Strengthening environmental, social, and governance accountability in international financial institutions

https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v7i3.3579
Published: Dec 5, 2025

Abstract:

Purpose: This study examines how international financial institutions (IFIs) integrate accountability for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues into financial governance and decision-making. It assesses whether existing frameworks translate sustainability commitments into binding oversight or primarily function as legitimacy tools in global finance.

Methodology/Approach: A qualitative comparative analysis was conducted using policy frameworks, evaluation reports, audit findings, and peer-reviewed research from 2018–2025. Legitimacy theory and principal–agent dynamics guided interpretation, supported by a coding matrix reviewing rule design, monitoring scope, stakeholder engagement, and data verifiability.

Results/Findings: Findings show that sustainability standards are increasingly embedded in institutional mandates, but implementation remains uneven. Environmental integration is the most advanced, while social safeguards are limited by resourcing and political constraints. Governance accountability remains restricted by institutional mandates. Digital monitoring tools improve oversight but raise concerns about ethical design and unequal technical capacity.

Conclusions: ESG frameworks within IFIs provide strong normative commitments but lack binding enforcement. This creates a persistent gap between institutional ambition and operational practice. Stronger accountability requires harmonized metrics, independent verification, and participatory mechanisms capable of converting transparency into enforceable oversight.

Limitations: Limited access to internal deliberations and the lack of longitudinal community-level data constrain assessments of long-term effectiveness.

Contribution: The study links normative expectations behind ESG accountability with operational control mechanisms in IFIs. It proposes a reform agenda emphasizing mandatory disclosure, independent oversight bodies, and inclusive monitoring systems—framing ESG accountability as a shift from voluntary transparency to enforceable stewardship in global finance.

Keywords:
1. ESG Accountability
2. Global Governance
3. International Financial Institutions
4. Legitimacy Theory
5. Sustainable Finance
Authors:
1 . Elman Azizov
Independent Researcher, New York, United States
2 . Aytan Azizli
Hunter College, New York, United States
View PDF
How to Cite
Azizov, E., & Azizli, A. . (2025). Strengthening environmental, social, and governance accountability in international financial institutions. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 7(3), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v7i3.3579
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): December
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

    (IEG), I. E. G. (2022). Results and Performance of the World Bank Group 2022. Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/evaluations/results-and-performance-world-bank-group-2022

    (OIOS), O. o. I. O. S. (2023). Annual Reports. Retrieved from https://oios.un.org/annual-reports

    (TCFD), T. F. o. C.-R. F. D. (2023). Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. Retrieved from https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/

    Abouarab, R., Mishra, T., & Wolfe, S. (2025). Does the EU sustainable finance disclosure regulation mitigate greenwashing? The European Journal of Finance, 31(8), 957-989. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2025.2457944

    Auditors, E. C. o. (2022). Special Report 09/2022: Climate Spending in the 2014–2020 EU Budget – Not as High as Reported (09/2022). Retrieved from Luxembourg: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/SR22_09

    Bacher, K., DØskeland, M., Graça, R., Lavrutich, M., Pierce, M., & Pimentel, R. (2025). Greenwashing risk in asset pricing: the shift after the Paris agreement. Quantitative Finance, 1-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2025.2563091

    Bao, X., Sadiq, M., Tye, W., & Zhang, J. (2024). The impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rating disparities on corporate risk: The mediating role of financing constraints. Journal of Environmental Management, 371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123113

    Basali, M. (2025). Impact of Financial Performance and Corporate Governance on ESG Disclosure: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 17(18), 1-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188473

    Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2020). Advancing research into accounting and the UN sustainable development goals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(7), 1657-1670. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2020-4556

    Brabec, J., & Machá?, J. (2025). Impacts of the EU Taxonomy implementation: a systematic literature review. Climate Policy, 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2025.2526683

    Busch, D. (2023). EU sustainable finance disclosure regulation. Capital Markets Law Journal, 18(3), 303-328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmad005

    Cantero Saiz, M., Sanfilippo Azofra, S., Torre Olmo, M. B., & Bringas Fernandez, V. (2025). ESG and bank profitability: the moderating role of country sustainability in developing and developed economies. Green Finance, 7(2), 288-331. doi:https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2025011

    Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. Available at SSRN 2508281. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2508281

    Cochran, I., Mackenzie, C., & Brander, M. (2025). EU’s sustainable finance disclosure regulation: does the hybrid reporting regime undermine the goal to reorient capital to climate action? Climate Policy, 25(1), 76-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2353115

    Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Pagani, F., Banja, M., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., . . . Risquez Martin, A. (2023). GHG emissions of all world countries. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 10, 1-268. doi:https://doi.org/10.2760/953332

    Dellmuth, L., Tallberg, J., Agne, H., Bexell, M., Gregoratti, C., & Jonsson, K. (2022). Legitimacy in Global Governance. Retrieved from Stockholm: https://www.hhs.se/contentassets/ecbd2ee7244844609602054f7fd9b059/legitimacy-program-1.pdf

    Dingwerth, K., Witt, A., Lehmann, I., Reichel, E., & Weise, T. (2029). International Organizations under Pressure: Legitimating Global Governance in Challenging Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Ecker-Ehrhardt, M., Dellmuth, L., & Tallberg, J. (2024). Ideology and Legitimacy in Global Governance. International Organization, 78(4), 731-765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818324000304

    Fund, I. M. (2019). A Strategy for IMF Engagement on Social Spending (2019/016). Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2019/06/10/A-Strategy-for-IMF-Engagement-on-Social-Spending-46975

    Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., Naciti, V., & Paltrinieri, A. (2024). A PRISMA systematic review of greenwashing in the banking industry: A call for action. Research in International Business and Finance, 69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102262

    Germain, R. (2016). Susan Strange and the Future of Global Political Economy: Power, Control and Transformation. London: Routledge.

    Group, I. E. (2023). Independent Evaluation Group Validation of the Management Action Record 2023. World Bank Publications-Books.

    Group, W. B. (2023). Geo-Enabling Initiative for Monitoring and Supervision (GEMS). Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/fragilityconflictviolence/brief/geo-enabling-initiative-for-monitoring-and-supervision-gems

    Hamdouni, A. (2025). Value creation through environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(8), 1-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18080415

    Institute, S. R. (2024). New record of 142 natural catastrophes accumulates to USD 108 billion insured losses in 2023, finds Swiss Re Institute. Retrieved from https://www.swissre.com/press-release/New-record-of-142-natural-catastrophes-accumulates-to-USD-108-billion-insured-losses-in-2023-finds-Swiss-Re-Institute/a2512914-6d3a-492e-a190-aac37feca15b

    ISSB. (2022). ISSB Update July 2022. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/updates/issb/2022/issb-update-july-2022/

    Kentikelenis, A., & Stubbs, T. (2024). Social protection and the International Monetary Fund: promise versus performance. Globalization and health, 20(1), 41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-024-01045-9

    Li, Q., Tang, W., & Li, Z. (2024). ESG systems and financial performance in industries with significant environmental impact: a comprehensive analysis. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5, 1454822. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1454822

    Macdonald, K., Bahruddin, Hartoto, A. S., Unger, C., Cisneros, P., Pugley, D. D., . . . Kurniawan, N. I. (2024). The politics of accountability in global sustainable commodity governance: Dilemmas of institutional competition and convergence. Global Policy, 15(5), 838-854. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13426

    Mende, J. (2024). Substance-or legitimacy-oriented (de) legitimation of global governance institutions. The double-edged role of complexity. Globalizations, 21(7), 1233-1250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2330171

    Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & K?c?man, E. (2019). Social data: Biases, methodological pitfalls, and ethical boundaries. Frontiers in big data, 2, 13. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00013

    Schmidtke, H., Schirmer, S., Krösche, N., & Lenz, T. (2024). The legitimation of international organizations: Introducing a new dataset. International Studies Perspectives, 25(1), 86-110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekad008

    Syarkani, Y., Subu, M., & Waluyo, I. (2024). Impact of ESG performance on firm value: A comparison of emerging and developed markets. Commercium: Journal of Business and Management, 2(4), 204-219. doi:https://doi.org/10.61978/commercium.v2i4.367

    Vestrelli, R., Colladon, A. F., & Pisello, A. L. (2024). When attention to climate change matters: The impact of climate risk disclosure on firm market value. Energy Policy, 185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113938

    Zhong, W., & Jin, L. (2025). The Impact of Climate Risk Disclosure on Corporate Green Technology Innovation. Sustainability, 17(6), 2699. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062699

  1. (IEG), I. E. G. (2022). Results and Performance of the World Bank Group 2022. Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/evaluations/results-and-performance-world-bank-group-2022
  2. (OIOS), O. o. I. O. S. (2023). Annual Reports. Retrieved from https://oios.un.org/annual-reports
  3. (TCFD), T. F. o. C.-R. F. D. (2023). Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. Retrieved from https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/
  4. Abouarab, R., Mishra, T., & Wolfe, S. (2025). Does the EU sustainable finance disclosure regulation mitigate greenwashing? The European Journal of Finance, 31(8), 957-989. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2025.2457944
  5. Auditors, E. C. o. (2022). Special Report 09/2022: Climate Spending in the 2014–2020 EU Budget – Not as High as Reported (09/2022). Retrieved from Luxembourg: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/SR22_09
  6. Bacher, K., DØskeland, M., Graça, R., Lavrutich, M., Pierce, M., & Pimentel, R. (2025). Greenwashing risk in asset pricing: the shift after the Paris agreement. Quantitative Finance, 1-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2025.2563091
  7. Bao, X., Sadiq, M., Tye, W., & Zhang, J. (2024). The impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rating disparities on corporate risk: The mediating role of financing constraints. Journal of Environmental Management, 371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123113
  8. Basali, M. (2025). Impact of Financial Performance and Corporate Governance on ESG Disclosure: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 17(18), 1-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188473
  9. Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2020). Advancing research into accounting and the UN sustainable development goals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(7), 1657-1670. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2020-4556
  10. Brabec, J., & Machá?, J. (2025). Impacts of the EU Taxonomy implementation: a systematic literature review. Climate Policy, 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2025.2526683
  11. Busch, D. (2023). EU sustainable finance disclosure regulation. Capital Markets Law Journal, 18(3), 303-328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmad005
  12. Cantero Saiz, M., Sanfilippo Azofra, S., Torre Olmo, M. B., & Bringas Fernandez, V. (2025). ESG and bank profitability: the moderating role of country sustainability in developing and developed economies. Green Finance, 7(2), 288-331. doi:https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2025011
  13. Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. Available at SSRN 2508281. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2508281
  14. Cochran, I., Mackenzie, C., & Brander, M. (2025). EU’s sustainable finance disclosure regulation: does the hybrid reporting regime undermine the goal to reorient capital to climate action? Climate Policy, 25(1), 76-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2353115
  15. Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Pagani, F., Banja, M., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., . . . Risquez Martin, A. (2023). GHG emissions of all world countries. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 10, 1-268. doi:https://doi.org/10.2760/953332
  16. Dellmuth, L., Tallberg, J., Agne, H., Bexell, M., Gregoratti, C., & Jonsson, K. (2022). Legitimacy in Global Governance. Retrieved from Stockholm: https://www.hhs.se/contentassets/ecbd2ee7244844609602054f7fd9b059/legitimacy-program-1.pdf
  17. Dingwerth, K., Witt, A., Lehmann, I., Reichel, E., & Weise, T. (2029). International Organizations under Pressure: Legitimating Global Governance in Challenging Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Ecker-Ehrhardt, M., Dellmuth, L., & Tallberg, J. (2024). Ideology and Legitimacy in Global Governance. International Organization, 78(4), 731-765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818324000304
  19. Fund, I. M. (2019). A Strategy for IMF Engagement on Social Spending (2019/016). Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2019/06/10/A-Strategy-for-IMF-Engagement-on-Social-Spending-46975
  20. Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., Naciti, V., & Paltrinieri, A. (2024). A PRISMA systematic review of greenwashing in the banking industry: A call for action. Research in International Business and Finance, 69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102262
  21. Germain, R. (2016). Susan Strange and the Future of Global Political Economy: Power, Control and Transformation. London: Routledge.
  22. Group, I. E. (2023). Independent Evaluation Group Validation of the Management Action Record 2023. World Bank Publications-Books.
  23. Group, W. B. (2023). Geo-Enabling Initiative for Monitoring and Supervision (GEMS). Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/fragilityconflictviolence/brief/geo-enabling-initiative-for-monitoring-and-supervision-gems
  24. Hamdouni, A. (2025). Value creation through environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(8), 1-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18080415
  25. Institute, S. R. (2024). New record of 142 natural catastrophes accumulates to USD 108 billion insured losses in 2023, finds Swiss Re Institute. Retrieved from https://www.swissre.com/press-release/New-record-of-142-natural-catastrophes-accumulates-to-USD-108-billion-insured-losses-in-2023-finds-Swiss-Re-Institute/a2512914-6d3a-492e-a190-aac37feca15b
  26. ISSB. (2022). ISSB Update July 2022. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/updates/issb/2022/issb-update-july-2022/
  27. Kentikelenis, A., & Stubbs, T. (2024). Social protection and the International Monetary Fund: promise versus performance. Globalization and health, 20(1), 41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-024-01045-9
  28. Li, Q., Tang, W., & Li, Z. (2024). ESG systems and financial performance in industries with significant environmental impact: a comprehensive analysis. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5, 1454822. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1454822
  29. Macdonald, K., Bahruddin, Hartoto, A. S., Unger, C., Cisneros, P., Pugley, D. D., . . . Kurniawan, N. I. (2024). The politics of accountability in global sustainable commodity governance: Dilemmas of institutional competition and convergence. Global Policy, 15(5), 838-854. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13426
  30. Mende, J. (2024). Substance-or legitimacy-oriented (de) legitimation of global governance institutions. The double-edged role of complexity. Globalizations, 21(7), 1233-1250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2330171
  31. Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & K?c?man, E. (2019). Social data: Biases, methodological pitfalls, and ethical boundaries. Frontiers in big data, 2, 13. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00013
  32. Schmidtke, H., Schirmer, S., Krösche, N., & Lenz, T. (2024). The legitimation of international organizations: Introducing a new dataset. International Studies Perspectives, 25(1), 86-110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekad008
  33. Syarkani, Y., Subu, M., & Waluyo, I. (2024). Impact of ESG performance on firm value: A comparison of emerging and developed markets. Commercium: Journal of Business and Management, 2(4), 204-219. doi:https://doi.org/10.61978/commercium.v2i4.367
  34. Vestrelli, R., Colladon, A. F., & Pisello, A. L. (2024). When attention to climate change matters: The impact of climate risk disclosure on firm market value. Energy Policy, 185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113938
  35. Zhong, W., & Jin, L. (2025). The Impact of Climate Risk Disclosure on Corporate Green Technology Innovation. Sustainability, 17(6), 2699. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062699