AHRMR

Article Details

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): June

The Role of Transformational Leadership, High-Performance Work Systems, and Psychological Capital in Work Engagement

https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v6i2.3928

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the direct and indirect effects of Transformational Leadership (TL), High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS), and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) on Job Involvement (JI), with Work Engagement (WE) as the mediating mechanism.

Research Methodology: This study used a quantitative method and survey design. All 300 active personnel of the 461st Pasgat Battalion of the Indonesian Air Force who met the minimum service requirements were included as respondents. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using SEM-PLS with bootstrapping.

Results: TL, HPWS, and PsyCap significantly and positively influenced WE. Work Engagement (WE) also had a significant positive effect on JI. TL, HPWS, and PsyCap had significant direct effects on JI. The indirect effect results show that WE partially mediate the relationships between TL, HPWS, PsyCap, and JI, indicating that stronger leadership, better HR systems, and stronger psychological resources improve job involvement more effectively when they first increase engagement.

Conclusions: Job involvement in the studied military unit is strengthened directly by leadership, high-performance work systems, and psychological capital, and indirectly through work engagement. Therefore, WE function as a key explanatory mechanism in the model.

Limitations: The study is limited to one military unit, uses self-reported cross-sectional data, and does not include other contextual predictors such as job demands, leadership climate, or perceived organizational support.

Contributions: This study reinforces the importance of integrating TL, HPWS, and PsyCap development to improve WE and JI in military settings. It also encourages future studies to adopt mixed-method approaches.

Keywords

High-Performance Work Systems Job Involvement Psychological Capital Transformational Leadership Work Engagement

How to Cite

Marsono, M., Faeni, D. P., & Kemalsyah, H. M. (2026). The Role of Transformational Leadership, High-Performance Work Systems, and Psychological Capital in Work Engagement . Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 6(2), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v6i2.3928

References

  1. Al Basyir, L., Madhakomala, R., & Handaru, A. (2020). The effect of transformational leadership, organizational communication and job involvement toward withdrawal behavior. Management Science Letters, 10(7), 1623-1632. doi:https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.12.004
  2. Alessandri, G., Consiglio, C., Luthans, F., & Borgogni, L. (2018). Testing a dynamic model of the impact of psychological capital on work engagement and job performance. Career Development International, 23(1), 33-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2016-0210
  3. Arefin, M. S., Alam, M. S., Islam, M. R., & Rahaman, M. (2019). High-performance work systems and job engagement: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1664204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1664204
  4. Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207
  5. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 25-53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
  6. Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Derks, D. (2016). Who takes the lead? A multi?source diary study on leadership, work engagement, and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(3), 309-325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2041
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. New York: Sage Publications.
  8. Daswati, D., Wirawan, H., Hattab, S., Salam, R., & Iskandar, A. S. (2022). The effect of psychological capital on performance through the role of career engagement: Evidence from Indonesian public organizations. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 1-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.2012971
  9. Demir, S. (2018). The relationship between psychological capital and stress, anxiety, burnout, job satisfaction, and job involvement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 75, 137-153. doi:https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2018.75.8
  10. Deng, C., Gulseren, D., Isola, C., Grocutt, K., & Turner, N. . (2023). Transformational leadership effectiveness: An evidence-based primer. Human Resource Development International, 26(5), 627–641. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2135938
  11. Giancaspro, M. L., Callea, A., & Manuti, A. (2022). “I like it like that”: A study on the relationship between psychological capital, work engagement and extra-role behavior. Sustainability, 14(4), 1-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042022
  12. Grover, S. L., Teo, S. T., Pick, D., Roche, M., & Newton, C. J. (2018). Psychological capital as a personal resource in the JD-R model. Personnel Review, 47(4), 968-984. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2016-0213
  13. Haider, S., De-Pablos-Heredero, C., & De-Pablos-Heredero, M. (2020). A three-wave longitudinal study of moderated mediation between high-performance work systems and employee job satisfaction: The role of relational coordination and peer justice climate. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00792
  14. Hansen, C., Usanova, K., & Geraudel, M. (2025). A meta-analysis on the effects of high-performance work practices in small and medium-sized enterprises: An exploration of organizational-and individual-level outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 24, 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00572
  15. Harris, C., Jacobs, C., & Stindt, C. . (2025). Psychological capital as a predictor of work engagement in a training academy. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 1-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v23i0.3207
  16. Hngoi, C. L., Abdullah, N.-A., Wan Sulaiman, W. S., & Zaiedy Nor, N. I. (2024). Examining job involvement and perceived organizational support toward organizational commitment: job insecurity as mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1290122
  17. Hossain, A., Khatun, M., & Shanjabin, S. (2024). Impact of person-job fit and person-organization fit on employee engagement: Moderating role of supervisor support. Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 3(2), 97-114. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v3i2.1885
  18. Huang, L.-C., Ahlstrom, D., Lee, A. Y.-P., Chen, S.-Y., & Hsieh, M.-J. (2016). High performance work systems, employee well-being, and job involvement: An empirical study. Personnel Review, 45(2), 296-314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2014-0201
  19. Huang, Y., Ma, Z., & Meng, Y. (2018). High?performance work systems and employee engagement: empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(3), 341-359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12140
  20. Jiang, Z., Wu, C.-H., Xu, A. J., & Van De Voorde, K. (2026). Thriving at work: A synthesis of human resource management perspectives and a future research agenda. Human Resource Management, 65(1), 133–149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.70017
  21. Karatepe, O. M., & Olugbade, O. A. (2016). The mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between high-performance work practices and job outcomes of employees in Nigeria. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(10), 2350-2371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2015-0145
  22. Kloutsiniotis, P. V., & Mihail, D. M. (2020). The effects of high performance work systems in employees’ service-oriented OCB. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90, 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102610
  23. Kotzé, M. (2018). How job resources and personal resources influence work engagement and burnout. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 44, 148-164. doi:Khttps://doi.org/10.1177/0081246317705812
  24. Kuroki, M., & Shirinashihama, Y. (2025). Target difficulty, psychological capital, and work engagement. European Accounting Review, 34(5), 2077-2099. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2025.2451153
  25. Lai, F.-Y., Tang, H.-C., Lu, S.-C., Lee, Y.-C., & Lin, C.-C. (2020). Transformational leadership and job performance: The mediating role of work engagement. Sage Open, 10(1), 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899085
  26. Lailla, N., Rao, D. G., Hakim, L., & Nugroho, W. S. . (2025). The role of grit and self-efficacy in teacher engagement and burnout. Annals of Human Resource Management Research. Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 5(4), 15–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v5i4.3177
  27. Lee, M. C. C., Idris, M. A., & Tuckey, M. . (2019). Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development International, 22(3), 257–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2018.1530170
  28. Mustajab, D., & Darmayanti, N. (2024). Psychological Capital, Leader-member Exchange, and Job Involvement in Shaping Innovative Behavior and Work Habits: Evidence From A Non-banking Financial Entity in Jawa and Papua. Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 4(2), 193-212. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v4i2.3003
  29. Nawaz, N., Gajenderan, V., Manoharan, M., & Parayitam, S. (2024). Disentangling the relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement: Employee empowerment as a mediator and work experience and gender as moderators. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 1-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2291851
  30. Neuber, L., Englitz, C., Schulte, N., Forthmann, B., & Holling, H. (2022). How work engagement relates to performance and absenteeism: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(2), 292-315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1953989
  31. Saleem, M. S., Isha, A. S. N., Yusop, Y. M., Awan, M. I., & Naji, G. M. A. (2022). The role of psychological capital and work engagement in enhancing construction workers' safety behavior. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.810145
  32. Srivastava, S., Rao, M. K., & Ganesh, P. . (2026). Impact of high-performance work systems on employee performance in knowledge-based service organizations: A moderated mediation model. Global Business Review. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509251415305
  33. Tripathi, A., & Kumar, A. (2023). Demystifying the effect of high-performance work systems on job involvement based on dual-path mediation model. American Business Review, 26(1), 226-224. doi:https://doi.org/10.37625/abr.26.1.226-244
  34. Trisnawati, A. A., Sianto, K., Seansyah, L. A., & Saputra, N. (2021). Holistic work engagement pada tenaga kesehatan di kota Jakarta Barat: Pengaruh digital quotient, authentic leadership, dan perceived organizational support selama Covid-19. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan dan Manajemen, 2(4), 255-278. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v2i4.425
  35. Trung, C. T. T., Teh, C. J., & Tee, P. K. . (2026). The impact of psychological capital on employee work engagement in Vietnam’s securities firms: The mediating role of psychological well-being and the moderating role of perceived organizational support. Cogent Business & Management, 13(1), 1-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2654115
  36. Van Tuin, L., Schaufeli, W. B., & Van den Broeck, A. (2021). Engaging leadership: Enhancing work engagement through intrinsic values and need satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(4), 483-505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21430
  37. Wu, W.-L., & Lee, Y.-C. (2020). Do work engagement and transformational leadership facilitate knowledge sharing? A perspective of conservation of resources theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 1-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072615
  38. Yu, X., Xiong, Z., Li, W., Zhang, H., Li, X., & Xiao, W. . (2025). Teacher professional identity on work engagement: The moderating roles of ego-resilience and perceived organizational support. Frontiers in Psychology 16, 1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1657911
WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email