Interaction analysis on social-education of Indonesian school students: A literacy activity

https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v1i4.527
Published: Aug 6, 2021

Abstract:

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the socio-educational interactions between teachers and students. This article also looks at a literacy activity utilized by the teachers and students and their interaction patterns.

Research methodology: This research applied a naturalistic approach and descriptive qualitative research design. The data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. The data then were analyzed descriptively using the Miles and Huberman analysis model, namely data condensation, data presentation, and concluding.

Results: The research results show that to improve student literacy, there were two patterns of interaction: first, a one-way interaction pattern centered on the teacher as a facilitator, corrector, evaluator in literacy activities: second, a multi-directional interaction pattern occurred. Literacy activities aim to train the learners’ ability in reading, understanding and commenting. During the core activities, several aspects of the interactions occur between teachers and students, such as conveying information, explaining, motivating, and proposing to students. At the closing stage of literacy, several aspects of the interaction between teachers and students occur. Making summaries and reading about the literacy activities have provided directions for further literacy activities and conducting evaluations that have been carried out.

Limitations: There are limitations to the researcher, so this research is limited to one school only with the object of research on all students and teachers assigned to literacy activities at SMA Negeri 1 Latambaga.

Contribution: The study is expected to assist the schools in monitoring the literacy activities and developing student literacy, whereas, for students, this study is expected to improve their literacy and broaden their insights about technological and scientific developments.

Keywords:
1. Social-education interaction
2. Teachers and students
3. School literacy
Authors:
1 . Rahmad Rafid
Master of Educational Policy and Development, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia
2 . Farizal Khusnul Khotimah
English Department, Islamic institute of Pangeran Diponegoro Nganjuk, Nganjuk, Indonesia
View PDF
How to Cite
Rafid, R., & Khotimah, F. K. (2021). Interaction analysis on social-education of Indonesian school students: A literacy activity. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 1(4), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v1i4.527
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 1 No. 4 (2021): August
Articles
References

    Al-mutmainnah, W., Pantiwati, Y., Purwanti, E., Studi, P., Biologi, P., Malang, F. M., Raya, J., No, T., & Gls, A. P. (2017). Analisis Penerapan Gls ( Gerakan Literasi Sekolah ) Di Smp Negeri 1 Batu. Prosiding Seminar Nasional III, 180–192.

    Alter, S. (2018). System Interaction Patterns. IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, August 2016, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2016.11

    Anhar, H. (2013). Interaksi Edukatif Menurut Pemikiran Al-Ghazali. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 13(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v13i1.570

    Antasari, I. W. (2017). Implementasi Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Tahap Pembiasaan di MI Muhammadiyah Gandatapa Sumbang Banyumas. Jurnal LIBRIA, 9(1), 13–26.

    Antoro, B. (2017). Gerakan Literasi Sekolah: Dari Pucuk Hingga Akar.

    CK, D. H. (2016). The Implementation of School Literacy Movement in Secondary School. The 4th International Conference On Language, Literature, Culture, And Education, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-17.2018.12

    Fahri, L. M., & Qusyairi, L. A. H. (2019). Interaksi Sosial dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Palapa, 7(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.36088/palapa.v7i1.194

    Fahyuni, E. fariyatul, & Istikomah. (2016). Psikologi Belajar dan Mengajar : Kunci Sukses Guru dan Peserta didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif (I). Nizamia Learning Center. http://eprints.umsida.ac.id/738/2/PSIKOLOGI BLJR-NEW BOOK.pdf

    Harsiati, T. (2018). Karakteristik Soal Literasi Membaca Pada Program Pisa. Litera, 17(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v17i1.19048

    Hastuti, S., & Lestari, N. A. (2018). Gerakan Literasi Sekolah: Implementasi Tahap Pembiasaan Dan Pengembangan Literasi Di Sd Sukorejo Kediri. Jurnal Basataka (JBT), 1(2), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.36277/basataka.v1i2.34

    Herin, G. (2016). Pola Interaksi Satu Arah Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Di Kelas Xi Ips Sma Negeri 6 Makassar. jurnal sosialisasi pendidikan sosiologi-FIS UNM, 3(2), 136–142. http://ojs.unm.ac.id/sosialisasi/article/view/2376

    Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). Jurnal Golden Age, 4(01), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.29408/jga.v4i01.2018

    Hurst, B., Wallace, R., & Nixon, S. B. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons, 52(4), 375–398.

    Kemendikbud. (2016). Pedoman Pelaksanaan Gerakan Nasional Literasi Bangsa (Mari Menjadi Bangsa Pembaca).

    Kemendikbud, S. G. L. S. (2019). Buku Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Dasar (2 ed.). Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/11213

    Kristiyaningrum, R. K., & Ismanto, B. (2020). The Evaluation of School Literacy Movement Program in Secondary School. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 53(3), 266. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v53i1.24624

    Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook (3 ed.). SAGE Publications.Inc. http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf

    Nasution, A., Rothomi, A., Rahmania, I., Anggraini, P. R., Adawiyah, R., Wulandari, R. T., Rafid, R., & Mukadar, S. (2019). Sosiologi Pendidikan :Profesionalisme Pendidikan di Sekolah (M.Syahri (ed.); I). CV. Ismaya Berkah Group. academia.edu/42152451/SOSIOLOGI_PENDIDIKAN_Profesionalisme_Guru

    Oktaviani, W., & Sopiah. (2020). The Effect of School Literation Movement on Students’ Reading Interest Through Learning Sources. KnE Social Sciences, 2020, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i7.6846

    Praptanti, I., & Ernawati, A. (2019). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Di Sekolah Dasar Negeri. Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat IV Tahun 2019 Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.17977/um025v4i12019p045

    Prasetyarini, A. (2017). Implementasi Gerakan Literasi Sekolah pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Politik Dan Kewarganegaraan, 396(2), 94–104.

    Rizawati, Sulaiman, A. S. (2017). Hubungan antara Interaksi Edukatif Guru dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VI SD Negeri 18 Banda Aceh. Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2(1), 113–112.

    Sari, I. F. R. (2018). Konsep Dasar Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Pada Permendikbud Nomor 23 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penumbuhan Budi Pekerti. Al-Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 10(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-bidayah.v10i1.131

    Shidiq, U., & Choiri, M. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan. In A. Mujahidin (Ed.), Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9). CV. Nata Kerya. http://repository.iainponorogo.ac.id/484/1/METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF DI BIDANG PENDIDIKAN.pdf

    Silvia, O. W., & Djuanda, D. (2017). Model Literature Based Dalam Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah. Model Literature Based Dalam Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah, 4(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.23819/mimbar-sd.v4i2.7799

    Subakir, A. (2017). Concept Of Educational Interaction In Education : In Sociological Perspective. DIdaktika Religia, 5(2), 381–400.

    Sulaiman. (2019). Menjadi Guru PAI Yang Dirindukan Peserta Didik dalam Kelas. SEMINAR PROCEEDINGS 1st Annual International Seminar on Education, 93–99.

    Suriyanti, Y., & Beding, V. O. (2019). ANALISIS POLA INTERAKSI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN EKONOMI DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS KECAMATAN SINTANG KALIMANTAN BARAT. Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.26740/jepk.v6n1.p187-196

    Suswandari, M. (2018). Membangun Budaya Literasi Bagi Suplemen Pendidikan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Dikdas Bantara, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.32585/jdb.v1i1.105

    Suzanti, T. (2016). INTERAKSI EDUKATIF DALAM PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR SOSIOLOGI DI SMA NEGERI 1 BUNGORO KABUPATEN PANGKEP. jurnal sosialisasi pendidikan sosiologi-FIS UNM, 3(2), 1–5. http://ojs.unm.ac.id/sosialisasi/article/view/2376

    Tohir, M. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun Dibanding Tahun 2015. December 2019, 10–12. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/pcjvx

    Wandasari, Y. (2017). Implementasi gerakan literasi sekolah (gls) sebagai pembentuk pendidikan berkarakter. JMKSP: Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 1(1), 325–343.

  1. Al-mutmainnah, W., Pantiwati, Y., Purwanti, E., Studi, P., Biologi, P., Malang, F. M., Raya, J., No, T., & Gls, A. P. (2017). Analisis Penerapan Gls ( Gerakan Literasi Sekolah ) Di Smp Negeri 1 Batu. Prosiding Seminar Nasional III, 180–192.
  2. Alter, S. (2018). System Interaction Patterns. IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, August 2016, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2016.11
  3. Anhar, H. (2013). Interaksi Edukatif Menurut Pemikiran Al-Ghazali. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 13(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v13i1.570
  4. Antasari, I. W. (2017). Implementasi Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Tahap Pembiasaan di MI Muhammadiyah Gandatapa Sumbang Banyumas. Jurnal LIBRIA, 9(1), 13–26.
  5. Antoro, B. (2017). Gerakan Literasi Sekolah: Dari Pucuk Hingga Akar.
  6. CK, D. H. (2016). The Implementation of School Literacy Movement in Secondary School. The 4th International Conference On Language, Literature, Culture, And Education, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-17.2018.12
  7. Fahri, L. M., & Qusyairi, L. A. H. (2019). Interaksi Sosial dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Palapa, 7(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.36088/palapa.v7i1.194
  8. Fahyuni, E. fariyatul, & Istikomah. (2016). Psikologi Belajar dan Mengajar?: Kunci Sukses Guru dan Peserta didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif (I). Nizamia Learning Center. http://eprints.umsida.ac.id/738/2/PSIKOLOGI BLJR-NEW BOOK.pdf
  9. Harsiati, T. (2018). Karakteristik Soal Literasi Membaca Pada Program Pisa. Litera, 17(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v17i1.19048
  10. Hastuti, S., & Lestari, N. A. (2018). Gerakan Literasi Sekolah: Implementasi Tahap Pembiasaan Dan Pengembangan Literasi Di Sd Sukorejo Kediri. Jurnal Basataka (JBT), 1(2), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.36277/basataka.v1i2.34
  11. Herin, G. (2016). Pola Interaksi Satu Arah Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Di Kelas Xi Ips Sma Negeri 6 Makassar. jurnal sosialisasi pendidikan sosiologi-FIS UNM, 3(2), 136–142. http://ojs.unm.ac.id/sosialisasi/article/view/2376
  12. Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). Jurnal Golden Age, 4(01), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.29408/jga.v4i01.2018
  13. Hurst, B., Wallace, R., & Nixon, S. B. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons, 52(4), 375–398.
  14. Kemendikbud. (2016). Pedoman Pelaksanaan Gerakan Nasional Literasi Bangsa (Mari Menjadi Bangsa Pembaca).
  15. Kemendikbud, S. G. L. S. (2019). Buku Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Dasar (2 ed.). Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/11213
  16. Kristiyaningrum, R. K., & Ismanto, B. (2020). The Evaluation of School Literacy Movement Program in Secondary School. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 53(3), 266. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v53i1.24624
  17. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook (3 ed.). SAGE Publications.Inc. http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf
  18. Nasution, A., Rothomi, A., Rahmania, I., Anggraini, P. R., Adawiyah, R., Wulandari, R. T., Rafid, R., & Mukadar, S. (2019). Sosiologi Pendidikan?:Profesionalisme Pendidikan di Sekolah (M.Syahri (ed.); I). CV. Ismaya Berkah Group. academia.edu/42152451/SOSIOLOGI_PENDIDIKAN_Profesionalisme_Guru
  19. Oktaviani, W., & Sopiah. (2020). The Effect of School Literation Movement on Students’ Reading Interest Through Learning Sources. KnE Social Sciences, 2020, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i7.6846
  20. Praptanti, I., & Ernawati, A. (2019). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Di Sekolah Dasar Negeri. Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat IV Tahun 2019 Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.17977/um025v4i12019p045
  21. Prasetyarini, A. (2017). Implementasi Gerakan Literasi Sekolah pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Politik Dan Kewarganegaraan, 396(2), 94–104.
  22. Rizawati, Sulaiman, A. S. (2017). Hubungan antara Interaksi Edukatif Guru dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VI SD Negeri 18 Banda Aceh. Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2(1), 113–112.
  23. Sari, I. F. R. (2018). Konsep Dasar Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Pada Permendikbud Nomor 23 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penumbuhan Budi Pekerti. Al-Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 10(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-bidayah.v10i1.131
  24. Shidiq, U., & Choiri, M. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan. In A. Mujahidin (Ed.), Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9). CV. Nata Kerya. http://repository.iainponorogo.ac.id/484/1/METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF DI BIDANG PENDIDIKAN.pdf
  25. Silvia, O. W., & Djuanda, D. (2017). Model Literature Based Dalam Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah. Model Literature Based Dalam Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah, 4(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.23819/mimbar-sd.v4i2.7799
  26. Subakir, A. (2017). Concept Of Educational Interaction In Education?: In Sociological Perspective. DIdaktika Religia, 5(2), 381–400.
  27. Sulaiman. (2019). Menjadi Guru PAI Yang Dirindukan Peserta Didik dalam Kelas. SEMINAR PROCEEDINGS 1st Annual International Seminar on Education, 93–99.
  28. Suriyanti, Y., & Beding, V. O. (2019). ANALISIS POLA INTERAKSI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN EKONOMI DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS KECAMATAN SINTANG KALIMANTAN BARAT. Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.26740/jepk.v6n1.p187-196
  29. Suswandari, M. (2018). Membangun Budaya Literasi Bagi Suplemen Pendidikan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Dikdas Bantara, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.32585/jdb.v1i1.105
  30. Suzanti, T. (2016). INTERAKSI EDUKATIF DALAM PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR SOSIOLOGI DI SMA NEGERI 1 BUNGORO KABUPATEN PANGKEP. jurnal sosialisasi pendidikan sosiologi-FIS UNM, 3(2), 1–5. http://ojs.unm.ac.id/sosialisasi/article/view/2376
  31. Tohir, M. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun Dibanding Tahun 2015. December 2019, 10–12. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/pcjvx
  32. Wandasari, Y. (2017). Implementasi gerakan literasi sekolah (gls) sebagai pembentuk pendidikan berkarakter. JMKSP: Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 1(1), 325–343.