The use of lie detectors (polygraphs) as evidence of expert statements in premeditated murder (Study of Decision Number 796/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt.Sel)
Abstract:
Purpose: This study aims to determine the importance of using a Polygraph in court in proving the premeditated murder case committed by Ferdy Sambo and the judge's considerations in deciding the premeditated murder case based on Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code.
Research Methodology: This study aims to determine the importance of using a Polygraph in court in proving the premeditated murder case committed by Ferdy Sambo and the judge's considerations in deciding the premeditated murder case based on Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code.
Results: The Panel of Judges in Ferdy Sambo's trial found the fact that Ferdy Sambo had been convoluted and inconsistent in providing information, so that the Public Prosecutor to strengthen his charges continued the trial with the agenda of hearing witnesses and hearing expert testimony. The results and analysis of the Polygraph examination are written reports included in the evidence in the Indonesian criminal evidence system such as documentary evidence, expert opinions, and guidelines. Willa Wahyuni?12/16/2022 Reading 3 minutes The Polygraph Machine is used at the request of the investigator based on the needs of the investigation of a criminal case.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Auma, Z., Obici, G., & Mwesigwa, D. (2022). Community Support Groups and Home-Based Care among Persons Living with HIV and AIDS in Lira District, Uganda. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(2), 69-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i2.1465
Chazawi, A. (2008). Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana korupsi. Bandung: PT. Alumni.
Chazawi, A. (2019). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana 1: Rajawali Pers.
Ekawati, D., & Yudoko, G. (2024). Strategy for Automation and Digitalization in Indonesian Aerospace Manufacturing. Jurnal Bisnis dan Pemasaran Digital, 3(2), 91-105. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jbpd.v3i2.4510
Gunadi, I. G. A., & Harjoko, A. (2012). Telaah Metode-metode Pendeteksi Kebohongan. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), 6(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.2150
Gustian, A. S., Respationo, S., Erniyanti, E., Anatami, D., & Parameshwara, P. (2022). Juridical analysis of the obligation to report drug offenders to law enforcement officials law enforcement. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 2(1), 45-51. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v2i1.1814
Hamzah, A. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harun, M. H. (1991). Penyidik dan Penuntut dalam Proses Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ishaq, I. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum : penulisan skripsi, tesis, serta disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Lamintang, P. A. F., & Lamintang, T. (2012). Delik-Delik Khusus Kejahatan Terhadap Nyawa, Tubuh, & Kesehatan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Lovina, L. (2020). Lovina, Kedudukan dan Keabsahan Hasil Pemeriksaan Poligraf dalam Sistem Pembuktian Pidana di Indonesia: Tinjauan Prinsip Keadilan yang Adil (Fair Trial). JURNAL JENTERA, 3(1).
Muhammad, R. (2007). Hukum acara pidana kontemporer: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Roy, S. (2022). Cybercrime and islamic law: Revisiting the advantageous and hiatus horizon (s). Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(2), 93-99. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i2.1367
Ruspian, R., Deliana, E., & Erdiansyah, E. (2019). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Mesin Polygraph dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Online Manusia, 6(2).
Soekanto, S. (2013). Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2009). Penelitian hukum normatif: suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sutama, I., Dewi, N. D. U., & Rahayu, L. R. (2023). Pengembangan Pariwisata dengan Community Based Tourism di Desa Wisata Penatih Denpasar. Jurnal Studi Perhotelan dan Pariwisata, 2(1), 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jspp.v2i1.2260
Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities: John Wiley & Sons.
Yusefin, V. F., & Chalil, S. M. (2018). Penggunaan Lie Detector (Alat Pendeteksi Kebohongan) dalam Proses Penyidikan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v17i2.58
- Auma, Z., Obici, G., & Mwesigwa, D. (2022). Community Support Groups and Home-Based Care among Persons Living with HIV and AIDS in Lira District, Uganda. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(2), 69-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i2.1465
- Chazawi, A. (2008). Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana korupsi. Bandung: PT. Alumni.
- Chazawi, A. (2019). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana 1: Rajawali Pers.
- Ekawati, D., & Yudoko, G. (2024). Strategy for Automation and Digitalization in Indonesian Aerospace Manufacturing. Jurnal Bisnis dan Pemasaran Digital, 3(2), 91-105. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jbpd.v3i2.4510
- Gunadi, I. G. A., & Harjoko, A. (2012). Telaah Metode-metode Pendeteksi Kebohongan. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), 6(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.2150
- Gustian, A. S., Respationo, S., Erniyanti, E., Anatami, D., & Parameshwara, P. (2022). Juridical analysis of the obligation to report drug offenders to law enforcement officials law enforcement. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 2(1), 45-51. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v2i1.1814
- Hamzah, A. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
- Harun, M. H. (1991). Penyidik dan Penuntut dalam Proses Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
- Ishaq, I. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum : penulisan skripsi, tesis, serta disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
- Lamintang, P. A. F., & Lamintang, T. (2012). Delik-Delik Khusus Kejahatan Terhadap Nyawa, Tubuh, & Kesehatan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
- Lovina, L. (2020). Lovina, Kedudukan dan Keabsahan Hasil Pemeriksaan Poligraf dalam Sistem Pembuktian Pidana di Indonesia: Tinjauan Prinsip Keadilan yang Adil (Fair Trial). JURNAL JENTERA, 3(1).
- Muhammad, R. (2007). Hukum acara pidana kontemporer: Citra Aditya Bakti.
- Roy, S. (2022). Cybercrime and islamic law: Revisiting the advantageous and hiatus horizon (s). Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(2), 93-99. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i2.1367
- Ruspian, R., Deliana, E., & Erdiansyah, E. (2019). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Mesin Polygraph dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Online Manusia, 6(2).
- Soekanto, S. (2013). Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
- Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2009). Penelitian hukum normatif: suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
- Sutama, I., Dewi, N. D. U., & Rahayu, L. R. (2023). Pengembangan Pariwisata dengan Community Based Tourism di Desa Wisata Penatih Denpasar. Jurnal Studi Perhotelan dan Pariwisata, 2(1), 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jspp.v2i1.2260
- Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities: John Wiley & Sons.
- Yusefin, V. F., & Chalil, S. M. (2018). Penggunaan Lie Detector (Alat Pendeteksi Kebohongan) dalam Proses Penyidikan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v17i2.58
