UTLJ

Article Details

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): September

The Effectiveness of E-Learning in Iraqi Universities during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Selected Iraqi Universities and Institutes

https://doi.org/10.35912/utlj.v2i2.4308
29 Jun 2026

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of e learning as implemented in Iraqi universities, colleges, and institutes during the academic year 2019/2020, with a particular focus on the challenges and outcomes arising from the COVID-19 pandemic
context. The study evaluates how emergency remote instruction reshaped educational delivery in a country with pre-existing infrastructural deficiencies.

Methodology: A descriptive-analytic research design was memployed. A structured online questionnaire was administered to  6,579 participants drawn from both public and private Iraqi higher education institutions. Data collection focused on students' and instructors' perceptions of platform usability, internet reliability, content quality, examination integrity, and institutional preparedness.

Results: Findings reveal that Google Classroom was the dominant platform adopted by 87.2% of respondents. Internet connectivity emerged as the foremost barrier, cited by 61.8% of participants. Concerns about academic dishonesty were raised by 45.1% of respondents, while institutional support was rated as excellent by 27.8%. The majority of students experienced electronic examinations for the first time during this period.

Conclusions: E-learning adoption in Iraq during the COVID-19 pandemic was reactive rather than strategically planned. While considerable potential was demonstrated, critical gaps in infrastructure, faculty training, and academic integrity mechanisms must be systematically addressed for sustainable implementation.

Limitations: The sample was geographically skewed toward Basrah governorate, limiting the generalizability of findings to all
Iraqi regions.

Contributions: This study provides evidence-based insights into emergency e-learning adoption in a conflict-affected, resource constrained developing country context, offering a foundation for future policy reform in Iraqi higher education

Keywords

COVID-19 Pandemic Digital Education Infrastructure E-Learning Effectiveness Higher Education Iraq Online Examination

How to Cite

Al-Azzawi, A. A. A. (2026). The Effectiveness of E-Learning in Iraqi Universities during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Selected Iraqi Universities and Institutes. Universal Teaching and Learning Journal, 2(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.35912/utlj.v2i2.4308

References

  1. Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
  2. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
  3. Al-Musawi, A. S. (2021). E-learning in Iraqi universities: Challenges and opportunities in the post pandemic era. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00257-w
  4. Al-Shujairi, Y. B. (2021). Iraqi students' experience of distance learning during COVID-19: Challenges and adaptations. Asian EFL Journal, 23(3), 87-114. https://doi.org/10.56001/aefj.v23i3.20
  5. Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2018). E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers and Education, 127, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.007
  6. Alkhalaf, A. M., Tekian, A., & Park, Y. S. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on medical education: Medical students' knowledge and attitudes towards online education in Saudi Arabia. Medical Teacher, 44(7), 733-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1994250
  7. Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5261-5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
  8. Aristovnik, A., Kerži?, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževi?, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12(20), 8438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438
  9. Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
  10. Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937
  11. Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers and Education, 122, 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001
  12. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.).
  13. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  14. Dawson, P. (2020). Defending assessment security in a digital world: Preventing e-cheating and supporting academic integrity in higher education.
  15. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  16. Graham, C. R. (2019). Blended learning: A potentially disruptive innovation in higher education. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O'Donnell (Eds.), In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A.
  17. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O'Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 279-296). Routledge (pp. 279-296).
  18. Hartnett, M. (2016). Motivation in online education.
  19. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning International Telecommunication Union. (2021). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2021. ITU Publications. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/7akgx
  20. Iraqi News Agency. (2020). Statement on e-learning examinations in Iraqi universities.. Retrievedfrom https://www.ina.iq/107427
  21. Karim, M. N., Kaminsky, S. E., & Behrend, T. S. (2021). Cheating, reactions, and performance in remotely proctored testing: An exploratory experimental study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(4), 555-572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9343-z
  22. Kumar, V., Ozdamar, K., & Ng, C. C. (2021). E-learning during COVID-19 crisis: Toward continuous quality improvement for successful and sustainable educational outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3329-3350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10396-w
  23. Lytras, M. D., Chui, K. T., & Visvizi, A. (2022). Data analytics for smart cities and higher education: Insights for sustainable development. Sustainability, 14(3), 1780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031780
  24. Martin, F., Budhrani, K., & Wang, C. (2020). Examining faculty perception of their readiness to teach online. Online Learning, 23(3), 97-119. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i3.1555
  25. Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students' perception and preference for online education in India during COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 3(1), 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101
  26. Muñoz-Najar, A., Gilberto, A., Hasan, A., Cobo, C., Azevedo, J. P., & Duryea, S. (2021). Remote learning during COVID-19: Lessons from today, principles for tomorrow.
  27. Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
  28. Sahu, P. (2020). Closure of universities due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff. Cureus, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7541
  29. Songkram, N., Osuwan, H., & Sung, E. (2021). Analysing the factors that affect the use of e-learning among university students in Thailand during COVID-19: A comparison of technology acceptance models. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6747-6763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10507-x
  30. Suartama, I. K., Setyosari, P., Sulthoni, S., & Ulfa, S. (2020). Development of an instructional design model for mobile learning in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(14), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i14.11848
  31. Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of individual level cultural values on users' acceptance of E-learning in developing countries. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 306-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.986154
  32. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The process of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
  33. Wang, C. H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2019). Students' characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email