Directive Speech Acts of Teacher and Students in Online Teaching Learning Interactions at SMP Ignatius Global School Palembang

https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v3i2.1321
Published: Feb 7, 2023

Abstract:

Purpose: This research aimed to discuss the form and function of the directive speech acts of teacher and students in online teaching and learning interactions at SMP Ignatius Global School (IGS) Palembang.

Methodology: The method used was descriptive qualitative, and the data source contained directive speech acts of teacher and students in online teaching at SMP IGS.

Results: Based on the results, there were forms and functions of teacher and students’ directive speech acts. Furthermore, transactions were found in the discourse of classroom interactions. The forms of teacher directive speech acts in online teaching and learning interactions were requertives, questions, requirements, prohibitives, permissive, and advisories. Meanwhile, the forms of students’ directive speech acts are requertives, questions, and advisories.

Limitations: This research is limited to discussing only the directive speech acts of teacher and students in teaching and learning interactions.

Contribution: This research can contribute to the interaction of students and teacher regarding the directive speech acts in online teaching and learning interactions.

Keywords:
1. Speech acts
2. directive speech acts
Authors:
1 . Ayu Meidini
Student of Master Language Education, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia
2 . Didi Suhendi
Lecturer of Indonesian Language Education, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia
3 . Izzah Izzah
Lecturer of Indonesian Language Education, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia
View PDF
How to Cite
Meidini, A., Suhendi, D., & Izzah, I. (2023). Directive Speech Acts of Teacher and Students in Online Teaching Learning Interactions at SMP Ignatius Global School Palembang. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 3(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v3i2.1321
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): February
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

    adnan, M. Z. (2005). Kajian wacana : teori, metode [dan] aplikasi prinsip-prinsip analisis wacana Yogyakarta : Tiara Wacana.

    Amiri, Y., Khademi, N., Khafri, F. Z., Akbari, Z., & Jangjoo, R. (2022). The Impact of Corona Outbreak on Virtual Education Policy in Iranian Universities. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 3(1), 1-15.

    Ardianto, A. (2013). Tindak tutur direktif guru dalam wacana interaksi kelas anak tunarungu. LITERA, 12(1).

    Farooqi, M. Q. (2022). Teaching and Learning of English as a Foreign Language: The Impact of COVID-19. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2(4), 357-366.

    Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., . . . Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif & kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: CV Pustaka Ilmu.

    Hossain, M. A., & Yasmin, F. (2022). Emergency Online Teaching-Learning Model in the Context of Higher-Level Education due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2(4), 327-341.

    Ibrahim, A. S. (1993). Kajian Tindak Tutur: Usaha Nasional.

    Mahsun, M. (1991). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Raja Gra?ndo Persada.

    Mujianto, G. (2015). Tindak tutur guru dalam pembelajaran menulis dengan komposisi terarah berdasarkan tingkat kognisi siswa. Kembara: Jurnal Keilmuan bahasa, sastra, dan pengajarannya, 1(2), 173-197.

    Mulyani, M. Model Integrasi Tindak Tutur Direktif Dalam Penerapan Pendidikan Ahklaq Mulia dan Karakter Bangsa Bagi Pelajar di SMA. Model Integrasi Tindak Tutur Direktif Dalam Penerapan Pendidikan Ahklaq Mulia dan Karakter Bangsa Bagi Pelajar di SMA.

    Nababan, M. L. E. (2012). Kesantunan verbal dan nonverbal pada tuturan direktif dalam pembelajaran di smp taman rama national plus jimbaran. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia, 1(1).

    Nadila, S. M. (2021). Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh: Kegagalan Pemaknaan Simbol dalam Proses Belajar.

    Peraturan pemerintah republik indonesia nomor 21 tahun 2020 tentang pembatasan sosial berskala besar dalam rangka percepatan penanganan corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19), (2020).

    Prasetyo, R. (2018). Tindak Tutur Direktif Pendidik dalam Mengelola Interaksi Belajar Mengajar di SMA Negeri 1 Wirosari Grobogan: Kajian Analisis Wacana Kelas. Universitas Negeri Semarang. Universitas Negeri Semarang. http://lib. unnes. ac. id/40546/1/tesis% 20full. pdf.

    Pujiati, T. (2021). Menyajikan Data Bahasa dalam Penelitian Pragmatik. Paper presented at the Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sasindo.

    Sari, R. I. (2017). Bentuk Tuturan Direktif Pada Guru Dalam Situasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas X MAN Malang 1. Kembara, 3(1), 79-97.

    Suhartono. (2020). Pragmatik Konteks Indonesia.

    Sulistio, E. B., & Hutagalung, S. (2022). Higher Education Policy Model During The Pandemic: Lesson Learned From University Students. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education (JSHE), 3(1), 77-87.

    Sulistyo, E. T. (2013). Pragmatik Suatu Kajian Awal: Instutional Repository.

    Undang-undang republik indonesia nomor 6 tahun 2018 tentang kekarantinaan kesehatan, (2018).

    Wijana, I. D. P., & Rohmadi, M. (2010). Analisis wacana pragmatik: Kajian teori dan analisis: Yuma Pustaka.

    Yuliantoro, A. (2020). Analisis Pragmatik: Unwidha Press.

    Yusuf, A. O., Olajide-Yusuf, M. A., & Olajide, M. F. (2022). Corona Virus (COVID-19) Pandemic Knowledge, Perceptions and Practices among Nigerian Academic Communities. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2(4), 295-309.

  1. adnan, M. Z. (2005). Kajian wacana : teori, metode [dan] aplikasi prinsip-prinsip analisis wacana Yogyakarta : Tiara Wacana.
  2. Amiri, Y., Khademi, N., Khafri, F. Z., Akbari, Z., & Jangjoo, R. (2022). The Impact of Corona Outbreak on Virtual Education Policy in Iranian Universities. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 3(1), 1-15.
  3. Ardianto, A. (2013). Tindak tutur direktif guru dalam wacana interaksi kelas anak tunarungu. LITERA, 12(1).
  4. Farooqi, M. Q. (2022). Teaching and Learning of English as a Foreign Language: The Impact of COVID-19. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2(4), 357-366.
  5. Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., . . . Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif & kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: CV Pustaka Ilmu.
  6. Hossain, M. A., & Yasmin, F. (2022). Emergency Online Teaching-Learning Model in the Context of Higher-Level Education due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2(4), 327-341.
  7. Ibrahim, A. S. (1993). Kajian Tindak Tutur: Usaha Nasional.
  8. Mahsun, M. (1991). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Raja Gra?ndo Persada.
  9. Mujianto, G. (2015). Tindak tutur guru dalam pembelajaran menulis dengan komposisi terarah berdasarkan tingkat kognisi siswa. Kembara: Jurnal Keilmuan bahasa, sastra, dan pengajarannya, 1(2), 173-197.
  10. Mulyani, M. Model Integrasi Tindak Tutur Direktif Dalam Penerapan Pendidikan Ahklaq Mulia dan Karakter Bangsa Bagi Pelajar di SMA. Model Integrasi Tindak Tutur Direktif Dalam Penerapan Pendidikan Ahklaq Mulia dan Karakter Bangsa Bagi Pelajar di SMA.
  11. Nababan, M. L. E. (2012). Kesantunan verbal dan nonverbal pada tuturan direktif dalam pembelajaran di smp taman rama national plus jimbaran. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia, 1(1).
  12. Nadila, S. M. (2021). Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh: Kegagalan Pemaknaan Simbol dalam Proses Belajar.
  13. Peraturan pemerintah republik indonesia nomor 21 tahun 2020 tentang pembatasan sosial berskala besar dalam rangka percepatan penanganan corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19), (2020).
  14. Prasetyo, R. (2018). Tindak Tutur Direktif Pendidik dalam Mengelola Interaksi Belajar Mengajar di SMA Negeri 1 Wirosari Grobogan: Kajian Analisis Wacana Kelas. Universitas Negeri Semarang. Universitas Negeri Semarang. http://lib. unnes. ac. id/40546/1/tesis% 20full. pdf.
  15. Pujiati, T. (2021). Menyajikan Data Bahasa dalam Penelitian Pragmatik. Paper presented at the Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sasindo.
  16. Sari, R. I. (2017). Bentuk Tuturan Direktif Pada Guru Dalam Situasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas X MAN Malang 1. Kembara, 3(1), 79-97.
  17. Suhartono. (2020). Pragmatik Konteks Indonesia.
  18. Sulistio, E. B., & Hutagalung, S. (2022). Higher Education Policy Model During The Pandemic: Lesson Learned From University Students. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education (JSHE), 3(1), 77-87.
  19. Sulistyo, E. T. (2013). Pragmatik Suatu Kajian Awal: Instutional Repository.
  20. Undang-undang republik indonesia nomor 6 tahun 2018 tentang kekarantinaan kesehatan, (2018).
  21. Wijana, I. D. P., & Rohmadi, M. (2010). Analisis wacana pragmatik: Kajian teori dan analisis: Yuma Pustaka.
  22. Yuliantoro, A. (2020). Analisis Pragmatik: Unwidha Press.
  23. Yusuf, A. O., Olajide-Yusuf, M. A., & Olajide, M. F. (2022). Corona Virus (COVID-19) Pandemic Knowledge, Perceptions and Practices among Nigerian Academic Communities. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2(4), 295-309.