IJFAM

Article Details

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2026): March

The Effectiveness of the Si Kemad Information System in Improving Public Services at DPMPTSP Dharmasraya

https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v7i4.3115
31 Mar 2026

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Community Satisfaction Information System (Si Kemad) in enhancing public services at the Office of Investment and One-Stop Integrated Services (DPMPTSP) in the Dharmasraya Regency.

Research Methodology: This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach and was conducted at the DPMPTSP Dharmasraya. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, direct observations, and document analysis. The informants included agency leaders, system operators, frontline staff, and service users. The Si Kemad function serves as a digital survey system based on Google Forms and is periodically evaluated.

Results: The results indicate that Si Kemad is moderately effective in improving community participation, expediting service delivery, and supporting data-driven decision-making. However, challenges remain, particularly in areas such as public socialization, human resource limitations, and underdeveloped technological infrastructure.

Conclusions: The Si Kemad program has contributed to improving the quality of public services. However, further optimization and stronger technical and institutional support are necessary to maximize its potential.

Limitations: This study was limited to a single institutional setting and applied a qualitative approach; thus, the findings may not be generalizable to broader contexts.

Contributions: This study contributes to the advancement of digital-based public service models, particularly in regional government settings. These findings offer insights for practitioners, scholars, and policymakers in public administration and government information systems.

Keywords

Digital Innovation Effectiveness Information System Public Satisfaction Public Service

How to Cite

Sepriani, R., Purwanto, K. ., & Ferdinal, A. . (2026). The Effectiveness of the Si Kemad Information System in Improving Public Services at DPMPTSP Dharmasraya . International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 7(4), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v7i4.3115

References

  1. Afiyah, S. (2024). The impact of e-government services, citizen participation, and transparency on public trust in government. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(6), 1246-1261. doi:https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i6.200
  2. Al-rawahna, A. S. M., Chen, S.-C., & Hung, C.-W. (2019). The barriers of e-government success: An empirical study from Jordan. Available at SSRN 3498847, 9(2), 1-18.
  3. Alfiani, H., Aditya, S. K., Lusa, S., Sensuse, D. I., Putro, P. A. W., & Indriasari, S. (2024). E-government issues in developing countries using TOE and UTAUT frameworks: A systematic review. Policy & Governance Review, 8(2), 169-191. doi:https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v8i2.932
  4. Anzar, M., Hasbullah, H., & Asraf, I. (2024). The influence of digital literacy on citizen engagement and participation in e-government services for inclusive digital governance. Journal Social Civilecial, 2(2), 87-98. doi:https://doi.org/10.71435/610495
  5. Asmawanti-S, D., Afiah, N. N., Ritchi, H., & Suharman, H. (2025). Literature review of government digital services based on public value theory and citizen perspectives. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 1-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2518494
  6. Bougherra, M., Shaikh, A. K., Yenigun, C., & Hassan-Yari, H. (2023). E-government performance in democracies versus autocracies. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(7), 3275-3294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-01-2022-3124
  7. Clifton, J., Díaz Fuentes, D., & Llamosas García, G. (2020). ICT-enabled co-production of public services: Barriers and enablers. A systematic review. Information Polity, 25(1), 25-48. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190122
  8. Fathoni, A., Kusnadi, E., Yuraida, N., & Afiyah, S. (2025). Digital transformation of public services in improving community satisfaction: A case study of local government institutions. Journal of the American Institute, 2(9), 1220-1229. doi:https://doi.org/10.71364/h44pch39
  9. Gupta, K. P., Singh, S., & Bhaskar, P. (2016). Citizen adoption of e-government: a literature review and conceptual framework. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 12(2), 160-185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2016.076134
  10. Gupta, P., Hooda, A., Jeyaraj, A., Seddon, J. J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2025). Trust, risk, privacy and security in e-government use: insights from a MASEM analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 27(3), 1089-1105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10497-8
  11. Hassan, B. (2023). Leveraging data-driven insights for enhancing e-government services. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Trends, 3(1), 110-117. doi:https://doi.org/10.71465/ijictt41
  12. Ma, L., & Zheng, Y. (2019). National e-government performance and citizen satisfaction: a multilevel analysis across European countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 506-526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317703691
  13. Madsen, H. L. (2020). Business model innovation and the global ecosystem for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247(5), 119102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119102
  14. Mirza, D., Lastri, N., & Aditiya, V. (2025). Optimizing digital public services for enhanced citizen satisfaction and transparent governance. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 13(6), 4563-4574. doi:https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i6.4100
  15. Novriando, A., Purnomo, E. P., & Salsabila, L. (2020). Efektivitas “Jogja Smart Service” terhadap pelayanan publik di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 13(2), 68-75. doi:https://doi.org/10.31947/jgov.v13i2.8817
  16. Okigbo, F. C., Mbamalu, S., & Iruogu, K. (2025). Digital marketing transformation through artificial intelligence: A study of Nigerian small businesses. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 7(3), 419-433. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v7i3.3383
  17. Omweri, F. (2024). A systematic literature review of e-government implementation in developing countries: examining urban-rural disparities, institutional capacity, and socio-cultural factors in the context of local governance and progress towards SDG 16.6. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(8), 1173-1199. doi:https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.808088
  18. Pandey, J. K. (2024). Evaluating public service value within collaborative e-governance: a study in the Indian context. Digital Transformation and Society, 3(2), 197-213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/DTS-08-2023-0065
  19. Paselle, E., Nurrahman, M. A., Taufik, M., & Fatmala, A. N. P. (2025). E-Government and citizen participation: enhancing public accountability through digital technology. International Journal for Science Review, 2(2), 74-84. doi:https://doi.org/10.71364/ijfsr.v2i2.13
  20. Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Le, M. T. T., & Nguyen, N. L. (2023). E-government service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: evidence from a newly emerging country. Journal of Public Policy, 43(4), 812-833. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X23000296
  21. Prasetyo, B., Sumartono, E., Suherman, S., Mulyaningsih, M., & Kusnadi, E. (2024). Citizen-Centric approaches to e-government for improving public service delivery. The Journal of Academic Science, 1(7), 858-867. doi:https://doi.org/10.59613/vpsga281
  22. Rahman, S. A. Y., Rahayu, A., & Hendrayati, H. (2025). Digital marketing evolution: Understanding the role of AI and Big Data in shaping marketing strategies. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 7(2), 197-211. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v7i2.2593
  23. Reynilda, R., Nugraha, A. R., Sako, U., & Wibasuri, A. (2025). Governance innovation through e-government platforms: A study on service efficiency and citizen satisfaction. JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 9(3), 276-279. doi:https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v9i3.120
  24. Rodríguez-Hevía, L. F., Navío-Marco, J., & Ruíz-Gómez, L. M. (2020). Citizens’ involvement in E-government in the European Union: The rising importance of the digital skills. Sustainability, 12(17), 6807. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176807
  25. Sharmin, S., & Chowdhury, R. H. (2025). Digital transformation in governance: The impact of e-governance on public administration and transparency. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(1), 362-379. doi:https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2025.7.1.27
  26. Sigwejo, A., & Pather, S. (2016). A citizen?centric framework for assessing e?government effectiveness. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 74(1), 1-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2016.tb00542.x
  27. Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government–A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167-178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
  28. WorldBank. (2020). Digital government readiness assessment toolkit: guidelines for task teams. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10986/33674
  29. Young, M. M. (2020). Implementation of digital?era governance: the case of open data in US cities. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 305-315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13156
WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email