AHRMR

Article Details

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): June

Effect of hybrid working on employee engagement

https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v5i2.2892
24 Jun 2025

Abstract

Purpose: During the COVID-19 pandemic, partial homeworking or hybrid working gained popularity among employees and employers across the world. Since then, many organisations continue to implement hybrid working as a high performing work practice (HPWP) to improve employee performance. This study explores the effects of hybrid working on employee work engagement on the scale of the level of energy, work involvement, concentration, and enthusiasm. This study also investigated the factors that influence employee engagement in hybrid work.

Research methodology: Using a cross-sectional study design with snowballing sampling technique, interview data of twenty nine IT employees were collected. Interview data were analysed thematically using NVivo software.

Results: The qualitative analysis of interview data reveals that despite some factors of homeworking that affect work engagement negatively, hybrid working has potentials to improve work engagement through increasing their work and family life balance and reducing commuting exhaustion.

Conclusions: Hybrid working can enhance employee engagement by reducing commuting stress and supporting better work-life balance, particularly in terms of energy and flexibility. However, challenges such as communication barriers and work-family conflicts especially among female employees may hinder its effectiveness. With adequate organizational support and clear structure, hybrid working can serve as a strategic approach to boosting employee engagement.

Limitations: Qualitative analysis of only twenty six sample of only one organization is not sufficient for generalizing. A quantitative analysis using data of broader sample may provide a result generalizable to other types of organizations or regions.

Contribution: This study contributes to the understanding of factors that influence employee work engagement by emphasizing the benefits of hybrid working to improve employee engagement, an important facilitator of higher performance.

Novelty: This research made a comparison between homeworking, onsite working and hybrid working, and explored the factors of different work arrangement that influence employee engagement, an area that has not received enough attention in the existing literature.

Keywords

Commuting Exhaustion High Performance Work Practices Homeworking Hybrid Working Work Engagement Work-Life Balance

How to Cite

Siddika, B. A. (2025). Effect of hybrid working on employee engagement. Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 5(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v5i2.2892

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Bakker, A. (2017). Strategic and Proactive Approaches to Work Engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 67-75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.002
  2. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a Model of Work Engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209-223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
  3. Cartmill, C. (2020). New Survey Shows 87% of Staff Wish to Work from Home in Post Lockdown World. Belfast News Letter, 28.
  4. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work Engagement: A Quantitative Review and Test of its Relations with Task and Contextual Performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
  5. Chung, H., & Van der Lippe, T. (2020). Flexible Working, Work–Life Balance, and Gender Equality: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 365-381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x
  6. CIPD. (2024). Employee Engagement and Motivation. Retrieved from https://www.cipd.org/uk/knowledge/factsheets/engagement-factsheet/#6227https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals
  7. D O'Gorman, K., & MacIntosh, R. (2015). Research Methods for Business and Management: A Guide to Writing Your Dissertation: Goodfellow Publishers Ltd.
  8. Davidescu, A. A., Apostu, S.-A., Paul, A., & Casuneanu, I. (2020). Work Flexibility, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance Among Romanian Employees—Implications for Sustainable Human Resource Management. Sustainability, 12(15), 6086. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156086
  9. Eldor, L., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2017). The Nature of Employee Engagement: Rethinking the Employee–Organization Relationship. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(3), 526-552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1180312
  10. Felstead, A. (2022). Remote Working: A Research Overview: Routledge.
  11. Felstead, A., & Reuschke, D. (2020). Homeworking in the UK: Before and during the 2020 Lockdown. Retrieved from https://wiserd.ac.uk/publications/homeworking-uk-and-during-2020-lockdown
  12. Gerards, R., De Grip, A., & Baudewijns, C. (2018). Do New Ways of Working Increase Work Engagement?. Personnel Review, 47(2), 517-534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2017-0050
  13. Halford, S. (2005). Hybrid workspace: Re?spatialisations of Work, Organisation and Management. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(1), 19-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2005.00141.x
  14. Hameduddin, T., & Lee, S. (2021). Employee Engagement Among Public Employees: Examining the Role of Organizational Images. Public Management Review, 23(3), 422-446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1695879
  15. Hamilton Skurak, H., Malinen, S., Näswall, K., & Kuntz, J. C. (2021). Employee Wellbeing: The Role of Psychological Detachment on the Relationship Between Engagement And Work–Life Conflict. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 42(1), 116-141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X17750473
  16. Joo, B.-K., Zigarmi, D., Nimon, K., & Shuck, B. (2017). Work Cognition and Psychological Well-Being: The Role of Cognitive Engagement As A Partial Mediator. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 53(4), 446-469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886316688780
  17. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
  18. Kang, M., & Sung, M. (2017). How Symmetrical Employee Communication Leads to Employee Engagement and Positive Employee Communication Behaviors: The Mediation of Employee-Organization Relationships. Journal of Communication Management, 21(1), 82-102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-04-2016-0026
  19. Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing More with Less? Flexible Working Practices and the Intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83-106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349199
  20. Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., . . . Choi, V. K. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
  21. Lapierre, L. M., Van Steenbergen, E. F., Peeters, M. C., & Kluwer, E. S. (2016). Juggling Work and Family Responsibilities when Involuntarily Working More from Home: A Multiwave Study of Financial Sales Professionals. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(6), 804-822. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2075
  22. Mahmod, S. (2022). Demystifying Work-Related Outcomes and Life Satisfaction of Bangladeshi Working Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 4(2), 109-127. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v4i2.1535
  23. Milasi, S., González-Vázquez, I., & Fernández-Macías, E. (2021). Telework before the COVID-19 Pandemic: Trends and Drivers of Differences Across the EU.
  24. Mohapatra, M., Madan, P., & Srivastava, S. (2023). Loneliness at Work: Its Consequences and Role of Moderators. Global Business Review, 24(3), 433-450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919892714
  25. Niebuhr, F., Borle, P., Börner-Zobel, F., & Voelter-Mahlknecht, S. (2022). Healthy and Happy Working From Home? Effects of Working from Home on Employee Health and Job Satisfaction. International journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1122. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031122
  26. OECD. (2021). Government at a Glance 2021. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/07/government-at-a-glance-2021_70df9612/1c258f55-en.pdf
  27. Palumbo, R. (2020). Let Me Go to the Office! An Investigation Into the Side Effects of Working from Home on Work-Life Balance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6/7), 771-790. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2020-0150
  28. Petani, F. J., & Mengis, J. (2023). Technology and the Hybrid Workplace: The Affective Living of IT-Enabled Space. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(8), 1530-1553. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1998186
  29. Peters, P., Poutsma, E., Van der Heijden, B. I., Bakker, A. B., & Bruijn, T. d. (2014). Enjoying new Ways to Work: An HRM?Process Approach to Study Flow. Human Resource Management, 53(2), 271-290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21588
  30. Radoni?, M., Vukmirovi?, V., & Milosavljevi?, M. (2021). The Impact of Hybrid Workplace Models on Intangible Assets: The Case of an Emerging Country. Amfiteatru Economic, 23(58), 770-786.
  31. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  32. Shuck, B. (2011). Integrative Literature Review: Four Emerging Perspectives of Employee Engagement: An Integrative Literature Review. Human Resource Development Review, 10(3), 304-328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311410840
  33. Siddika, B. (2023). Hybrid Working, Well-Being and Gender: A Study on a Public Sector Organization During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Asian Journal of Social Science Studies, 8(2), 25-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v8i2.1345
  34. Sung, J., & Ashton, D. (2005). High Performance Work Practices: Linking Strategy and Skills to Performance Outcomes: Department of Trade and Industry London.
  35. Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., & Keulemans, L. (2012). Do New Ways of Working Foster Work Engagement?. Psicothema, 113-120.
  36. Turner, P. (2020). Employee Engagement in Contemporary Organizations. Employee Engagement in Contemporary Organizations.
  37. Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving Effective Remote Working During the COVID?19 Pandemic: A Work Design Perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16-59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290
  38. Wheatley, D. (2012). Good to be home? Time?use and Satisfaction Levels Among Home?Based Teleworkers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27(3), 224-241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00289.x
  39. Wontorczyk, A., & Ro?nowski, B. (2022). Remote, Hybrid, and On-Site Work during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and the Consequences for Stress and Work Engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 1-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042400
  40. Wood, S. J., Michaelides, G., Inceoglu, I., Hurren, E. T., Daniels, K., & Niven, K. (2021). Homeworking, Well-Being and the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Diary Study. International journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7575. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147575

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors

Bilkis Afroza Siddika
Department of Immigration & Passports, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Downloads

View PDF

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): June
Section: Articles
Contact Us
WhatsApp Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Email