Implications of Indonesia's joining the BRICS on national defense and security strategy

https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v5i3.2903
Published: Jun 17, 2025

Abstract:

Purpose: This study analyzes the strategic implications of Indonesia’s membership in BRICS on national defense and security, focusing on its potential to strengthen military cooperation, diversify defense procurement, and enhance geopolitical positioning while navigating complex global alignments.

Research methodology: This study employs a qualitative method using a literature review and secondary data analysis. These sources include policy documents from the Indonesian government, international reports, and academic publications related to BRICS, defense diplomacy, and global security dynamics. Descriptive and comparative analysis techniques were used to explore the strategic implications and potential shifts in Indonesia's foreign policy.

Results: The study finds that BRICS membership offers Indonesia enhanced access to alternative funding via the New Development Bank, broader defense cooperation, and opportunities to modernize military capabilities through technology transfer. It also provides a platform for more assertive defense diplomacy. However, risks include potential diplomatic friction with Western allies, internal power asymmetries within BRICS countries, and challenges to Indonesia’s non-aligned foreign policy stance.

Conclusions: Indonesia’s BRICS membership can bolster national defense and strategic autonomy if managed with diplomatic prudence. A balanced foreign policy is essential to leverage the advantages of BRICS while preserving partnerships with Western powers and ASEAN allies. Investment in cybersecurity, military modernization, and defense diplomacy is crucial for long-term stability.

Limitations: This study relies solely on secondary data, limiting insights into internal policy dynamics and practical implementation.

Contribution: It offers a strategic perspective on Indonesia’s BRICS engagement and its implications for defense diplomacy and national security.

Keywords:
1. BRICS
2. Defense Diplomacy
3. Geopolitics Global
4. Military Cooperation
5. Economic Resilience
Authors:
1 . Edy Triharyono
Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia
2 . Yenglis Dongche Damanik
Universitas Pertahanan, Indonesia
3 . Ghazalie Ghazalie
Universitas Pertahanan, Indonesia
View PDF
How to Cite
Triharyono, E., Damanik, Y. D. ., & Ghazalie, G. (2025). Implications of Indonesia’s joining the BRICS on national defense and security strategy. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 5(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v5i3.2903
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): May
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

    Arbitration, P. C. o. (2016). The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People's Republic of China). Retrieved from https://pca--cpa-org.translate.goog/cn/cases/7/?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc

    Auma, Z., Obici, G., & Mwesigwa, D. (2022). Community Support Groups and Home-Based Care among Persons Living with HIV and AIDS in Lira District, Uganda. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(2), 69-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i2.1465

    Australian, T. (2025). Concern in the West as Indonesia joins BRICS bloc as full member. Retrieved from https://www.theaustralian.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=TAWEB_WRE170_a_GGL&dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fworld%2Fconcern-in-the-west-as-indonesia-joins-brics-bloc-as-full-member%2Fnews-story%2Fd1d06ded0377855795a140758bd8ecd5&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium&v21=GROUPA-Segment-1-NOSCORE&V21spcbehaviour=append

    Balfour, R., Baroncelli, E., Bomassi, L., Csernatoni, R., Goldthau, A., Grevi, G., . . . Youngs, R. (2024). Geopolitics and Economic Statecraft in the European Union: Carnegie Europe.

    Blackwill, R. D., & Harris, J. M. (2016). War by other means: Geoeconomics and statecraft: Harvard University Press.

    chathamhouse.org. (2018). Chatham House Expert Perspectives 2018: Risks and Opportunities in International Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.chathamhouse.org/2018/06/chatham-house-expert-perspectives-2018/geopolitics-and-security

    Chen, X., & Zhang, S. (2025). BRICS and Global Governance: An Analysis from the Perspective of International Political Economy. Journal of Fintech and Business Analysis, 2(1).

    Cottey, A. (2013). Reshaping defence diplomacy: New roles for military cooperation and assistance: Routledge.

    Hastjarjo, K. (2023). Model Pemasaran Strategik Perhotelan: Sebuah Makalah Konseptual. Jurnal Studi Perhotelan dan Pariwisata, 1(1), 11-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jspp.v1i1.1844

    Keohane, R. O., & Nye Jr, J. S. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival, 15(4), 158-165.

    Kissinger, H. (2014). Diplomacy Geopolitics (pp. 114-115): Routledge.

    Manalu, H. P., Shafira, M., Fardiansyah, A. I., Firganefi, F., & Cemerlang, A. M. (2022). Non-Penal efforts in countermeasures online prostitution crimes. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(2), 85-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i2.1602

    Natamiharja, R., Panjaitan, O. D. A., & Setiawan, I. (2025). Arbitrase Internasional: Evaluasi Efektivitasnya sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 4(2), 83-89. doi:http://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v4i2.3297

    Pebrianto, R. (2023). Reformulasi Sanksi Pidana bagi Pelaku Eutanasia dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan, 1(2), 87-94. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v1i2.1925

    Pessoa, G. S. (2025). Indonesia is admitted to the BRICS bloc of developing nations. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/brazil-brics-indonesia-membership-c05b0c8e2ae493f9046479e62a45d8fa

    Ramadhani. D, A. N., Shafira, M., Dewi, E., Jatmiko, G., & Warganegara, D. (2024). Implementasi Perluasan Makna Asas Legalitas Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 3(2), 65-74. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v3i2.2529

    Reis, J., Cohen, Y., Melão, N., Costa, J., & Jorge, D. (2021). High-Tech Defense Industries: Developing Autonomous Intelligent Systems. Applied Sciences, 11(11). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114920

    Riza, K. (2023). Hak Restitusi bagi Korban Perdagangan Orang: Sebuah Langkah Penting Menuju Keadilan di Indonesia. Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan, 2(1), 37-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v2i1.2359

    Roberts, J. (2020). Political ecology The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology: Columbia University.

    Seran, H., Nursalam, N., & Tamunu, L. M. (2022). The effect of society participation, budget, and organization on the effectiveness of pond maintenance program in Kobalima District, Malaka Regency. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 1(2), 79-96. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v1i2.1078

    Seran, H. V., Pandie, D. B., & Sayrani, L. P. (2022). The Neutrality Dilemma of Civil Servant in 2020 Local Leaders Election on Malaka Regency. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 1(2), 109-123. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v1i2.1487

    Thayer, C. (2013). ASEAN, China and the Code of Conduct in the South China Sea. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 33, 75-84. doi:10.1353/sais.2013.0022

    Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics: McGraw-Hill.

  1. Arbitration, P. C. o. (2016). The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People's Republic of China). Retrieved from https://pca--cpa-org.translate.goog/cn/cases/7/?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc
  2. Auma, Z., Obici, G., & Mwesigwa, D. (2022). Community Support Groups and Home-Based Care among Persons Living with HIV and AIDS in Lira District, Uganda. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(2), 69-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i2.1465
  3. Australian, T. (2025). Concern in the West as Indonesia joins BRICS bloc as full member. Retrieved from https://www.theaustralian.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=TAWEB_WRE170_a_GGL&dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fworld%2Fconcern-in-the-west-as-indonesia-joins-brics-bloc-as-full-member%2Fnews-story%2Fd1d06ded0377855795a140758bd8ecd5&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium&v21=GROUPA-Segment-1-NOSCORE&V21spcbehaviour=append
  4. Balfour, R., Baroncelli, E., Bomassi, L., Csernatoni, R., Goldthau, A., Grevi, G., . . . Youngs, R. (2024). Geopolitics and Economic Statecraft in the European Union: Carnegie Europe.
  5. Blackwill, R. D., & Harris, J. M. (2016). War by other means: Geoeconomics and statecraft: Harvard University Press.
  6. chathamhouse.org. (2018). Chatham House Expert Perspectives 2018: Risks and Opportunities in International Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.chathamhouse.org/2018/06/chatham-house-expert-perspectives-2018/geopolitics-and-security
  7. Chen, X., & Zhang, S. (2025). BRICS and Global Governance: An Analysis from the Perspective of International Political Economy. Journal of Fintech and Business Analysis, 2(1).
  8. Cottey, A. (2013). Reshaping defence diplomacy: New roles for military cooperation and assistance: Routledge.
  9. Hastjarjo, K. (2023). Model Pemasaran Strategik Perhotelan: Sebuah Makalah Konseptual. Jurnal Studi Perhotelan dan Pariwisata, 1(1), 11-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jspp.v1i1.1844
  10. Keohane, R. O., & Nye Jr, J. S. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival, 15(4), 158-165.
  11. Kissinger, H. (2014). Diplomacy Geopolitics (pp. 114-115): Routledge.
  12. Manalu, H. P., Shafira, M., Fardiansyah, A. I., Firganefi, F., & Cemerlang, A. M. (2022). Non-Penal efforts in countermeasures online prostitution crimes. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(2), 85-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i2.1602
  13. Natamiharja, R., Panjaitan, O. D. A., & Setiawan, I. (2025). Arbitrase Internasional: Evaluasi Efektivitasnya sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 4(2), 83-89. doi:http://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v4i2.3297
  14. Pebrianto, R. (2023). Reformulasi Sanksi Pidana bagi Pelaku Eutanasia dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan, 1(2), 87-94. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v1i2.1925
  15. Pessoa, G. S. (2025). Indonesia is admitted to the BRICS bloc of developing nations. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/brazil-brics-indonesia-membership-c05b0c8e2ae493f9046479e62a45d8fa
  16. Ramadhani. D, A. N., Shafira, M., Dewi, E., Jatmiko, G., & Warganegara, D. (2024). Implementasi Perluasan Makna Asas Legalitas Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 3(2), 65-74. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v3i2.2529
  17. Reis, J., Cohen, Y., Melão, N., Costa, J., & Jorge, D. (2021). High-Tech Defense Industries: Developing Autonomous Intelligent Systems. Applied Sciences, 11(11). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114920
  18. Riza, K. (2023). Hak Restitusi bagi Korban Perdagangan Orang: Sebuah Langkah Penting Menuju Keadilan di Indonesia. Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan, 2(1), 37-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v2i1.2359
  19. Roberts, J. (2020). Political ecology The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology: Columbia University.
  20. Seran, H., Nursalam, N., & Tamunu, L. M. (2022). The effect of society participation, budget, and organization on the effectiveness of pond maintenance program in Kobalima District, Malaka Regency. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 1(2), 79-96. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v1i2.1078
  21. Seran, H. V., Pandie, D. B., & Sayrani, L. P. (2022). The Neutrality Dilemma of Civil Servant in 2020 Local Leaders Election on Malaka Regency. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 1(2), 109-123. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v1i2.1487
  22. Thayer, C. (2013). ASEAN, China and the Code of Conduct in the South China Sea. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 33, 75-84. doi:10.1353/sais.2013.0022
  23. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics: McGraw-Hill.