Alternative settlement of dispute between Israel and Palestine

https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i1.1382
Published: Jan 9, 2023

Abstract:

Purpose: This research purpose is to find an alternative dispute between Israel and Palestine so that human rights are not being deprived anymore.

Research methodology: The approach in this study was carried out by deepening research by reading literature related to the problem that became the topic, namely the dispute between Palestine and Israel.

Results: The results obtained from this study are that the dispute between Israel and Palestine is still experiencing obstacles in the implementation of resolution no. 181 so that there is a need for follow-up from the UN security council and the UN general assembly so that the dispute can be resolved immediately

Limitations: This research has not explained how the implementation of the solution that has been given.

Contribution: Analyze how the right way to resolve the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

Keywords:
1. Israel
2. Palestine
3. dispute
Authors:
1 . Narita Tarasari
Faculty of law, Pembangunan Nasional 'Veteran' University, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
2 . Addelia Aizah R
Faculty of law, Pembangunan Nasional 'Veteran' University, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
3 . Ajeng Althafira A
Faculty of law, Pembangunan Nasional 'Veteran' University, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
4 . Zahra Nasywa
Faculty of law, Pembangunan Nasional 'Veteran' University, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
5 . Fikri Fajar M
Faculty of law, Pembangunan Nasional 'Veteran' University, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
View PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): December
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

    Chirozva, L., & Damba, R. (2021). The law of treaties in Africa: Exploring the Southern African development community mutual defence pact. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i1.781

    Firdaus, A. Y., & Yani, Y. M. (2021). Faktor Penghambat Perdamaian Konflik Palestina – Israel. Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(9), 109. https://doi.org/10.47313/ppl.v5i9.824

    Gray, C. (2004). The icj advisory opinion on legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied palestinian territory. In Cambridge Law Journal, 63(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197304226678

    Herman, A., & Nurdiansa, J. (2010). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Konflik Israel - Palestina dalam Harian Kompas dan Radar Sulteng. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Volume 8,(Mei-Agustus 2010), 154–169.

    ICC. (2021). ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I issues its decision on the Prosecutor’s request related to territorial jurisdiction over Palestine. International Criminal Court, 12(2), 2–4. https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=pr1566

    Khan, M. R., & Sultana, R. (2021). Shift in the role of criminology in criminal law: Reflecting the doctrinal change. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(1), 1–10.

    Muchsin, M. A. (2015). PALESTINA DAN ISRAEL: Sejarah, Konflik dan Masa Depan. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 39(2), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v39i2.32

    Rudi, M. R. (2007). POKOK-POKOK HUKUM HAK ASASI MANUSIA INTERNASIONAL. 31, 1–8.

    Sumertha, I. G., Ismadi, A., & Wibowo, H. A. (2017). Keterlibatan Pemerintah Indonesia dalam Proses Perdamaian Konflik Israel-Palestina. Jurnal Prodi Damai Dan Resolusi Konflik Universitas Pertahanan, 3(1), 1–28.

    Verzijl, J. H. W. (1963). International Court of Justice. Netherlands International Law Review, 10(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X00027789

    Wirajaya, A. C. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Palestina Dan Israel Menurut Hukum Internasional (Study Kasus Perampasan Wilayah Palestina Di Israel). Lex Et Societatis, 8(4), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v8i4.30909

  1. Chirozva, L., & Damba, R. (2021). The law of treaties in Africa: Exploring the Southern African development community mutual defence pact. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v1i1.781
  2. Firdaus, A. Y., & Yani, Y. M. (2021). Faktor Penghambat Perdamaian Konflik Palestina – Israel. Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(9), 109. https://doi.org/10.47313/ppl.v5i9.824
  3. Gray, C. (2004). The icj advisory opinion on legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied palestinian territory. In Cambridge Law Journal, 63(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197304226678
  4. Herman, A., & Nurdiansa, J. (2010). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Konflik Israel - Palestina dalam Harian Kompas dan Radar Sulteng. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Volume 8,(Mei-Agustus 2010), 154–169.
  5. ICC. (2021). ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I issues its decision on the Prosecutor’s request related to territorial jurisdiction over Palestine. International Criminal Court, 12(2), 2–4. https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=pr1566
  6. Khan, M. R., & Sultana, R. (2021). Shift in the role of criminology in criminal law: Reflecting the doctrinal change. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 1(1), 1–10.
  7. Muchsin, M. A. (2015). PALESTINA DAN ISRAEL: Sejarah, Konflik dan Masa Depan. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 39(2), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v39i2.32
  8. Rudi, M. R. (2007). POKOK-POKOK HUKUM HAK ASASI MANUSIA INTERNASIONAL. 31, 1–8.
  9. Sumertha, I. G., Ismadi, A., & Wibowo, H. A. (2017). Keterlibatan Pemerintah Indonesia dalam Proses Perdamaian Konflik Israel-Palestina. Jurnal Prodi Damai Dan Resolusi Konflik Universitas Pertahanan, 3(1), 1–28.
  10. Verzijl, J. H. W. (1963). International Court of Justice. Netherlands International Law Review, 10(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X00027789
  11. Wirajaya, A. C. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Palestina Dan Israel Menurut Hukum Internasional (Study Kasus Perampasan Wilayah Palestina Di Israel). Lex Et Societatis, 8(4), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v8i4.30909