AMOR

Article Details

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2026): May

Beyond Technical Barriers: A Soft Systems-Regression Framework for Scaling Industrial Energy Efficiency Adoption

https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v7i4.3992

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines how stakeholder engagement, financial support, policy frameworks, and technology awareness shape sustainable energy efficiency adoption among Indonesian SMEs and corporations, where only 30% of conservation potential is realized despite existing incentives.

Research Methodology: This study used a two-phase hybrid design. Phase one applied SSM with focus group discussions, interviews, and CATWOE analysis to map policy fragmentation. In Phase two, 303 firms in Jakarta, Tangerang, and Bekasi completed structured questionnaires with a 42-item Likert scale, and three-tier regression models examined adoption, viability, and alignment pathways.

Results: The SSM identified SEE adoption as a wicked problem due to stakeholder conflicts and institutional misalignment. Three-tier regression showed policy support as the strongest predictor, explaining 60.9% of the adoption variance. Performance impact and market readiness explained 57% of the viability variance, while staff capacity accounted for 52.9% of the alignment variance.

Conclusions: Scaling SEE adoption requires institutional coherence, stakeholder alignment, and organizational readiness. Coherent policy frameworks, performance- based financing, and collaborative governance that integrate sociocultural and technical realities are essential for making meaningful progress.

Limitations: The study was limited to Greater Jakarta, which limits generalizability, and the cross-sectional design cannot confirm causal direction. SSM was applied only through stage six; future research should extend the framework longitudinally across diverse regions and industries.

Contributions: This is the first study to integrate SSM with three-tier regression for energy conservation in Indonesia. It introduces a performance-based blended finance model that links microcredit repayments to verified energy savings tracked in real time via smart meters.

Keywords

Energy Efficiency Policy Support Soft Systems Methodology Sustainable Three-Tier Regression

How to Cite

Herlan, H., Sudarmaji, E., & Azizah, W. (2026). Beyond Technical Barriers: A Soft Systems-Regression Framework for Scaling Industrial Energy Efficiency Adoption. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 7(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v7i4.3992

References

  1. Aguinis, H., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2015). Using multilevel modeling and mixed methods to make theoretical progress in microfoundations for strategy research. Strategic Organization, 13(4), 353-364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015594622
  2. Ahmad, F., Mahatab, F., Mahmud, S., & Ehsan, M. M. (2024). Comprehensive analysis of a hybrid solar assisted supercritical CO2 reheat recompression Brayton cycle for enhanced performance. International Journal of Thermofluids, 24, 100926. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2024.100926
  3. Asean, G. (2022). Climate reporting in ASEAN: State of Corporate Practices.
  4. Balaji, B., Bhattacharya, A., Fierro, G., Gao, J., Gluck, J., Hong, D., . . . Agarwal, Y. (2016). Brick: Towards a unified metadata schema for buildings. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments.
  5. Bhavsar, P., He, Y., Chowdhury, M., Fries, R., & Shealy, A. (2014). Energy consumption reduction strategies for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles with connected vehicle technology in urban areas. Transportation Research Record, 2424(1), 29-38. doi:https://doi.org/10.3141/2424-04
  6. Brown, M. A. (2001). Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies. Energy policy, 29(14), 1197-1207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00067-2
  7. Ceriano, M., Lalk, J., & Thopil, G. A. (2024). Energy planning in sub?Saharan African telecom networks: Decision support using a soft systems methodology. Systems Engineering, 27(1), 42-53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21706
  8. Chareyron, S. (2026). The valuation of energy efficiency labels in the French housing market. Urban Studies, 00420980251410866. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251410866.
  9. Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1998). Action research: its nature and validity. Systemic practice and action research, 11(1), 9-21.
  10. Cherry, T. L., Kallbekken, S., & Kroll, S. (2017). Accepting market failure: Cultural worldviews and the opposition to corrective environmental policies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 85, 193-204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.05.004
  11. Chitnis, M., Sorrell, S., Druckman, A., Firth, S. K., & Jackson, T. (2013). Turning lights into flights: estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households. Energy policy, 55, 234-250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.008
  12. Crowe, S., Brown, K., Tregay, J., Wray, J., Knowles, R., Ridout, D. A., . . . Utley, M. (2017). Combining qualitative and quantitative operational research methods to inform quality improvement in pathways that span multiple settings. BMJ quality & safety, 26(8), 641-652. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005636
  13. Damayanti, S., Sudarmaji, E., & Masrio, H. (2024). The critical role of energy intensity in decarbonizing ASEAN: integrating growth and emissions reductions. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(3), 247-259. doi:https://doi.org//10.32479/ijeep.15059.
  14. Della Valle, N., & Bertoldi, P. (2022). Promoting energy efficiency: Barriers, societal needs and policies. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 804091. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.804091
  15. Ding, Y., Cano, Z. P., Yu, A., Lu, J., & Chen, Z. (2019). Automotive Li-ion batteries: current status and future perspectives. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 2(1), 1-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-018-0022-z
  16. Economidou, M., Todeschi, V., Bertoldi, P., D'Agostino, D., Zangheri, P., & Castellazzi, L. (2020). Review of 50 years of EU energy efficiency policies for buildings. Energy and Buildings, 225, 110322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110322
  17. Feng, W., Zhang, Q., Ji, H., Wang, R., Zhou, N., Ye, Q., . . . Lau, S. S. Y. (2019). A review of net zero energy buildings in hot and humid climates: Experience learned from 34 case study buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 114, 109303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109303
  18. Fisher, A. C., & Rothkopf, M. H. (1989). Market failure and energy policy A rationale for selective conservation. Energy policy, 17(4), 397-406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(89)90010-4
  19. Fleiter, T., Worrell, E., & Eichhammer, W. (2011). Barriers to energy efficiency in industrial bottom-up energy demand models—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6), 3099-3111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.03.025
  20. Ganvir, L., & Kalita, C. (2022). Adoption of Socio-Cultural Aspects in PSS Design for Smart Home Products: An Integrative Review. Archives of Design Research, 35(4), 7-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2022.11.35.4.7
  21. Garbuzova-Schlifter, M., & Madlener, R. (2014). Institute for Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).
  22. Gerarden, T. D., Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N. (2017). Assessing the energy-efficiency gap. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(4), 1486-1525. doi:https://doi.org//10.1257/jel.20161360
  23. Gomes Junior, A. d. A., & Schramm, V. B. (2022). Problem structuring methods: a review of advances over the last decade. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 35(1), 55-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-021-09560-1
  24. Hasanbeigi, A., & Price, L. (2015). A technical review of emerging technologies for energy and water efficiency and pollution reduction in the textile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, 30-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.079
  25. Huang, C., Zappone, A., Alexandropoulos, G. C., Debbah, M., & Yuen, C. (2019). Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for energy efficiency in wireless communication. IEEE transactions on Wireless Communications, 18(8), 4157-4170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2019.2922609
  26. Katterbauer, K., Al Zaidy, R., Al Saud, S. A., & Marsala, A. Natural Language Processing Techniques for Enhancing Formation Evaluation.
  27. Masera, O. R., Saatkamp, B. D., & Kammen, D. M. (2000). From linear fuel switching to multiple cooking strategies: a critique and alternative to the energy ladder model. World Development, 28(12), 2083-2103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00076-0
  28. Nasip, I., & Sudarmaji, E. (2018). Government measures to promote new retrofitting business and financing option in Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (IJET), 7(3.25), 531-537.
  29. Pailman, W., de Groot, J., & Massey, R. (2025). Mind the gap: Rethinking transitions along the energy access finance continuum. Energy Research & Social Science, 130, 104444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104444
  30. Parmar, M., Maturi, B., Dutt, J. M., & Phate, H. (2018). Sentiment analysis on interview transcripts: an application of NLP for quantitative analysis. Paper presented at the 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI).
  31. Peter, C. (2000). Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17(S1), 11-58.
  32. Purisari, R., & Safitri, R. Comparative Study on Green Criteria in Indonesia. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/UR.U0316338
  33. Sandoval, A. M., & Redondo, T. (2016). Text analytics: the convergence of big data and artificial intelligence. IJIMAI, 3(6), 57-64.
  34. Sarkodie, S. A., & Strezov, V. (2019). Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Science of the total environment, 646, 862-871. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365
  35. Schleich, J., & Gruber, E. (2008). Beyond case studies: Barriers to energy efficiency in commerce and the services sector. Energy Economics, 30(2), 449-464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.08.004
  36. Settanni, E., Heijungs, R., & Srai, J. S. (2023). Where have all the equations gone? A unified view on semi-quantitative problem structuring and modelling. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 74(1), 290-309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2039565
  37. Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., & Van der Werff, E. (2015). Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 144983. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00805
  38. Sudarmaji, E., Achsani, N. A., Arkeman, Y., & Fahmi, I. (2022). Decomposition factors household energy subsidy consumption in Indonesia: Kaya identity and logarithmic mean divisia index approach. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(1), 355-364. doi:https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.12629.
  39. Tiefenbeck, V., Staake, T., Roth, K., & Sachs, O. (2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy, 57, 160-171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.021
  40. Trianni, A., Cagno, E., Marchesani, F., & Spallina, G. (2017). Classification of drivers for industrial energy efficiency and their effect on the barriers affecting the investment decision-making process. Energy Efficiency, 10(1), 199-215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9455-6
  41. Wan, W., Kubendran, R., Schaefer, C., Eryilmaz, S. B., Zhang, W., Wu, D., Gao, B. (2022). A compute-in-memory chip based on resistive random-access memory. Nature, 608(7923), 504-512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04992-8
  42. Wilson, C., Hargreaves, T., & Hauxwell-Baldwin, R. (2017). Benefits and risks of smart home technologies. Energy Policy, 103, 72-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.047
  43. Zafar, S. S., Fiaz, M., Ikram, A., Khan, K. I., & Qamar, U. M. (2021). Barriers involve in the energy efficiency in the manufacturing industries of Pakistan. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(2), 293-299.
  44. Zhang, S., Wang, C., & Guo, Z. (2025). Batteries for Grid-Scale Energy Storage Applications. Adv. Mater, 16590.
WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email