JSHE

Article Details

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): May

Perception of Distance Learning in Bangladeshi Tertiary Education: Prospects and Obstacles in the Covid-19 Era

https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v1i3.532
17 May 2021

Abstract

Purpose: The key purpose of the study is to understand the university students' perception of a sudden distance learning platform from Bangladesh (a least developed countries' perspective).

Methodology: This particular study has employed a qualitative research method with the support of interview and observation methods. The study has selected 20 University students as a sample size based on purposive sampling.

Results: The findings provide a vivid outline of the current situation of the universities- that the students have- over the influence of distance learning on education, technology, their university, course instructors, and themselves.

Conclusions: This study examines Least Developed Countries (LDC) students’ perceptions of distance learning, highlighting adaptability opportunities and recommendations to improve quality and reduce barriers.

Limitations: The data was qualitative in nature and the study only interviewed the university students but not the other stakeholders of that system; in addition, the study did not triangulate the data with more quantitative data.

Contributions: The study contributes to literature on university education in LDC and benefits higher education institutions facing distance learning prospects and obstacles during and after COVID-19.

Keywords

Covid-19 Distance Learning University Students' Perception

How to Cite

Hossain, S. M. S., & Khan, M. R. (2021). Perception of Distance Learning in Bangladeshi Tertiary Education: Prospects and Obstacles in the Covid-19 Era. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 1(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v1i3.532

References

  1. Alshurideh, M., Kurdi, B. A., & Salloum, S. A. (2019). Examining the main mobile learning system drivers’ effects: A mix empirical examination of both the Expectation-Confirmation Model (ECM) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics, 406-417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31129-2_37
  2. Andersson, A., & Grönlund, Å. (2009). A conceptual framework for e?learning in developing countries: A critical review of research challenges. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 38(1), 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2009.tb00271.x
  3. Betts, K., & Heaston, A. (2014). Build it but will they teach?: Strategies for increasing faculty participation & retention in online & blended education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 17(2), 1-13.
  4. Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843-855. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010
  5. BritishCouncil. (2020). Continuing Academic Activities Online in Higher Education Institutions. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org.bd/en/continuing-academic-activities-online-higher-education-institutions
  6. Cacault, M. P., Hildebrand, C., Laurent-Lucchetti, J., & Pellizzari, M. (2020). Distance learning in higher education: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(4), 2322-2372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvaa060
  7. Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483-499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018406069584
  8. Daley, C., Cornet, V., Patekar, G., Kosarabe, S., Bolchini, D., Toscos, T., Ghahari, R. R. (2019). Uncertainty management among older adults with heart failure: responses to receiving implanted device data using a fictitious scenario interview method. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care, 8(1), 127-130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857919081030
  9. Daroedono, E., Siagian, F. E., Alfarabi, M., Cing, J. M., Arodes, E. S., Sirait, R. H., Wiyanto, M. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on medical education: our students perception on the practice of long distance learning. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 7(7), 2790-2796. doi:https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20202545
  10. Giovannella, C. (2020). Effect induced by the Covid-19 pandemic on students’ perception about technologies and distance learning. Ludic, Co-design and Tools Supporting Smart Learning Ecosystems and Smart Education, 105-116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7383-5_9
  11. Goodell, J. W. (2020). COVID-19 and finance: Agendas for future research. Finance Research Letters, 35, 1-5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101512
  12. Handoko, B. L. (2019). Technology acceptance model in higher education online business. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(5), 1-9.
  13. Harrison, M., Quisias, J., Frew, E. J., & Albon, S. P. (2019). A cost-benefit analysis of teaching and learning technology in a faculty of pharmaceutical sciences. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(6), 1310-1319. doi:https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6834
  14. Holmes, W., Nguyen, Q., Zhang, J., Mavrikis, M., & Rienties, B. (2019). Learning analytics for learning design in online distance learning. Distance Education, 40(3), 309-329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1637716
  15. Hossain, I. (2020). Coronavirus: 63 Universities Taking Online Classes Across Bangladesh. Retrieved from https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/health/208314/coronavirus-63-universities-taking-online-classes
  16. Inman, E., Kerwin, M., & Mayes, L. (1999). Instructor and student attitudes toward distance learning. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 23(6), 581-591. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/106689299264594
  17. Isaias, P., Reis, F., Coutinho, C., & Lencastre, J. A. (2017). Empathic technologies for distance/mobile learning: An empirical research based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(2), 159-180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2017-0014
  18. Islam, M. T., & Sel?m, A. S. M. (2006). Current status and prospects for e-learning in the promotion of distance education in Bangladesh. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 1-9.
  19. Khan, M. R. (2019). Samson H. Chowdhury: A true entrepreneurial leader for Square Group. EuroMed Journal of Management, 3(2), 80-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/EMJM.2019.104323
  20. Khan, M. R. (2020). Ethical business practice and short term earning intensity during the Covid-19 crisis in Bangladesh. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 2(2), 79-93. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v2i2.167
  21. Khan, M. R., Hossain, S., & Rabbi, M. M. I. (2018). The strategic environment analysis of Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited (IBBL). IIUM Journal of Case Studies in Management, 9(1), 28-41.
  22. Khan, M. R., Rana, S., & Hosen, M. I. (2021). Impact of trustworthiness on the usage of m-banking apps: A study on Bangladeshi consumers. Business Perspectives and Research, 10(2), 234-250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337211001969
  23. Khan, M. R., Roy, S. K., & Hossain, S. (2019). Factors affecting garments employees’ perception on job performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 8(1), 32-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.11.2019.81.32.47
  24. Khan, M. R., & Sharma, K. (2020). Purchase preferences and buying influences on religious occasions. FIIB Business Review, 9(3), 216-227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714520942624
  25. Kinney, L., Liu, M., & Thornton, M. A. (2012). Faculty and student perceptions of online learning in engineering education. 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--21387
  26. Latham, J. R. (2013). A framework for leading the transformation to performance excellence part I: CEO perspectives on forces, facilitators, and strategic leadership systems. Quality Management Journal, 20(2), 12-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2013.11918095
  27. Latham, J. R. (2020). Qualitative Sample Size – How Many Participants is Enough?. Retrieved from https://www.drjohnlatham.com/many-participants-enough/
  28. Laurillard, D. (2007). Modelling benefits-oriented costs for technology enhanced learning. Higher Education, 54(1), 21-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9044-2
  29. Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  30. Law, K. M., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021
  31. Lee, K. (2020). Coronavirus: Universities are Shifting Classes Online – But it’s Not as Easy as it Sounds. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-universities-are-shifting-classes-online-but-its-not-as-easy-as-it-sounds-133030
  32. Legon, R., & Garrett, R. (2018). The Changing Landscape of Online Education (Chloe) 2: A Deeper Dive: Quality Matters & Eduventures Survey of Chief Online Officers. Boston: Eduventures Research.
  33. Ma, L., & Lee, C. S. (2019). Understanding the barriers to the use of MOOCs in a developing country: An innovation resistance perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(3), 571-590. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118757732
  34. MacDonald, J. (2017). Blended Learning and Online Tutoring: Planning Learner Support and Activity Design. New York: Routledge.
  35. Mansbach, J., & Austin, A. E. (2018). Nuanced perspectives about online teaching: Mid-career and senior faculty voices reflecting on academic work in the digital age. Innovative Higher Education, 43(4), 257-272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-018-9424-4
  36. Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23(1), 184-205. doi:https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1329
  37. Onyema, E. M., Deborah, E. C., Alsayed, A. O., Noorulhasan, Q., & Sanober, S. (2019). Online discussion forum as a tool for interactive learning and communication. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4), 4852-4859. doi:https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D8062.118419
  38. Onyema, E. M., Ogechukwu, U., Anthonia, E. C. D., & Deborah, E. (2019). Potentials of mobile technologies in enhancing the effectiveness of inquiry-based learning approach. International Journal of Education (IJE), 2(1), 1-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.5121/IJE.2019.1421
  39. Pena-Bandalaria, M. d. (2007). Impact of ICTs on open and distance learning in a developing country setting: The Philippine experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(1), 1-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i1.334
  40. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Hungler, B. P. (2004). Lehrbuch Pflegeforschung: Methodik, Beurteilung und Anwendung. Pflege, 17(6), 411-412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302.17.6.411b
  41. Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2009). Interviewing in qualitative research: The one-to-one interview. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(6), 309-314. doi:https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2009.16.6.42433
  42. Saunders, F. C., Brooks, J., & Dawson, M. (2020). Exploring staff attitudes to distance learning–what are the opportunities, challenges and impacts on engineering academics and instructional designers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(5), 675-690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1677562
  43. Schweisfurth, M. (2011). Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem?. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(5), 425-432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.03.005
  44. Setiawan, A. R., & Ilmiyah, S. (2020). Students’ worksheet for distance learning based on scientific literacy in the topic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). EdArXiv, 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/6t9a5
  45. Shah, S., Bellows, B. A., Adedipe, A. A., Totten, J. E., Backlund, B. H., & Sajed, D. (2015). Perceived barriers in the use of ultrasound in developing countries. Critical Ultrasound Journal, 7(1), 1-5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-015-0028-2
  46. Sherry, L. (1995). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 337-365.
  47. Siemens, G., Gasevic, D., & Dawson, S. (2015). Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. doi:https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3515.8483
  48. Stevenson, K., Sander, P., & Naylor, P. (1996). Student perceptions of the tutor's role in distance learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 11(1), 22-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051960110103
  49. Trochim, W. M. (2005). Research Methods: The Concise Knowledge Base. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog Publishing.
  50. Tynan, B., Ryan, Y., & Lamont?Mills, A. (2015). Examining workload models in online and blended teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 5-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12111
  51. Valencia-Arias, A., Chalela-Naffah, S., & Bermúdez-Hernández, J. (2019). A proposed model of e-learning tools acceptance among university students in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1057-1071. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9815-2
  52. VOANews. (2020). UNESCO: 290 Million Students Stay Home due to Coronavirus. Retrieved from https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/unesco-290-million-students-stay-home-due-to-coronavirus/5317148.html
  53. Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2008). Who is responsible for e-learning success in higher education? A stakeholders' analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 26-36.
  54. Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning, 21(1), 15-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.761
  55. Xia, B. S. (2015). Benefit and cost analysis of massive open online courses: Pedagogical implications on higher education. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 5(3), 47-55. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2015070104
  56. Zheng, Y., Ghane, N., & Sabouri, M. (2019). Personalized educational learning with multi-stakeholder optimizations. Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, 283-289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3314183.3323843

Author Biographies

S. M. Sabbih Hossain Assistant Professor, Department of English, City University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

S. M. Sabbih Hossain is working as an Assistant Professor of English in the Department of English, City University, Bangladesh. He has one book, three journal articles and one conference paper as of date. He earned his BA (Hons) and MA (in Literature) from Rajshahi University, Bangladesh. His major research interests are language, education, literature and translation studies. He professionally serves as an editorial review board member of IDEAS- A Journal of literature Arts and Culture. He is working as a member-secretary of the Research Cell of City University. In his leisure time he writes articles for various websites as a freelancer.

Md. Rahat Khan Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, City University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Md. Rahat Khan is working as an Assistant Professor in Management under Department of Business Administration, City University, Bangladesh. He has three books, nineteen journal articles and three conference papers as of date. He earned his BBS (Hons) and MBS in Management from National University, Bangladesh and MBA in Marketing & Finance from IBA, Jahangirnagar University from Bangladesh. His major research interests are HR and management practice and implications along with strategic issues in business and management. He professionally serves as an Editorial review board member of FIIB Business Review (SAGE Inc.) and Khatulistiwa Journal of Islamic Studies (Indonesia) along with an ad hoc reviewer of Business: Theory and Practice (SCOPUS Indexed Journal), Business Management & Education, numerous journals of SAGE publishing, Journal of Springer Nature, Emerald Insight and The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention. He is also servings Editorial Member position of SCIREA Journal of Sociology; two international journals of David publishing and JOBMER.

WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email