Enhancing online learning with Wakelet: A technology acceptance framework analysis

https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v3i4.1473
Published: Aug 29, 2023

Abstract:

Purpose: This study aims to examine students’ perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioral intentions, and attitudes toward the use of Wakelet as an interactive digital platform for teaching and learning (T&L) in Front Office modules.

Research methodology: The sample of respondents was composed of twenty-four Front Office students enrolled in the Hotel Operation program, and the research instrument was a questionnaire based on the Technological Acceptance Model.

Results: The findings indicate that the majority of respondents accept the use of Wakelet as an interactive digital platform for T&L in Front Office modules, and Wakelet is also easy to use. Additionally, respondents' attitudes were positive toward the use of Wakelet, and students' behavioral intentions towards the use of Wakelet were also at a high level.

Limitations: However, this study has limitations, such as focusing only on students' perceptions and attitudes towards Wakelet as a digital platform for T&L in the Front Office module.

Contribution: This research adds to the body of knowledge by providing insights into students' perceptions of Wakelet as a new interactive digital platform for T&L in the Front Office module. It highlights the positive attitudes and perceived usefulness of Wakelet among students, indicating that Wakelet has the potential to enhance the quality of online learning experiences.

Novelty: The novelty of this study lies in its examination of the perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions of students towards Wakelet as a new digital platform for teaching and learning. This study provides evidence that Wakelet can be an effective tool for enhancing the learning experience and improving student performance.

Keywords:
1. Wakelet
2. Perceived Usefulness
3. Perceived Ease of Use
4. Attitude
5. Behavioral Intention
Authors:
Wei Boon Quah
Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia
View PDF
How to Cite
Quah, W. B. (2023). Enhancing online learning with Wakelet: A technology acceptance framework analysis. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 3(4), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v3i4.1473
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): August
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  2. Al-Rahmi, W., Aldraiweesh, A., Yahaya, N., & Kamin, Y. B. (2018). Massive open online courses (MOOCS): Systematic literature review in Malaysian higher education. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 2197-2202.
  3. Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Alamri, M. M., Alyoussef, I. Y., Al-Rahmi, A. M., & Kamin, Y. B. (2021). Integrating innovation diffusion theory with technology acceptance model: Supporting students’ attitude towards using a massive open online courses (MOOCs) systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(8), 1380-1392.
  4. Alalwan, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alfarraj, O., Alzahrani, A., Yahaya, N., & Al-Rahmi, A. M. (2019). Integrated three theories to develop a model of factors affecting students’ academic performance in higher education. IEEE Access, 7, 98725-98742.
  5. Alamri, M. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, A. M., Abualrejal, H., Zeki, A. M., & Al-Maatouk, Q. (2019). Towards adaptive e-learning among university students: By applying technology acceptance model (TAM). e-learning, 7(10).
  6. Alamri, M. M., Almaiah, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2020). Social media applications affecting Students’ academic performance: A model developed for sustainability in higher education. Sustainability, 12(16), 6471.
  7. Alim, N., Linda, W., Gunawan, F., & Saad, M. S. M. (2019). The effectiveness of Google classroom as an instructional media: A case of state islamic institute of Kendari, Indonesia. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 240-246.
  8. Alshehri, A., Rutter, M. J., & Smith, S. (2019). An implementation of the UTAUT model for understanding students' perceptions of learning management systems: A study within tertiary institutions in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 17(3), 1-24.
  9. Ashraf, M. A., Khan, M. N., Chohan, S. R., Khan, M., Rafique, W., Farid, M. F., & Khan, A. U. (2021). Social Media Improves Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Role of Social Media Adoption in the Open Learning Environment among International Medical Students in China. Paper presented at the Healthcare.
  10. Caratiquit, K., & Pablo, R. (2021). Exploring the practices of secondary school teachers in preparing for classroom observation amidst the new normal of education. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education.
  11. Cesare, D. M. D., Kaczorowski, T., & Hashey, A. (2021). A Piece of the (Ed) Puzzle: Using the Edpuzzle interactive video platform to facilitate explicit instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(2), 77-83.
  12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
  13. Delacruz, S. (2013). Online reading response using Edmodo. The Florida Reading Journal, 49(2), 9-12.
  14. Dizon, G. (2016). Quizlet in the EFL classroom: Enhancing academic vocabulary acquisition of Japanese university students. Teaching English with Technology, 16(2), 40-56.
  15. Douglas, A., & Miller, B. (2006). Experiential learning: Empowering students in an interactive online hospitality simulation environment. Paper presented at the 11th annual hospitality and tourism graduate student education and research conference.
  16. Esteban-Millat, I., Martínez-López, F. J., Pujol-Jover, M., Gázquez-Abad, J. C., & Alegret, A. (2018). An extension of the technology acceptance model for online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(7), 895-910.
  17. Fabunmi, M., Brai-Abu, P., & Adeniji, I. A. (2007). Class factors as determinants of secondary school student’s academic performance in Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences, 14(3), 243-247.
  18. Giyanto, G., Heliawaty, L., & Rubini, B. (2020). The effectiveness of online learning by EdPuzzle in polymer materials on students’ problem-solving skills. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering, 959(1), 012-006.
  19. Graham, K. (2018). TechMatters: Doing Digital Curation with Wakelet. LOEX Quarterly, 45(2), 3.
  20. Gunawan, G., Purwoko, A. A., Ramdani, A., & Yustiqvar, M. (2021). Pembelajaran menggunakan learning management systemberbasis moodle pada masa pandemi covid-19. Indonesian Journal of Teacher Education, 2(1), 226-235.
  21. Henderson, D., Woodcock, H., Mehta, J., Khan, N., Shivji, V., Richardson, C., . . . Burns, A. (2020). Keep calm and carry on learning: using Microsoft teams to deliver a medical education programme during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future healthcare journal, 7(3), e67.
  22. Hossain, M. A., & Yasmin, F. (2022). Emergency Online Teaching-Learning Model in the Context of Higher-Level Education due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2(4), 327-341.
  23. Hussein, Z. (2017). Leading to intention: The role of attitude in relation to technology acceptance model in e-learning. Procedia computer science, 105, 159-164.
  24. Ilag, B. N., & Sabale, A. M. (2022). Microsoft teams overview Troubleshooting Microsoft Teams: Enlisting the Right Approach and Tools in Teams for Mapping and Troubleshooting Issues (pp. 17-74): Springer.
  25. Khan, M. R., & Hossain, S. S. (2021). Perception of distance learning in Bangladeshi tertiary education: prospects and obstacles in the Covid-19 era. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 1(3), 197-207.
  26. Khaneghahi, S., Nasripour, F., & MahmoudZehi, M. A. (2022). Investigating the relationship between e-learning and mobile learning on students' academic self-handicapping during the outbreak of COVID-19. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2(3), 269-281.
  27. Kongchan, C. (2008). How a non-digital-native teacher makes use of Edmodo. Paper presented at the 5th Intenational Conference ICT for language learning.
  28. Kongchan, C. (2013). How Edmodo and Google Docs can change traditional classrooms. Paper presented at the The European Conference on Language Learning.
  29. Luk, C.-H., Ng, K.-K., & Lam, W.-M. (2018). The acceptance of using open-source learning platform (Moodle) for learning in Hong Kong’s higher education. Paper presented at the Technology in Education. Innovative Solutions and Practices: Third International Conference, ICTE 2018, Hong Kong, China, January 9-11, 2018, Revised Selected Papers 3.
  30. Maheshwari, G. (2021). Factors affecting students’ intentions to undertake online learning: an empirical study in Vietnam. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6629-6649.
  31. Martin, L., & Tapp, D. (2019). Teaching with Teams: An introduction to teaching an undergraduate law module using Microsoft Teams. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 3(3).
  32. Mischel, L. J. (2019). Watch and learn? Using EDpuzzle to enhance the use of online videos. Management Teaching Review, 4(3), 283-289.
  33. Nasir, K. B., & Neger, M. (2022). Students’ attitude towards online education system: A comparative study between Public and Private Universities in Bangladesh. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2(2), 167-183.
  34. Orcos Palma, L., Blázquez Tobías, P. J., Curto Prieto, M., Molina León, F. J., & Magreñán Ruiz, Á. A. (2018). Use of kahoot and EdPuzzle by smartphone in the classroom: the design of a methodological proposal. Paper presented at the Learning Technology for Education Challenges: 7th International Workshop, LTEC 2018, Žilina, Slovakia, August 6–10, 2018, Proceedings 7.
  35. Pal, D., & Vanijja, V. (2020). Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India. Children and youth services review, 119, 105535.
  36. Puspitaloka, N., Rachmawati, I., & Sonjaya, D. O. (2018). Edmodo as Educational Social Network in Teaching Course Design of EYL. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Learning, 3(2), 146-162.
  37. Riaz, A., Riaz, A., & Hussain, M. (2011). Students’ acceptance and commitment to e-learning: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 1(5), 21-30.
  38. Rojabi, A. R. (2020). Exploring EFL Students' Perception of Online Learning via Microsoft Teams: University Level in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 163-173.
  39. Salloum, S. A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Factors affecting students’ acceptance of e-learning system in higher education using UTAUT and structural equation modeling approaches. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2018 4.
  40. Shao, C. (2020). An empirical study on the identification of driving factors of satisfaction with online learning based on TAM. Paper presented at the 5th international conference on economics, management, law and education (EMLE 2019).
  41. Stroud, C. (2010). Edmodo: A white paper. Connecting Technology & Curriculum.
  42. Sukmawati, S., & Nensia, N. (2019). The role of Google Classroom in ELT. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(2), 142-145.
  43. Tan, P. J. B. (2019). An empirical study of how the learning attitudes of college students toward English e-tutoring websites affect site sustainability. Sustainability, 11(6), 1748.
  44. Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26, 124-142.
  45. Thongmak, M. (2013). Social network system in classroom: antecedents of Edmodo© adoption. Journal of E-learning and Higher Education, 2013(1), 1-15.
  46. Tu, N. P., & Luong, T. K. P. (2021). Online language learning via Moodle and Microsoft Teams: students’ challenges and suggestions for improvement. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference.
  47. Umbit, A. F., & Taat, M. S. (2016). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan e-pembelajaran dalam kalangan pelajar di institut. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPGK BL, 13, 1-14.
  48. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
  49. Ventayen, R. J. M., Estira, K. L. A., De Guzman, M. J., Cabaluna, C. M., & Espinosa, N. N. (2018). Usability evaluation of google classroom: Basis for the adaptation of gsuite e-learning platform. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 5(1), 47-51.