinding” Price Floors. European economic review, 145, 1-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104122
- Shavqiyev, E., & Davirova, D. H. (2025). Synergistic Criteria and indicators for evaluating small enterprise performance. Studies in Economy and Public Policy, 1(1), 1-5. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/sepp.v1i1.2896
- Srinivasa, A. K., Praveen, K., Surendran Padmaja, S., Nithyashree, M., & Jha, G. K. (2023). Does a farmer's knowledge of Minimum Support Price (MSP) affect the Farm-Gate Price? Evidence from India. Journal of Economics and Development, 25(4), 302-316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-04-2023-0079
- Sutrisno, E., Duwi, S., Anita, R., Eksa, R., & Jenny Yudha, U. (2024). Study on the Utilization of village funds to support food security in Glagah Lamongan District, East Java. Journal of Indigenous Culture, Tourism, and Language, 1(1), 15-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jictl.v1i1.1734
- Timmer, C. P. (1989). Food Price Policy: The rationale for government intervention. Food Policy, 14(1), 17-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9192(89)90023-7
- Vohra, M., & Sharma, V. (2024). Revitalizing Agricultural price mechanisms: A review and call for enhancement. CABI Reviews, 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews.2024.0019
- Wang, S. D., Loftus, P., Pang, R. D., & Kirkpatrick, M. G. (2021). Impact of self-efficacy on daily intention to not smoke. Addictive Behaviors, 118(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106877
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.