AHRMR

Article Details

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): June

The Effectiveness of Counter-Narratives in Information Warfare: A Systematic Review for National Security Resilience

https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v6i2.3973

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to systematically identify and evaluate the effectiveness of various counter-narrative strategies in responding to the threats of disinformation and hybrid warfare, given that information warfare has evolved into a cognitive threat targeting public psychology and the pillars of democracy.

Research Methodology: Using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, this study analyzed 20 core articles selected from the Dimensions database (screened from 8,425 initial results) with a publication range of 2023–2025. Data were synthesized using thematic analysis.

Results: The findings indicate that the effectiveness of counter-narratives is not determined by their intrinsic factual truth but rather depends heavily on the alignment of the narrative with the worldview and media consumption habits of the target audience.

Conclusions: This study concludes that effective counter-narrative strategies have shifted from reactive responses (debunking) to proactive interventions (pre-bunking) and strategic leadership narratives (statecraft) over the years. Successful implementation requires a coordinated, AI-enabled response architecture, which presents a fundamental dilemma for democracies regarding the balance between national security and freedom of speech.

Limitations: This study was limited to academic literature indexed in the Dimensions database, potentially excluding relevant grey literature or closed policy documents.

Contributions: This study provides strategic insights into the evolution of information warfare responses, highlighting the necessity of proactive measures and ethical challenges in protecting democratic values against cognitive threats.

Keywords

Counter-Narratives Effectiveness Information Warfare National Security Systematic Literature Review (SLR)

How to Cite

Singgih, J. A., Taufik, R. M., & Saputro, G. E. (2026). The Effectiveness of Counter-Narratives in Information Warfare: A Systematic Review for National Security Resilience . Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 6(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v6i2.3973

References

  1. Arribas, C. M., Arcos, R., Gértrudix, M., Mikulski, K., Hernández-Escayola, P., Teodor, M., García-Jiménez, A. (2023). Information manipulation and historical revisionism: Russian disinformation and foreign interference through manipulated history-based narratives. Open Research Europe, 3, 1-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/OPENRESEUROPE.16087.1
  2. Bakhshilloyevich, R. B. (2025). Social-philosophical analysis of concepts of peace and cooperation between nations. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies, 3(3), 221-231. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jomaps.v3i3.3273
  3. Bakirov, A., & Suleimenov, I. (2025). Theoretical bases of methods of counteraction to modern forms of information warfare. Computers, 14(10), 1-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14100410
  4. Braddock, K., & Horgan, J. (2016). Towards a Guide for constructing and disseminating counternarratives to reduce support for terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39(5), 381-404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2015.1116277
  5. Chan, M. P. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1531-1546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714579
  6. Chesney, R., & Citron, D. (2019). Deepfakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107(6), 1753-1820. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3213954
  7. Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 118(9), 1-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
  8. Djansena, A., Yusman, F., Sembiring, H., Parwata, I. N., Midhio, I. W., Yusgiantoro, P., Kartiningsih, Y. (2025). On the verge of nuclear war: Global security challenges and dynamics in maintaining world peace. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 5(3), 239-253. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v5i3.2908
  9. Duarte, F. P., Ramos, J. P., Barbosa, P., Vergani, M., & de Carvalho, C. M. (2025). PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of Educational Programmes to Prevent and Counter Online Violent Extremist Propaganda in English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, German and Scandinavian Language Studies: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 21(2), 1-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70042
  10. Fallis, D. (2015). What is disinformation?. Library Trends, 63(3), 401-426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2015.0014
  11. Goldstein, J. A., Sastry, G., Musser, M., DiResta, R., Rubinovitz, G., & Thompson, K. (2023). Generative language models and automated influence operations: Emerging threats and potential mitigations. arXiv Preprint, 1-67. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04246
  12. Govindankutty, S., & Gopalan, S. P. (2024). Epidemic modeling for misinformation spread in digital networks through a social intelligence approach. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69657-0
  13. Hermawan, W., Respationo, S., Erniyanti, E., & Fadlan, F. (2022). Juridical analysis of the involvement of the Indonesian National Army in countering criminal acts of terrorism criminal acts of terrorism. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 2(1), 11-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v2i1.1803
  14. Hilte, L., Markov, I., Ljubeši?, N., Fišer, D., & Daelemans, W. (2023). Who are the haters? A corpus-based demographic analysis of authors of hate speech. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/FRAI.2023.986890
  15. Hybrid Co, E. (2025). Social Identities and Democratic Vulnerabilities: Learning from Examples of Targeted Disinformation. Retrieved from https://hybridcoe.fi
  16. Ismail, H. (2024). Interpretation of the prohibition on doing business in the field of forex trading for soldiers of the Indonesian National Army reviewed from Article 39 Number 3 of Law Number 34 of 2004 Concerning The Indonesian National Army. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 3(2), 127-144. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v3i2.2872
  17. Kustiawan, B., & Ghazalie, G. (2025). The role of leadership in increasing effectiveness national defense human resource management. Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 5(1), 137-147. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v5i1.2865
  18. Le, L. (2024). Media frame and audience cognitive bias: Assessing news effectiveness from a social psychological perspective. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 4(2), 35-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.62051/IJSSPA.V4N2.05
  19. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
  20. Liagusha, A., & Iarovyi, D. (2025). Memes, freedom, and resilience to information disorders: Information warfare between democracies and autocracies. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSAHO.2024.101247
  21. Madrid-Morales, D., Wasserman, H., & Ahmed, S. (2024). The geopolitics of disinformation: worldviews, media consumption and the adoption of global strategic disinformation narratives. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 36(3), 1-37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/IJPOR/EDAD042
  22. McKee, M., Pagel, C., & Buse, K. (2024). Disinformation enabled Donald Trump’s second term and is a crisis for democracies everywhere. BMJ, 387, 1-5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.Q2485
  23. Mercy, C. (2020). The Weaponization of Social Media. Retrieved from https://mercycorps.org
  24. Miskimmon, A., O'Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order: New York: Routledge.
  25. Mundia, M. (2026). A Comparative Study of Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Technology Tools in Developing Oral Communication Skills. Universal Teaching and Learning Journal, 2(1), 11-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/utlj.v2i1.3925
  26. Oullet, E., D’Agata, M., & Stewart, K. (2024). Deterrence in the 21st Century: Canada: University of Calgary Press.
  27. Padalko, H., Chomko, V., Yakovlev, S., & Morita, P. P. (2024). Classification of disinformation in hybrid warfare: An application of xlnet during the russia’s war against Ukraine. Radioelectronic and Computer Systems, 4(112), 46-58. doi:https://doi.org/10.32620/REKS.2024.4.04
  28. Paziuk, A., Lande, D., Shnurko-Tabakova, E., & Kingston, P. (2025). Decoding manipulative narratives in cognitive warfare: a case study of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/FRAI.2025.1566022
  29. Prysiazhniuk, M. (2025). Strategic Narratives and Information Warfare: Russian FIMI Campaigns against Ukraine’s Armed Forces in the Context of War and Societal Impact. Culture. Society. Economy. Politics, 5(1), 88-108. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/CSEP-2025-0007
  30. Putter, D. (2025). Navigating the interplay of cognitive warfare and counterintelligence in African security strategies: insights and case studies. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 20(2), 173-192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2024.2440873
  31. Roozenbeek, J., van der Linden, S., Goldberg, B., Rathje, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022). Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media. Science Advances, 8(34), 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo6254
  32. Šenk, M., & Hynek, N. (2025). NATO/EU synergies against information warfare: a “circulatory institutionalist” model of expert voluntarism. European Security, 35(2), 254-275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2025.2566519
  33. Skiba, R. (2024). Examining the ideological foundations, psychological influences, and media representation of extremism and its social impact. Advances in Applied Sociology, 14(9), 469-503. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/AASOCI.2024.149033
  34. Sommarberg, S., Ketola, M., Huhtinen, A. M., & Sederholm, T. (2024). Counterforces and Detection of Disinformation. In P. Uusikylä, H. Jalonen, & A. Jokipii (Eds.), Information Resilience and Comprehensive Security: Challenges and Complexities in Wicked Environments (pp. 181-204). Cham: Springer.
  35. Stumbrys, V. (2024). Some elements of defining information warfare. Public Security & Public Order/Visuomenes Saugumas Ir Viesoji Tvarka, 35(35), 284-298. doi:https://doi.org/10.13165/PSPO-24-35-21
  36. Szostek, J., & Orlova, D. (2024). Free speech versus defence of the nation? The media as sources of national insecurity in Ukraine. European Security, 33(1), 82-106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2023.2231369
  37. Triharyono, E., Damanik, Y. D., & Ghazalie, G. (2025). Implications of Indonesia's Joining the BRICS on National Defense and Security Strategy. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 5(3), 255-266. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v5i3.2903
  38. Trufanov, G. (2025). The European Integration as a Strategic Source for the Ukrainian Democratic Media and the EU in Countering Russian Propaganda. Journal of Advanced Military Studies, 16(1), 109-135. doi:https://doi.org/10.21140/MCUJ.20251601006
  39. Wang, L., & Wang, R. (2024). Cyber warfare: a study of Zelenskyy’s social media political performance strategies and effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2024.1478639
  40. Wigell, M. (2021). Hybrid interference as a wedge strategy: a theory of external interference in liberal democracies. International Affairs, 97(1), 255-274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa188
  41. Wilson, M., Vélez, M., & Lavis, J. (2023). Impact of strategies to mitigate misinformation in diverse settings and populations: a protocol for a living evidence synthesis. BMJ Open, 13(10), 1-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2023-076672
  42. Zhou, J., Zhang, Y., Luo, Q., Parker, A. G., & De Choudhury, M. (2023). Synthetic lies: Understanding AI-generated misinformation and evaluating algorithmic and human solutions. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581318.
  43. Zulfa, M. D., Raharjo, E., & Shafira, M. (2022). Policy formulation crime contempt of court based on the national criminal code. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 2(1), 37-48. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v2i1.1969
WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email