UTLJ

Article Details

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): March

A Comparative Study of Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Technology Tools in Developing Oral Communication Skills

https://doi.org/10.35912/utlj.v2i1.3925

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores how synchronous and asynchronous tools contribute to the development of oral communication skills by investigating their impact on fluency, interpersonal understanding, anxiety reduction, and repeated practice.

Research Methodology: A mixed-methods approach was used, combining quantitative data from surveys and performance assessments with qualitative insights from interviews, classroom observations and student reflections.

Results: Synchronous tools such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams enhanced students' fluency, spontaneity, and interaction skills. In contrast, asynchronous tools, such as Flipgrid and online discussion boards, offered a reflective space that reduced anxiety, allowing for thoughtful and precise contributions.

Conclusions: This study emphasizes the importance of hybrid learning methods that combine the strengths of both synchronous and asynchronous approaches to foster confident and accurate communication skills.

Limitations: This study was limited to undergraduate students and focused on specific tools, potentially limiting its generalizability to other contexts or educational levels.

Contributions: This research highlights the complementary role of synchronous and asynchronous tools in developing oral communication skills, advocating hybrid pedagogies in digital learning environments.

Keywords

Asynchronous Learning Educational Technology Hybrid Pedagogy Oral Communication Synchronous Learning

How to Cite

Mundia, M. . (2026). A Comparative Study of Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Technology Tools in Developing Oral Communication Skills. Universal Teaching and Learning Journal, 2(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.35912/utlj.v2i1.3925

References

  1. Abdujalilova, M. (2025). Linguistic study of household vocabulary in Englishand Uzbeklanguages. Journal of Indigenous Culture, Tourism, and Language (JICTL), 1(2), 75-86. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jictl.v1i2.3428
  2. Abdullaev, Z. K., & Visola, I. (2021). Developing Uzbek Student-Teachers' Proficiency in Speaking English at the University Level. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(7), 13911-13925.
  3. Amiti, F. (2020). Synchronous and asynchronous E-learning. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 5(2), 60-70. doi:https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3313
  4. Avgousti, M. I. (2018). Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 819-853. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1455713
  5. Diana, A., Kholida, B., & Nargiza, A. (2023). Integration of information and communication technologies in online teaching of academic English in higher education in Uzbekistan. ??????????? ???????? ??????? ???????????(13), 66-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.36078/1687761685
  6. Gashi, A., Zhushi, G., & Krasniqi, B. (2024). Exploring determinants of student satisfaction with synchronous e-learning: evidence during COVID-19. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(1), 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-05-2022-0118
  7. Hung, S.-T. A. (2016). Enhancing feedback provision through multimodal video technology. Computers & Education, 98, 90-101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.009
  8. Jaramillo, N. (2022). Leveraging asynchronous speaking tasks to promote willingness and confidence to speak in Spanish: A qualitative study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 1-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6657
  9. Jin, W., Sun, Y., Wang, N., & Zhang, X. (2017). Why users purchase virtual products in MMORPG? An integrative perspective of social presence and user engagement. Internet research, 27(2), 408-427. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-04-2016-0091
  10. Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2022). Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53(1), 296-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235
  11. Kuliahana, A. (2022). Teaching of speaking using asynchronous e-learning applications. Datokarama English Education Journal, 3(1), 34-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.24239/dee.v1i1.48
  12. Ledford, V., Wang, X., Anderson, L. B., Leach, J., Lucas, M., & Mazzone, R. (2023). Communication apprehension in the online presentational speaking course: Considerations for synchronous course meetings and asynchronous presentations. Communication Teacher, 37(1), 64-82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2022.2046284
  13. Lee, J. S., & Hsieh, J. C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63-73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.002
  14. Ling, C. W., & Luan, N. L. (2024). The roles of teaching presence in asynchronous and synchronous online teaching contexts. The English Teacher, 53(1), 33-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.52696/wynd5473
  15. Maghdalena, A. H., Faridi, A., & Hartono, R. (2022). The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous e-learning environments in teaching writing to different personalities. English Education Journal, 12(3), 333-346. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i3.57801
  16. Mahdi, D. A. (2022). Improving speaking and presentation skills through interactive multimedia environment for non-native speakers of English. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079811
  17. Marcum, J., & Kim, Y. (2020). Oral language proficiency in distance English-language learning. Calico Journal, 37(2), 148-168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.37788
  18. Meng, B. C., & Saad, N. H. M. (2025). Factors influencing the Oral Output of Foreign Language Learners: A case study in Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(26), 8602-8610. doi:https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0649
  19. Nasibaliev, A., & Abdullayeva, M. (2025). The development of IT education in Uzbekistan. European Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(6), 24-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.59324/ejaset.2025.3(6).03
  20. Nazki, S. H. (2025). Despair, desire, and dissent: Theatrical contributions of Sarah Kane and Mark Ravenhill. Journal of Indigenous Culture, Tourism, and Language (JICTL), 1(1), 45-60. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jictl.v1i1.2829
  21. Öztürk, E. Ö., & Öztürk, G. (2021). Reducing speaking anxiety in EFL classrooms: An explanatory mixed-methods study. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras(36), 249-261. doi:https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi36.18018
  22. Pakpahan, E. M., & Gultom, I. (2020). Foreign language speaking anxiety in online learning. J-ELLiT (Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching), 4(2), 47-51. doi:https://doi.org/10.17977/um046v4i22020p47-51
  23. Pinandhita, F. (2025). Integrating Digital Tools and Learning Strategies to Enhance Speaking Proficiency: Evidence from a Mixed-Methods Study in Indonesian EFL Universities. EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 1003-1014. doi:https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i2.1674
  24. Putri, N. R., Padmadewi, N. N., & Budiarta, L. G. R. (2022). Flipgrid: Video-based applications to improve English ability for junior high school students. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 9(2), 170-182. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v9i2.47095
  25. Rahmani, E. F., Riyanti, D., Misieng, J., & Sayok, A. K. (2024). A review on Synchronous, Asynchronous, and Blended Learning on ELT in Indonesian Context. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 11(1), 223-260. doi:https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v11i1.2326
  26. Reinhardt, J. (2019). Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis, and social networking. Language Teaching, 52(1), 1-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000356
  27. Riwayatiningsih, R., & Sulistyani, S. (2020). The implementation of synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning in EFL setting: A case study. Jurnal Basis, 7(2), 309-318. doi:https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v7i2.2484
  28. Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning: A new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational psychology review, 34(1), 171-196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7
  29. Song, J., & Lee, J. (2025). Presence and motivation: Comparing synchronous and asynchronous learning environments for foreign language learners using path analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 30(5), 6061-6090. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-024-13047-6
  30. Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of information technology education: Research, 15, 157-190. doi:https://doi.org/10.28945/3502
  31. Sutrisno, E., Siswanto, D., Rahmawati, A., Rusdiyana, E., & Utama, J. Y. (2025). Study on the utilization of village funds to support food security in Glagah Lamongan District, East Java. Journal of Indigenous Culture, Tourism, and Language(JiCTL), 1(1), 15-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jictl.v1i1.1734
  32. Takase, N. (2024). Synchronous and asynchronous online communication for developing foreign language speaking skills. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 15(2), 60-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.241525
  33. Thomas, M. A., Sandhu, R. K., Oliveira, A., & Oliveira, T. (2023). Investigating the effect of media synchronicity in professional use of video conferencing applications. Internet research, 33(6), 2131-2171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2021-0887
  34. Wu, X., He, Z., Li, M., Han, Z., & Huang, C. (2022). Identifying learners’ interaction patterns in an online learning community. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2245. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042245
  35. Zeinali Nejad, M., Golshan, M., & Naeimi, A. (2021). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on learners’ pronunciation achievement. Cogent Psychology, 8(1), 1872908. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1872908
Contact Us
WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email