AMOR

Article Details

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): August

Dynamic Capabilities, Knowledge Sharing, and Environmental Dynamism: A Mediated–Moderation Model of SME Innovation Performance

https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v8.n1.p87-106.2026

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the relationship between dynamic capabilities and innovation performance in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), with knowledge sharing as a mediator and environmental dynamism as a moderator.

Methodology: This study used a quantitative survey of 194 SMEs in Central Java. Data were collected using structured questionnaires, purposive sampling, and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis.

Results: Dynamic capabilities substantially impact innovation performance and knowledge sharing. Knowledge sharing positively influences innovation performance and mediates the effect of dynamic capabilities on it. Environmental dynamism directly and positively influences innovation performance but does not significantly strengthen the relationship between dynamic capabilities and innovation performance.

Conclusions: Dynamic capabilities improve innovation performance directly and indirectly through knowledge sharing.  Internal capabilities play a more dominant role than external environmental conditions in driving innovation.

Limitations:  This study is limited by its cross-sectional design and moderate explanatory power, indicating the possible influence of other variables.

Contributions:  This study addresses gaps in the dynamic capability and knowledge-based view literature through evidence from SMEs in developing countries and offers practical insights for managers to enhance innovation through capability development and knowledge sharing.

Keywords

Dynamic Capabilty Environment Dynamism Innovation Performance Knowledge Sharing

How to Cite

Budiati, Y., Widhiastuti, H., Indarto, I., & Lestari, R. I. (2026). Dynamic Capabilities, Knowledge Sharing, and Environmental Dynamism: A Mediated–Moderation Model of SME Innovation Performance. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 8(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v8.n1.p87-106.2026

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Abdelaziz, M. A. A., Wu, J., Yuan, C., & Ghonim, M. A. (2023). Unlocking supply chain product and process innovation through the development of supply chain learning capabilities under technological turbulence: Evidence from Egyptian SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(5), 793-819. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-11-2022-0395
  2. Abdelwhab Ali, A., Panneer selvam, D. D. D., Paris, L., & Gunasekaran, A. (2019). Key factors influencing knowledge sharing practices and its relationship with organizational performance within the oil and gas industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(9), 1806-1837. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2018-0394
  3. Abdurrahman, A., Gustomo, A., & Prasetio, E. A. (2024). Impact of dynamic capabilities on digital transformation and innovation to improve banking performance: A TOE framework study. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100215
  4. Abourokbah, S. H., Mashat, R. M., & Salam, M. A. (2023). Role of absorptive capacity, digital capability, agility, and resilience in supply chain innovation performance. Sustainability, 15(4), 3636. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043636
  5. Ahmad, B., Shafique, I., Qammar, A., Ercek, M., & Kalyar, M. N. (2024). Prompting green product and process innovation: examining the effects of green transformational leadership and dynamic capabilities. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(6), 1111-1123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2071692
  6. AL‐khatib, A. w., & Ramayah, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence‐based dynamic capabilities and circular supply chain: Analyzing the potential indirect effect of frugal innovation in retailing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 830-848. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4018
  7. Alfaiza, S. A., Hassan, H. B., Riyadh, H. A., Beshr, B. A. H., Taha, T. A., & Zangnaa, M. G. (2025). Navigating dynamic market challenges to enhancing sustainable entrepreneurship in SMEs through opportunities and disadvantages. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00482-z
  8. Alshammari, K. H., & Alshammari, A. F. (2026). From digitalization to knowledge innovation: integrated model of AI knowledge agility and organizational learning culture. Systems, 14(1), 67. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010067
  9. Arofah, B. S., & Harsono, M. (2025). The influence of intellectual capital on innovation performance: the mediating role of knowledge sharing and innovation culture (A Study on startups fostered by UNS). International Journal, 8(01), 116-130. doi:https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v8-i1-12
  10. Ayegba, J. O., & Lin, Z. L. (2020). A review on dynamic capacities in strategic management. International Entrepreneurship Review, 6(1), 47-61. doi:https://doi.org/10.15678/ier.2020.0601.03
  11. Ayoub, H. S., & Sopuru, J. C. (2026). Reconfiguring strategic capabilities in the digital era: How AI-enabled dynamic capability, data-driven culture, and organizational learning shape firm performance. Sustainability, 18(3), 1157. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031157
  12. Babar, S., Yasmeen, A., & Rehman, W. u. (2025). HPWPs, creativity, and innovative performance: moderating role of knowledge sharing. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 63(2), e70002. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70002
  13. Bechtel, J., Kaufmann, C., & Kock, A. (2023). The interplay between dynamic capabilities’ dimensions and their relationship to project portfolio agility and success. International Journal of Project Management, 41(4), 102469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102469
  14. Bekata, A. T., & Kero, C. A. (2025). Managing open innovation: The roles of strategic orientation and dynamic capabilities, evidence from Ethiopian SMEs. Innovation and Development, 15(1), 177-206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2023.2286716
  15. Bornay-Barrachina, M., López-Cabrales, Á., & Salas-Vallina, A. (2025). Sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring dynamic capabilities in innovative firms: Why does strategic leadership make a difference? BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 28(2), 399-420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444231185790
  16. Bux, A., Zhu, Y., & Devi, S. (2025). Enhancing organizational agility through knowledge sharing and open innovation: The role of transformational leadership in digital transformation. Sustainability, 17(15), 6765. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156765
  17. Cabrilo, S., & Dahms, S. (2018). How strategic knowledge management drives intellectual capital to superior innovation and market performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(3), 621-648. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2017-0309
  18. Castaneda, D. I., & Cuellar, S. (2020). Knowledge sharing and innovation: A systematic review. Knowledge and Process Management, 27(3), 159-173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1637
  19. Cavusgil, S. T., & Deligonul, S. Z. (2025). Dynamic capabilities framework and its transformative contributions. Journal of International Business Studies, 56(1), 33-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00758-8
  20. Chaudhuri, R., Chatterjee, S., Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2024). Adoption of robust business analytics for product innovation and organizational performance: the mediating role of organizational data-driven culture. Annals of Operations Research, 339(3), 1757-1791. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04407-3
  21. Chen, S.-H., & Huang, Y.-C. (2024). The effects of ESG management on process innovation: The case of cement industry. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 6(2), 167-179. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v6i2.2031
  22. Chirumalla, K., Leoni, L., & Oghazi, P. (2023). Moving from servitization to digital servitization: Identifying the required dynamic capabilities and related microfoundations to facilitate the transition. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113668. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113668
  23. Corral de Zubielqui, G., Jones, J., Seet, P.-S., & Lindsay, N. (2015). Knowledge transfer between actors in the innovation system: a study of higher education institutions (HEIS) and SMES. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(3), 436-458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2013-0152
  24. Cristache, N., Croitoru, G., & Florea, N. V. (2025). The influence of knowledge management on innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(5), 100793. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100793
  25. Daim, A. A. S. A. (2026). The impact of artificial emotional intelligence in supporting human resource managers' decisions by mediating knowledge sharing behaviors. Advances in Management and Business Studies, 1(3), 169-184. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ambus.v1i3.4131
  26. Damanpour, F. (2010). An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996-1010. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00628.x
  27. Dirisu, J. I., Iyiola, O., & Ibidunni, O. (2013). Product differentiation: A tool of competitive advantage and optimal organizational performance (A study of Unilever Nigeria PLC). European Scientific Journal, 9(34), 258–281.
  28. Dongling, W., Yuming, Z., Xinmin, L., Chen, J., XiaoYi, Z., & Chang, H. (2022). Can inter-organizational knowledge-sharing improve enterprise innovation performance? The mediator effect of innovation capability and the moderator effect of network characteristics. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 856301. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.856301
  29. Dzenopoljac, V., Dzenopoljac, A., Ognjanovic, J., Kraus, S., & Puumalainen, K. (2025). From sharing to shaping: Role of knowledge quality and ambidexterity in SME innovation performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(6), 100838. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100838
  30. El Baz, J., & Ruel, S. (2024). Achieving social performance through digitalization and supply chain resilience in the COVID-19 disruption era: An empirical examination based on a stakeholder dynamic capabilities view. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123209
  31. Falasca, M., Zhang, J., Conchar, M., & Li, L. (2017). The impact of customer knowledge and marketing dynamic capability on innovation performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(7), 901-912. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2016-0289
  32. Farzaneh, M., Ghasemzadeh, P., Nazari, J. A., & Mehralian, G. (2021). Contributory role of dynamic capabilities in the relationship between organizational learning and innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 655-676. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2019-0355
  33. Farzaneh, M., Wilden, R., Afshari, L., & Mehralian, G. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148, 47-59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.030
  34. Fern, Y. S., Ashraf, A., & Batool, S. (2022). The relationship between knowledge sharing and innovation performance: A case of manufacturing sector of the emerging economy. Gomal University Journal of Research, 38(3), 250-259. doi:https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-38-03-01
  35. Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 92, 102061. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.004
  36. Gelhard, C., & Von Delft, S. (2016). The role of organizational capabilities in achieving superior sustainability performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4632-4642. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.053
  37. Genc, E., Dayan, M., & Genc, O. F. (2019). The impact of SME internationalization on innovation: The mediating role of market and entrepreneurial orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 253-264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.008
  38. Gonzalez, R. V. D., & Melo, T. M. (2019). Analyzing dynamic capability in teamwork. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1196-1217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2018-0478
  39. Habibullah, M., & Kamal, A. (2024). Environmental dynamism and strategic performance in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Energy and Environmental Policy Options, 7(3), 35-42.
  40. Hadi, N. U., Raza, M. A., Orole, F., Abdullah, A., & Khan, M. I. (2026). Exnovation as a strategic enabler: Unlocking technological innovation through ambidexterity and capability reconfiguration. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 10(3), 100176 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2026.01.001
  41. Hadjri, M. I., Perizade, B., WK, W. F., Santati, P., & Musdalifah, F. S. (2023). Kapabilitas dinamik, kompetensi sumber daya manusia, dan kinerja inovasi: Studi empiris dalam pengembangan industri halal di Sumatera Selatan selama pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Media Wahana Ekonomika, 20(1), 91-103. doi:https://doi.org/10.31851/jmwe.v20i1.11103
  42. Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
  43. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  44. Ibidunni, A. S., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Tantawy, A. A., & Kolawole, A. I. (2025). Navigating borders, cultivating innovations: the dynamic role of cross-border knowledge transfer in SMEs: AS Ibidunni et al. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 50(3), 1036-1059. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10121-6
  45. Ingram, T., & Kraśnicka, T. (2023). The interplay of dynamic capabilities and innovation output in family and non-family companies: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 63-86. doi:https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2023.110203
  46. Iqbal, S., Bashir, M., Bureš, V., Zanker, M., Ullah, S., & Rizwan, A. (2025). Impact of knowledge sharing and innovation on performance of organization: evidence from the pharmaceutical industry of Pakistan. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2471536. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2471536
  47. Jian, Z.-q., Osman, M. A., & Li, L. (2023). The effects of relationship quality and knowledge sharing on service innovation performance: organisational learning as a mediator. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 22(1), 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJITM.2023.130057
  48. Jiao, H., Alon, I., & Cui, Y. (2011). Environmental dynamism, innovation, and dynamic capabilities: the case of China. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 5(2), 131-144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/17506201111131550
  49. Jie, H., Gooi, L. M., & Lou, Y. (2025). Digital maturity, dynamic capabilities and innovation performance in high-tech SMEs. International Review of Economics & Finance, 99, 103971. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103971
  50. Jordão, R. V. D., Novas, J., & Gupta, V. (2020). The role of knowledge-based networks in the intellectual capital and organizational performance of small and medium-sized enterprises. Kybernetes, 49(1), 116-140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2019-0301
  51. José Ruiz‐Ortega, M., Parra‐Requena, G., Rodrigo‐Alarcón, J., & García‐Villaverde, P. M. (2013). Environmental dynamism and entrepreneurial orientation: The moderating role of firm's capabilities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(3), 475-493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811311328542
  52. Kalathingal, S., & Ambrammal, S. K. (2025). Innovation capabilities and sustainability in MSMEs. An analysis of empirical studies. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 14657503241307141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503241307141
  53. Kamil, I., Reztrianti, D., Setiawan, A. R., Shafirendita, G., & Al-Firdauz, M. M. (2026). Optimizing AI Chatbot Adoption for MSME Competitiveness. Jambura Science of Management, 8(1), 15-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.37479/jsm.v8i1.34102
  54. Kan, H., Li, Y., & Li, X. (2025). The Influence Mechanism of Organizational Context and Tacit Knowledge Sharing on Innovation Performance in Mega Projects. Buildings, 15(17), 3237. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173237
  55. Kero, C. A., & Bogale, A. T. (2023). A Systematic Review of Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capabilities of Firms and Future Research Avenues. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 18(10), 3137–3154. doi:https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.181016
  56. Khan, A., & Tao, M. (2022). Knowledge absorption capacity's efficacy to enhance innovation performance through big data analytics and digital platform capability. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(3), 100201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100201
  57. Kim, K., Seo, E.-H., & Kim, C. Y. (2025). The relationships between environmental dynamism, absorptive capacity, organizational ambidexterity, and innovation performance from the dynamic capabilities perspective. Sustainability, 17(2), 449. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020449
  58. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (ijec), 11(4), 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  59. Kowshik, S. T. H., Chew, E. Y., & Lee, S. W. H. (2025). Knowledge transfer as a dynamic capability: a meta-analysis of its impact on organizational outcomes in international contexts. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2025.2519291
  60. Krisprimandoyo, D. A., Anshori, M. Y., Ahmad, J., Sufa, S. A., & Brumadyadisty, G. (2025). Enhancing innovation through knowledge sharing and quality leader–member relationships. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 13(3), 1421-1432. doi:https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i3.3311
  61. Kumar, J., Rani, V., Rani, M., & Rani, G. (2025). Nexus between intellectual capital and innovation performance: the mediating role of firm’s attractiveness and knowledge sharing. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 55(5), 1349-1366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-06-2023-0145
  62. Larios-Francia, R. P., & Ferasso, M. (2023). The relationship between innovation and performance in MSMEs: The case of the wearing apparel sector in emerging countries. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 100018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100018
  63. Le, P. B., & Vu, K. D. (2025). Knowledge sharing mediates relationship between collaborative culture and innovation performance: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 19(1), 272-288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-11-2023-0460
  64. Li, K., Cai, Y., Pei, Y., & Yuan, C. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence adoption on firms' innovation performance in the digital era: based on dynamic capabilities theory. International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 228–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.70693/itphss.v2i3.343
  65. Li, Q., & Gao, H. (2023). How external knowledge acquisition contribute to innovation performance: a chain mediation model. Sage Open, 13(4), 21582440231219203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231219203
  66. Li, Y., Song, Y., Wang, J., & Li, C. (2019). Intellectual capital, knowledge sharing, and innovation performance: evidence from the Chinese construction industry. Sustainability, 11(9), 2713. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092713
  67. Lin, X., & Wu, D. (2025). AI technology adoption, knowledge sharing, and manufacturing firms' innovation performance: The moderating effect of absorptive capacity. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 72, 2137–2149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2025.3573176
  68. Mandung, F., Sahari, S., & Amra, W. (2025). Understanding how companies utilize technological innovation for competitive advantage: a qualitative inquiry. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(1), 144-154. doi:https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i1.1069
  69. Mehralian, G., Sheikhi, S., Zatzick, C., & Babapour, J. (2023). The dynamic capability view in exploring the relationship between high-performance work systems and innovation performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(18), 3555-3584. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2138494
  70. Memon, M. A., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., & Cheah, J.-h. (2025). Purposive Sampling: A Review And Guidelines For Quantitative Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 1-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.9(1)01
  71. Mousavi, S., Bossink, B., & van Vliet, M. (2018). Dynamic capabilities and organizational routines for managing innovation towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 224-239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.215
  72. Mukhtar, M. A., Nasreen, F., & Khalid, W. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and firm performance: Moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(4), 597-601. doi:https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00180
  73. Najafi-Tavani, S., Najafi-Tavani, Z., Naudé, P., Oghazi, P., & Zeynaloo, E. (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 193-205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.009
  74. Nnanna-Ohuonu, O., Chikwesiri, N. P., Okudo, A., & Chinwe, I. V. (2026). Artificial intelligence personalized marketing content and consumer behavior in Nigerian SMEs. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 7(3), 325-339. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v7i3.3418
  75. O’Cass, A., & Sok, P. (2014). The role of intellectual resources, product innovation capability, reputational resources and marketing capability combinations in firm growth. International Small Business Journal, 32(8), 996-1018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613480225
  76. Odai, L. A., Xiao, Y., Korankye, B., & Ahakwa, I. (2025). Navigating digital transformation: The critical role of knowledge sharing and digital transformational leadership in boosting innovation capability in Sub-Saharan Africa. Business Process Management Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2025-0120
  77. Oliva, F. L., Couto, M. H. G., Santos, R. F., & Bresciani, S. (2019). The integration between knowledge management and dynamic capabilities in agile organizations. Management Decision, 57(8), 1960-1979. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2018-0670
  78. Paovangsa, S., Kamil, M., Silisak, D., & Xing, K. (2025). Technological innovation capabilities' effect on innovation performance: Agriculture firms in Laos. Sustainable Futures, 10, 100845. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100845
  79. Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239-273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x
  80. Pham, T. N., Pham, K. L. N., & Tan, A. W. K. (2025). Impact of firm dynamic capabilities on fresh agri-supply chain performance: The moderating role of supply chain uncertainty. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), 18(1), 1-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/ijisscm.383298
  81. Prasanna, Jayasundara, Naradda Gamage, S. K., Ekanayake, Rajapakshe, & Abeyrathne. (2019). Sustainability of SMEs in the competition: A systemic review on technological challenges and SME performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(4), 100. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5040100
  82. Prester, J. (2023). Operating and dynamic capabilities and their impact on operating and business performance. Sustainability, 15(20), 15181. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015181
  83. Qi, Y., Chen, Q., Yang, M., & Sun, Y. (2024). Ambidextrous knowledge accumulation, dynamic capability and manufacturing digital transformation in China. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(8), 2275-2305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2022-0717
  84. Qiu, X., Holmen, E., Havenvid, M., De Boer, L., & Hermundsdottir, F. (2022). Open for business: Towards an interactive view on dynamic capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 107, 148-160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.09.027
  85. Quayson, M., Bai, C., Sun, L., & Sarkis, J. (2023). Building blockchain‐driven dynamic capabilities for developing circular supply chain: Rethinking the role of sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4821-4840. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3395
  86. Rajala, A., & Hautala-Kankaanpää, T. (2023). Exploring the effects of SMEs’ platform-based digital connectivity on firm performance–the moderating role of environmental turbulence. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(13), 15-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2022-0024
  87. Rhaiem, K., & Doloreux, D. (2024). Inbound open innovation in SMEs: A microfoundations perspective of dynamic capabilities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, 123048. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123048
  88. Robertson, J., Caruana, A., & Ferreira, C. (2023). Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems. International Business Review, 32(2), 101866. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101866
  89. Rodrigues, M., Alves, M. d. C., Oliveira, C., Vale, J., & Silva, R. (2021). The impact of strategy, environment, and the management system on the foreign subsidiary: The implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 51. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010051
  90. Saeedikiya, M., Salunke, S., & Kowalkiewicz, M. (2024). Toward a dynamic capability perspective of digital transformation in SMEs: A study of the mobility sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 439, 140718. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140718
  91. Sarfo, C., Fakhar Manesh, M., & Caputo, A. (2025). Exploitative and exploratory search: dynamic capabilities enhancing SME adaptation, new product development, and environmental performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 63(5), 1978-2007. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2024.2418026
  92. Sarwar, Z., Gao, J., & Khan, A. (2024). Nexus of digital platforms, innovation capability, and strategic alignment to enhance innovation performance in the Asia Pacific region: A dynamic capability perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 867-901. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09879-4
  93. Saunila, M. (2020). Innovation capability in SMEs: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 260-265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.11.002
  94. Schneckenberg, D., Truong, Y., & Mazloomi, H. (2015). Microfoundations of innovative capabilities: The leverage of collaborative technologies on organizational learning and knowledge management in a multinational corporation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 100, 356-368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.008
  95. Setiawan, B., Pamungkas, B., Mekaniwati, A., & Kusuma, P. M. (2025). The strategic role of digital transformation, dynamic and agile capabilities for the performance of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). The Bottom Line. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-08-2024-0120
  96. Setiyarini, E. Y., Rosdyanti, T., & Sari, M. Y. P. (2026). Socio-economic improvement of MSMEs through digital transformation in Metro City. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 7(2), 259-272. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v7i2.5657
  97. Shi, Y., Liu, Y.-x., Fong, V. H. I., & Lan, Y. (2025). Fueling SMEs’ product innovation through entrepreneurial passion during COVID-19: the role of dynamic capability and environmental opportunities. Journal of Management & Organization, 31(2), 967-987. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2023.66
  98. Siddiqui, F., Anwer, N., Sherwani, A. N. K., Chaudhry, S., & Batool, F. (2024). Role of knowledge sharing in enhancing innovative performance through high-performance work systems. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 13(4), 483-496. doi:https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.4.40
  99. Sumantri, B. A., Suliyanto, S., & Darmawati, D. (2023). Village unit cooperatives on dynamic capability and creative capability adaptation to innovation performance: The role of competitive advantage. Qubahan Academic Journal, 3(4), 245-261. doi:https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v3n4a178
  100. Sun, K., Ooi, K.-B., Wei-Han Tan, G., & Lee, V.-H. (2025). Small and medium-sized enterprises’ path to sustainable supply chains: Exploring the role of supply chain finance and risk management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 30(1), 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2023-0437
  101. Supriyadi, F. (2026). Dynamic Capability Drives Digital Transformation: SEM Evidence on Sustained Competitive Advantage in Emerging Markets. Matrik: Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika, Dan Rekayasa Komputer, 25(2), 385–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.30812/matrik.v25i2.6128
  102. Talaei-Khoei, A., Yang, A. T., & Masialeti, M. (2024). How does incorporating ChatGPT within a firm reinforce agility-mediated performance? The moderating role of innovation infusion and firms’ ethical identity. Technovation, 132, 102975. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102975
  103. Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
  104. Teece, D. J. (2016). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 224-273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.54
  105. Torabi, H., Maalmir, A., & Ahmadi, H. (2025). Challenges and solutions for implementing knowledge management in knowledge-based companies supply chains. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 7(1), 97-109. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v7i1.2600
  106. Tran, T. N., Tam, N. T. T., & Tu, K. M. (2026). The mediating role of knowledge sharing behavior and the moderating role of digital mindset: Evidence in Vietnam. PLoS One, 21(3), e0342798. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342798
  107. Uyanik, C., & Koç, T. (2025). Does adopting Industry 4.0 design principles lead to innovation performance? Moderated mediation effects of dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(4), 100660. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100660
  108. Wang, C., & Hu, Q. (2020). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation, 94, 102010. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.002
  109. Wang, C., & Thai, M. T. T. (2026). Beyond digital anxiety: leveraging digital platform capability and entrepreneurial orientation for SME digital business model innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 15, 100975. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2026.100975
  110. Wang, G., Niu, Y., Mansor, Z. D., Leong, Y. C., & Yan, Z. (2024). Unlocking digital potential: Exploring the drivers of employee dynamic capability on employee digital performance in Chinese SMEs-moderation effect of competitive climate. Heliyon, 10(4), e25583. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25583
  111. Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899-8908. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.017
  112. Wu, H., Chen, J., & Jiao, H. (2016). Dynamic capabilities as a mediator linking international diversification and innovation performance of firms in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2678-2686. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.003
  113. Wu, Q., Yan, D., & Umair, M. (2023). Assessing the role of competitive intelligence and practices of dynamic capabilities in business accommodation of SMEs. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77, 1103-1114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.11.024
  114. Yan, K., Xia, E., Li, J., & Huang, J. (2023). Assessing the effect of business intelligence quality on enterprise innovation performance: a knowledge dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Technology Management, 92(1), 112-138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2023.128798
  115. Yoon, W., & Kwon, S. (2023). The impact of technological and non-technological innovative activities on technological competitiveness. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(1), 1-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00868-w
  116. Zhang, H., Zhu, L., Zhang, A., & Shohruh, K. (2026). The influence of generative artificial intelligence usage on employees’ innovative job performance. PLoS One, 21(1), e0327786. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327786
  117. Zhao, S., Jiang, Y., Peng, X., & Hong, J. (2021). Knowledge sharing direction and innovation performance in organizations: do absorptive capacity and individual creativity matter? European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 371-394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2019-0244
  118. Zhou, S. S., Zhou, A. J., Feng, J., & Jiang, S. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(5), 731-747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.20
  119. Zhou, Y., Chen, J., & Cheng, B. (2024). Platform incentives, user engagement and knowledge collaboration performance in online knowledge community: a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(10), 2940-2975. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2023-0021
  120. Zhou, Y., Hong, J., Zhu, K., Yang, Y., & Zhao, D. (2018). Dynamic capability matters: Uncovering its fundamental role in decision making of environmental innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 516-526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.208

Author Biography

Hardani Widhiastuti Universitas Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

 

 

Authors

1 Yuli Budiati
Universitas Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
2 Hardani Widhiastuti
Universitas Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
3 Indarto Indarto
Universitas Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
4 Rohmini Indah Lestari
Universitas Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

View PDF

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): August
Section: Articles
WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email