Article Details
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): March
A Comparative Study of Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Technology Tools in Developing Oral Communication Skills
Abstract
Purpose: This study explores how synchronous and asynchronous tools contribute to the development of oral communication skills by investigating their impact on fluency, interpersonal understanding, anxiety reduction, and repeated practice.
Research Methodology: A mixed-methods approach was used, combining quantitative data from surveys and performance assessments with qualitative insights from interviews, classroom observations and student reflections.
Results: Synchronous tools such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams enhanced students' fluency, spontaneity, and interaction skills. In contrast, asynchronous tools, such as Flipgrid and online discussion boards, offered a reflective space that reduced anxiety, allowing for thoughtful and precise contributions.
Conclusions: This study emphasizes the importance of hybrid learning methods that combine the strengths of both synchronous and asynchronous approaches to foster confident and accurate communication skills.
Limitations: This study was limited to undergraduate students and focused on specific tools, potentially limiting its generalizability to other contexts or educational levels.
Contributions: This research highlights the complementary role of synchronous and asynchronous tools in developing oral communication skills, advocating hybrid pedagogies in digital learning environments.
Keywords
How to Cite
Download Citation
References
- Abdujalilova, M. (2025). Linguistic study of household vocabulary in Englishand Uzbeklanguages. Journal of Indigenous Culture, Tourism, and Language (JICTL), 1(2), 75-86. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jictl.v1i2.3428
- Abdullaev, Z. K., & Visola, I. (2021). Developing Uzbek Student-Teachers' Proficiency in Speaking English at the University Level. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(7), 13911-13925.
- Amiti, F. (2020). Synchronous and asynchronous E-learning. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 5(2), 60-70. doi:https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3313
- Avgousti, M. I. (2018). Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 819-853. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1455713
- Diana, A., Kholida, B., & Nargiza, A. (2023). Integration of information and communication technologies in online teaching of academic English in higher education in Uzbekistan. ??????????? ???????? ??????? ???????????(13), 66-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.36078/1687761685
- Gashi, A., Zhushi, G., & Krasniqi, B. (2024). Exploring determinants of student satisfaction with synchronous e-learning: evidence during COVID-19. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(1), 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-05-2022-0118
- Hung, S.-T. A. (2016). Enhancing feedback provision through multimodal video technology. Computers & Education, 98, 90-101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.009
- Jaramillo, N. (2022). Leveraging asynchronous speaking tasks to promote willingness and confidence to speak in Spanish: A qualitative study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 1-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6657
- Jin, W., Sun, Y., Wang, N., & Zhang, X. (2017). Why users purchase virtual products in MMORPG? An integrative perspective of social presence and user engagement. Internet research, 27(2), 408-427. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-04-2016-0091
- Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2022). Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53(1), 296-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235
- Kuliahana, A. (2022). Teaching of speaking using asynchronous e-learning applications. Datokarama English Education Journal, 3(1), 34-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.24239/dee.v1i1.48
- Ledford, V., Wang, X., Anderson, L. B., Leach, J., Lucas, M., & Mazzone, R. (2023). Communication apprehension in the online presentational speaking course: Considerations for synchronous course meetings and asynchronous presentations. Communication Teacher, 37(1), 64-82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2022.2046284
- Lee, J. S., & Hsieh, J. C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63-73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.002
- Ling, C. W., & Luan, N. L. (2024). The roles of teaching presence in asynchronous and synchronous online teaching contexts. The English Teacher, 53(1), 33-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.52696/wynd5473
- Maghdalena, A. H., Faridi, A., & Hartono, R. (2022). The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous e-learning environments in teaching writing to different personalities. English Education Journal, 12(3), 333-346. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i3.57801
- Mahdi, D. A. (2022). Improving speaking and presentation skills through interactive multimedia environment for non-native speakers of English. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079811
- Marcum, J., & Kim, Y. (2020). Oral language proficiency in distance English-language learning. Calico Journal, 37(2), 148-168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.37788
- Meng, B. C., & Saad, N. H. M. (2025). Factors influencing the Oral Output of Foreign Language Learners: A case study in Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(26), 8602-8610. doi:https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0649
- Nasibaliev, A., & Abdullayeva, M. (2025). The development of IT education in Uzbekistan. European Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(6), 24-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.59324/ejaset.2025.3(6).03
- Nazki, S. H. (2025). Despair, desire, and dissent: Theatrical contributions of Sarah Kane and Mark Ravenhill. Journal of Indigenous Culture, Tourism, and Language (JICTL), 1(1), 45-60. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jictl.v1i1.2829
- Öztürk, E. Ö., & Öztürk, G. (2021). Reducing speaking anxiety in EFL classrooms: An explanatory mixed-methods study. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras(36), 249-261. doi:https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi36.18018
- Pakpahan, E. M., & Gultom, I. (2020). Foreign language speaking anxiety in online learning. J-ELLiT (Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching), 4(2), 47-51. doi:https://doi.org/10.17977/um046v4i22020p47-51
- Pinandhita, F. (2025). Integrating Digital Tools and Learning Strategies to Enhance Speaking Proficiency: Evidence from a Mixed-Methods Study in Indonesian EFL Universities. EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 1003-1014. doi:https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i2.1674
- Putri, N. R., Padmadewi, N. N., & Budiarta, L. G. R. (2022). Flipgrid: Video-based applications to improve English ability for junior high school students. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 9(2), 170-182. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v9i2.47095
- Rahmani, E. F., Riyanti, D., Misieng, J., & Sayok, A. K. (2024). A review on Synchronous, Asynchronous, and Blended Learning on ELT in Indonesian Context. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 11(1), 223-260. doi:https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v11i1.2326
- Reinhardt, J. (2019). Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis, and social networking. Language Teaching, 52(1), 1-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000356
- Riwayatiningsih, R., & Sulistyani, S. (2020). The implementation of synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning in EFL setting: A case study. Jurnal Basis, 7(2), 309-318. doi:https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v7i2.2484
- Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning: A new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational psychology review, 34(1), 171-196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7
- Song, J., & Lee, J. (2025). Presence and motivation: Comparing synchronous and asynchronous learning environments for foreign language learners using path analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 30(5), 6061-6090. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-024-13047-6
- Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of information technology education: Research, 15, 157-190. doi:https://doi.org/10.28945/3502
- Sutrisno, E., Siswanto, D., Rahmawati, A., Rusdiyana, E., & Utama, J. Y. (2025). Study on the utilization of village funds to support food security in Glagah Lamongan District, East Java. Journal of Indigenous Culture, Tourism, and Language(JiCTL), 1(1), 15-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jictl.v1i1.1734
- Takase, N. (2024). Synchronous and asynchronous online communication for developing foreign language speaking skills. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 15(2), 60-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.241525
- Thomas, M. A., Sandhu, R. K., Oliveira, A., & Oliveira, T. (2023). Investigating the effect of media synchronicity in professional use of video conferencing applications. Internet research, 33(6), 2131-2171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2021-0887
- Wu, X., He, Z., Li, M., Han, Z., & Huang, C. (2022). Identifying learners’ interaction patterns in an online learning community. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2245. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042245
- Zeinali Nejad, M., Golshan, M., & Naeimi, A. (2021). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on learners’ pronunciation achievement. Cogent Psychology, 8(1), 1872908. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1872908
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.