Litigation and non-litigation approaches in Islamic Banking Syariah resolution

https://doi.org/10.35912/jomabs.v2i2.2683
Published: Jan 23, 2025

Abstract:

Purpose: Financial institutions, which function as intermediaries in the economy, have an important role in facilitating the flow of funds between those who have excess funds and those who lack funds. One form of financial institution that is growing rapidly in Indonesia is Islamic banking, which operates based on Islamic sharia principles, such as mudharabah, to support fair and riba-free financing. However, in its implementation, disputes often arise between customers, banks, and entrepreneurs, especially related to the implementation of mudharabah contracts. To handle this kind of dispute, Law No. 21 of 2008 on Sharia Banking provides two channels for dispute resolution: first, through litigation in the Religious Court, and second, through non-litigation channels, namely by using alternative dispute resolution institutions such as the National Sharia Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS).

Results: The arrangement of this dispute resolution mechanism is very important to maintain integrity and compliance with sharia principles, ensure legal certainty, and provide a sense of security for all parties involved in Islamic banking transactions in Indonesia.

Keywords:
1. financial institutions
2. Islamic banking
3. disputes
4. litigation
5. non-litigation
Authors:
Amda Usnaka
Islamic University of Bandung, Indonesia
View PDF
How to Cite
Usnaka, A. (2025). Litigation and non-litigation approaches in Islamic Banking Syariah resolution. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Business Studies, 2(2), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.35912/jomabs.v2i2.2683
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): February
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

    Abbas, D. S. (2017). Mediasi: dalam hukum syariah, hukum adat, dan hukum nasional: Prenada Media.

    Abu, S. E. (2024). Audit committee characteristics and firm financial performance of quoted industrial goods firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 5(4), 445-458.

    Akabom, I. A., & Ejabu, F. E. (2018). Effects of thin capitalization and international law on performance of multinational companies in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management ISSN, 4(2), 2018.

    Arifin, J. (2008). Peradilan agama dalam bingkai reformasi hukum di Indonesia: Kencana.

    Batubara, R. A. R. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah Secara Arbitrase Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (BASYARNAS). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum [JIMHUM], 2(4).

    Bisri, H. (2000). Peradilan agama di Indonesia: RajaGrafindo Persada.

    Cahyadi, T. N. (2016). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH (Kritik atas Contradictio in Terminis Pasal 55 Undang-undang no. 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah). JESI (Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia), 1(2), 15-29.

    Djamil, F. (1994). Arbitrase Dalam Perspektif Sejarah Islam. Badan Arbitrase Muamalat Indonesia bekerjasama dengan Bank Muamalat.

    Ghofur Anshori, A. (2007). Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 3Tahun 2006 (Sejarah, Kedudukan, Dan Kewenangan): Yogyakarta: UII Press.

    Harahap, M. Y. (2006). Arbitrase. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

    Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum acara perdata: tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan: Sinar Grafika.

    Harahap, M. Y. (2023). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata: Sinar Grafika.

    Imaniyati, N. S. (2008). Hukum Perbankan.

    Mardani, M. (2011). Hukum Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

    Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum.

    Maskur, F., Basir, A., & Dewi, S. R. (2024). Influence of job satisfaction and management information systems on employee performance in PT. Pawnshop in Palopo City. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies, 2(3), 325-334.

    Muhammad, A., & Murniati, R. (2000). Lembaga Keuangan dan Pembiayaan: Bandung Citra Aditya Bakti.

    Nurnaningsih, A. (2012). Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

    Nwosu, C. C., Obalum, D. C., & Ananti, M. O. (2024). Artificial intelligence in public service and governance in Nigeria. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 4(2), 109-120.

    Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.

    Rachmawati, R. S., & Wibisono, D. (2024). Customer satisfaction performance evaluation at PT PLN (Persero) West Java using the Malcolm Baldrige criteria for performance excellence. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Business Studies, 1(4), 451-461.

    Sabiq, S. (2017). Fiqih Sunnah Jilid 1: Republika Penerbit.

    Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. (No Title).

    Soemartono, G. P. (2006). Arbitrase dan mediasi di Indonesia: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

    Umam, K. (2009). Hukum ekonomi Islam: dinamika dan perkembangan di Indonesia: Instan Lib.

    Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung.

    Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan.

    Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.

    Zahedi, M., Abbasi, M., & Khanachah, S. N. (2020). Providing a lean and agile supply chain model in project-based organizations. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 1(3), 213-233.

  1. Abbas, D. S. (2017). Mediasi: dalam hukum syariah, hukum adat, dan hukum nasional: Prenada Media.
  2. Abu, S. E. (2024). Audit committee characteristics and firm financial performance of quoted industrial goods firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 5(4), 445-458.
  3. Akabom, I. A., & Ejabu, F. E. (2018). Effects of thin capitalization and international law on performance of multinational companies in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management ISSN, 4(2), 2018.
  4. Arifin, J. (2008). Peradilan agama dalam bingkai reformasi hukum di Indonesia: Kencana.
  5. Batubara, R. A. R. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah Secara Arbitrase Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (BASYARNAS). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum [JIMHUM], 2(4).
  6. Bisri, H. (2000). Peradilan agama di Indonesia: RajaGrafindo Persada.
  7. Cahyadi, T. N. (2016). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH (Kritik atas Contradictio in Terminis Pasal 55 Undang-undang no. 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah). JESI (Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia), 1(2), 15-29.
  8. Djamil, F. (1994). Arbitrase Dalam Perspektif Sejarah Islam. Badan Arbitrase Muamalat Indonesia bekerjasama dengan Bank Muamalat.
  9. Ghofur Anshori, A. (2007). Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 3Tahun 2006 (Sejarah, Kedudukan, Dan Kewenangan): Yogyakarta: UII Press.
  10. Harahap, M. Y. (2006). Arbitrase. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  11. Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum acara perdata: tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan: Sinar Grafika.
  12. Harahap, M. Y. (2023). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata: Sinar Grafika.
  13. Imaniyati, N. S. (2008). Hukum Perbankan.
  14. Mardani, M. (2011). Hukum Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
  15. Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum.
  16. Maskur, F., Basir, A., & Dewi, S. R. (2024). Influence of job satisfaction and management information systems on employee performance in PT. Pawnshop in Palopo City. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies, 2(3), 325-334.
  17. Muhammad, A., & Murniati, R. (2000). Lembaga Keuangan dan Pembiayaan: Bandung Citra Aditya Bakti.
  18. Nurnaningsih, A. (2012). Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.
  19. Nwosu, C. C., Obalum, D. C., & Ananti, M. O. (2024). Artificial intelligence in public service and governance in Nigeria. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 4(2), 109-120.
  20. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.
  21. Rachmawati, R. S., & Wibisono, D. (2024). Customer satisfaction performance evaluation at PT PLN (Persero) West Java using the Malcolm Baldrige criteria for performance excellence. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Business Studies, 1(4), 451-461.
  22. Sabiq, S. (2017). Fiqih Sunnah Jilid 1: Republika Penerbit.
  23. Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. (No Title).
  24. Soemartono, G. P. (2006). Arbitrase dan mediasi di Indonesia: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  25. Umam, K. (2009). Hukum ekonomi Islam: dinamika dan perkembangan di Indonesia: Instan Lib.
  26. Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung.
  27. Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan.
  28. Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
  29. Zahedi, M., Abbasi, M., & Khanachah, S. N. (2020). Providing a lean and agile supply chain model in project-based organizations. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 1(3), 213-233.